Can a horse and an elephant eat each other in chess?

The answer is yes, horses and elephants can eat each other. This kind of problem is so common! There have been quite a few similar problems.

This should be a question that only beginners should consider, but in fact, there is a prerequisite for this question, which is that this question refers to a normal game of chess. Because in some mutated games, the horse and the elephant may not be able to eat each other, such as flipping chess.

In the normal game of Chinese chess, each chess piece only has a difference in the value of the sub-force, but there is no strict distinction between size and size. The value of the sub-force is a measure of the killing and deterrence ability of a chess piece, and does not mean who is big and who is small.

As long as the opponent's piece is at the attack point of our piece, and it is our turn to move, you can capture the opponent's piece.

Therefore, except for the soldiers and elephants who will not be able to eat each other because they cannot go abroad, the other sub-forces can basically eat each other, and the difference is only in the question of whose turn is to go. (The existence of white-faced generals between generals because they can't look at each other can also be considered to eat each other).

For example, in the above chess game, the horse and the elephant can eat each other, and the horse and the horse can also eat each other, the difference is only a matter of whose turn to go.

So of course, horses and elephants can eat each other.

OK. As long as the location is right, you can eat each other.

In chess, each piece can eat each other.

Depending on how you walk, horses are much more useful than elephants.

The answer is yes, there are many similar problems, in Chinese chess, there is only a difference between the value of the sub-force, and there is no strict distinction between the big and the small. Therefore, except for the soldiers and elephants who can't eat each other because they can't go abroad, other sub-forces can basically eat each other (because of the existence of white-faced generals between generals, it can also be regarded as eating each other), and the difference is only in the question of whose turn is to go.

Soldiers and elephants can eat each other.

For example, in the game above, if it is Red's turn, you can use a pawn to eat Black's pawn, or you can use a pawn to eat Black's pawn; And vice versa, if it's Black's turn, you can use a black elephant to eat the red pawn, or you can use a pawn to eat the red pawn.

Therefore the soldiers and the elephants can eat each other. Of course, because elephants can't go abroad, they are passive, and as long as the soldiers enter the elephant's hunting point, they can be eaten by elephants.

Yes, as long as the opponent's horse is on the foothold where his horse can go, it can be eaten, but it should be noted that your horse is not on the same chessboard scale line as the only chess piece with the general, otherwise the horse will cause the general to lose as soon as he jumps away.

At this time, the red can't retreat and eat the dark horse, because the general will take care of the face.

At this time, the red horse can eat the black horse, because there are soldiers and generals.

Definitely, as long as the opponent's son is on your side's offensive line, it can be eaten.

An elephant in chess can eat a horse. The chess pieces that can be eaten by the elephant are: rook, horse, artillery, soldier (pawn), phase (elephant), shi (shi), and shuai (general). To put it bluntly, a chess chess pawn can eat not only a horse, but also other chess pieces except the horse.

In chess, there is no difference between the size of all the pieces, and any piece can eat each other.

In other words, in chess, not only can all the pieces be eaten casually, but other pieces can also be like this.

I believe that as long as you can play chess, you must have heard of a saying, called "The horse walks the Japanese character like the field, and the little soldier is gone". This sentence vividly summarizes the moves of the three chess pieces in chess: horse, elephant, and pawn.

In fact, there are many similar Tong Yao or common sayings among the people, such as: the car walks on the straight road and the horse steps on the slope, like the Feitian word cannon is separated, and the pawn crosses the river.

Another example: the general does not leave the nine palaces, and the scholars do not leave the officials. The elephant flies to the four corners of the camp in all directions, and the horse rushes step by step. The cannon must be cut into a son, and the car line is straight to the west and east. Only the pawn can only take one step, crossing the river and advancing and retreating without a trace.

Chess pawns can only move within their own area, and cannot cross the river to the opponent's area.

Chess horses can be eaten, Chinese chess.

There is no such thing as anyone who is big or small who can eat each other if the conditions are suitable, because chess is an imitation of ancient warfare, and small soldiers can also kill generals in war.

Each piece in chess has a fixed move, and the moves of "Will" and "Shuai" are in the nine-square grid.

As long as its movement is within a vertical or horizontal line, it can be moved up and down, left and right, and when moving, it is necessary to ensure that the "handