Should you take the initiative to communicate with your leaders in the workplace?

In the workplace, as in other occasions at work, we must communicate more with the leader, and the better the communication between the two parties, the more convenient it will be to collaborate, which is conducive to future work.

Communication is very important in the workplace, and you can't understand the leader's intentions without communicating them, and the leaders can't grasp them without communicating your ideas.

There are two types of communication with leaders, work and life.

In life, the main thing is daily chat, family, children, etc., to talk to him about the topics that the leader cares about, in this way you can shorten the distance between the leaderless, and it is also a good way to show your eloquence.

At work, the frequency of communication is determined according to the different leadership styles of leaders. Some leaders like to grasp the situation, so they should ask for more instructions and report more. Some leaders like to grasp the general direction, so important things and results can be reported well.

When encountering things that require leadership decision-making, you must ask the leader for instructions, and do not assert and be self-righteous.

In short, try to communicate with leaders as much as possible and show yourself, and you also need to master the way and language of communication according to different leadership personalities and occasions.

It depends on what the situation is. If you are a leader with a strong desire to control, you have to personally ask about everything, and you should take the initiative to communicate about this. If you are a leader who only focuses on the result and does not pay attention to the process, communicate at the right time, otherwise you will find it annoying.

This kind of thing should be different from person to person and adaptable.

Many people feel that they are just a "worker" in the enterprise, and whether they do well or not, whether the business is run well or not has little to do with them. But in fact, in the final analysis, each of us is working for ourselves: in order to obtain a higher economic income, in order to display our abilities, and in order to be recognized by more people.

Therefore, we should correct our attitude and treat our work as our own business.

In the workplace, we often envy those who can speak well. But in fact, even if we can speak well, these are only "superficial efforts", and the most important thing is whether our work ability can meet the requirements of leadership. A shrewd leader will never appreciate mediocrity, nor will he reuse mediocrity.

Therefore, if you want to get along well with the leader, you must let the leader worry about the work, and complete the work assigned by the leader with quality and quantity. When we do more than the leader expects, and we can share more work with the leader, the leader's attitude towards us will naturally become better.

I think it is, but you don't need to be deliberate, if you have the opportunity, such as a dinner party or something, it is also a good thing to communicate more, it depends on whether you dare to communicate, whether you have connotation and enough self-confidence, if what you say has no connotation, some leaders are acceptable, and some cannot. However, everyone has their own characteristics, and it's good to be yourself. It's okay to talk to the leader as if he were an ordinary person.

There should be active communication, but not too much, too annoying, only the practical work and the successful completion of the task indicators are the main thing.

Whether in the workplace or in life, it is necessary to communicate more. In the workplace, you should take the initiative to communicate with the leader about your work, the problems you encounter and the solutions, ask the leader for more work experience, and show your work results.

You definitely need to take the initiative to communicate with the leader, there are many things that need to be reported at work, and this can also bring you closer to each other.

At the very least, you definitely need to communicate more with your leaders. After all, a lot of work is arranged directly by the leader, and if you don't communicate with him, then some work will not be carried out, and more communication will help to bring you closer. It will also help you develop in your future career.

Yes, if there are problems or no problems, you must take the initiative to communicate with the leader, and you can become good friends after a long time of communication.

In the workplace, you should take the initiative to communicate with your leaders, but you can't be too deliberate, and you must know how to measure and grasp the timing.

There is no need, it will give people the feeling of slapping horses.

Of course, you can take the initiative to communicate with leaders in the workplace.

Leadership, communication is a must in the workplace. You guys for a day. Slay. The time for leadership is there, and if you don't communicate, others will communicate, and people who take the initiative to communicate tend to be promoted faster.

Yes, it is necessary.

Communicate more with leaders, not only to learn work knowledge, but also to enhance work friendship.

In the workplace, you can't have friends to communicate with the leader, and you should be moderate, don't be too sycophant, and don't look like no one in your eyes.

In the workplace, if you take the initiative to communicate with the leader, it will be very helpful for your future, and he thinks that you are an open-minded person.

The ability to work in the workplace is important, but emotional intelligence, the knowledge of dealing with people are also important, and it is good to communicate more with leaders, but it is necessary to pay attention to the proportions of what I say.

Work-related communication.

Of course, in the workplace, you must take the initiative to communicate with the leader.

You must have a good relationship with the leader, otherwise you will definitely be the one who suffers; It is much more beneficial to have a good relationship with the leader.

First, your promotion is determined by your leadership. A word from a big leader can determine the fate of a small soldier in the workplace; Even if you are not a big leader, just your immediate boss, a department head, or even a department deputy cannot be easily offended. Because although these people can't decide your promotion, they can do bad things for you.

Second, leaders have mastered many resources that grassroots personnel cannot grasp. In the allocation of resources, people are emotional, and they will naturally lean towards those who have a good relationship with them. For example, if a department wants to promote a person, the leader will definitely prefer to use someone who has a good relationship with him, rather than someone who has a general relationship with him.

Third, if you have a good relationship with the leader, you can get the support of the leader. At work, as a soldier, a small thing needs to be coordinated, you may find several people, fight countless **, run for several days can not coordinate, and as your leader, you may only need a simple **, a few minutes to do. If the leader is willing to support you, help you stand up or coordinate, many things can be easily solved.

1. It is necessary to have a good relationship with leaders in the workplace.

Younger generations of employees may be more concerned about their own feelings, and at the same time, they may feel that there is no need to get too close to the leader, let alone build a good relationship with the leader. But the truth is that if we can have a good relationship with the leader, we can get a lot of convenience in our work, and at the same time, we can have a more comfortable working environment.

Although we don't need to directly pat the leader's ass, there is no need to have a very stiff relationship with the leader.

Second, we need to help leaders solve problems.

For employees, they need to help leaders solve problems as much as possible in a way that makes their jobs better. We need to know that the leader's job is to coordinate the whole team and achieve some kind of performance goal in this way. As part of the team, we need to make it as easy as possible for the leader.

When the leader can successfully complete the work, we can naturally be promoted and raised because of the leader's achievements.

Third, there is no need for us to get too close to the leadership.

Some people may attach too much importance to the so-called so-called human sophistication, and at the same time, they will attach great importance to their relationship with the leader. For leaders, it is important to hear that the employee they need is someone who can do their job well, not a person who thinks about themselves all day long. I believe that a good employee must be able to do what he or she should do, and on the basis of this ability, we can talk about the so-called office relationship.

At work, I feel that it is still necessary to say hello and smile to the leader. will make a good impression on others. In the development of state-owned enterprises, instead of working hard, it is better to have a good relationship with the leaders.

This view is not entirely wrong, but it has significant limitations.

First of all, a good relationship with the leader means that you can get greater development in the company, including salary increases and promotions, as well as access to business resources.

But as soon as there is a change in leadership, all the environmental conditions change.

In other words, the premise of the above conditions is that the leader has been in the company for a long time, and if the leader changes to a different style, I think this self-confidence will be greatly adjusted.

Second, even if we have a good relationship with a leader, it doesn't mean that the leader's attitude towards us will never change.

After all, there are no permanent friends in the workplace, only eternal interests.

In some special cases, the leader may also "sacrifice" your interests to satisfy his or her own interests.

In terms of the above two points, it is obviously not wise to pin your future career hopes on the leader.

Second, on the basis of one's own work efforts, it will be more advantageous to do a good job in the relationship with the leader.

Xiao Lin feels that he is a practical person, who only works hard to do things, but is not good at interpersonal relationships.

My advice to him is that there is nothing wrong with hard work, even the most important foundation, but you can't completely ignore the relationship with the leader.

I'll give you an example of five years ago, when another colleague and I were competing for the position of assistant to the chairman.

In terms of performance and ability, I don't think that colleague is weaker than me, and even more advantageous than me.

However, due to the fact that I usually have more contact with the chairman, the boss's overall impression of me is not bad, and after the final debriefing, the company still chose me as the final candidate.

In this case, I know that I have some element of luck, but that luck may only be due to the fact that the leader has a good impression of me beforehand.

It can be seen that your own efforts are the foundation, but a good relationship with the leader will often become your competitive advantage.

3. Make leadership a resource for your career development.

It is a very important thing to have a good relationship with the leader, and some people will simply understand that having a relationship with the leader is a sycophant.

This black-and-white tubular thinking limits our progress.

Getting along well with leaders is not necessarily the result of a flattering relationship, but it may also be the development of leaders into one's own professional resources.

For example, many companies will implement the mentoring system, so when the leader plays the role of a master, it can become a guiding light for us to move forward.

As employees, we can make good use of resources such as leadership, which will in turn promote the improvement of our work ability and career development.

Knowing this, I think we will have a new understanding of the relationship between leaders.

Write at the end. In the workplace, should you work hard or have a good relationship with your leader? This question is not a multiple-choice question, but an open-ended question and answer question.

We need to look at their inner connections better from a dialectical perspective in order to make an informed choice.

Hello, it is necessary to have a good relationship with the leader at work, to be respected and recognized is the "emotional value" that everyone needs, maybe they don't care about the amount of money at all, they care more about the attitude, don't think that every leader is greedy, in fact, the leader earns more than his subordinates, some leaders don't care about these at all, but the person who can make himself feel comfortable will definitely become the object of leadership training.

Think about it from another perspective, if you were a leader, would you promote someone who is respectful, or would you promote someone who works against you every day? Most leaders will, of course, promote those who are capable.

The workplace is formed by two sets of rules, one is the rules of saying but not doing, and the other is the rules of doing but not saying. If you really think that ability is the criterion for promotion, it means that you are still thinking in the first set of rules.

Substitute leadership will be cautious.

In many units, there are similar "talent pools", "reserve cadres", "most potential employees" and so on. These settings may seem like an incentive, but are they really selected from them? Or is it really meaningful?

Savvy people know that it is just another way to "draw pies", a measure of leadership motivation, but when such an opportunity is presented in front of them, how many people will turn down?

In the logic of the boss, having substitutability is the premise of sustainable development, and the whole machine cannot be stopped because a screw is broken, so it is necessary to standardize the behavior of subordinates with various processes, systems, training, etc., and weaken the role of each individual in the organization.

At the same time, the replaceable and irreplaceable came into being, looking at those who have a good relationship with the leader, either understand the output of "emotional value", or are irreplaceable people, there is no one who has a good relationship with the leader, is those who have low emotional intelligence, and can be replaced at any time.

Being irreplaceable is the core of the relationship with leaders, and even the output of "emotional value" is irreplaceable. Of course, this society has never lacked talents, and the so-called irreplaceability is actually on the basis of not increasing costs.

For example, if you find someone to replace your current job, you will pay more than you, then you are irreplaceable now, if you are replaced, the cost is lower than now, or under the same circumstances, then you will be replaced at any time.

Write at the end. In the workplace, it is very important to have a good relationship with the leader, but the relationship is only a by-product of the actual value creation and output of "emotional value". If you can create value and bring "emotional value" to the leader, and at the same time have irreplaceability, then the relationship with the leader must not be too bad.

On the contrary, the leader will not have a good relationship with those who are good-for-nothing.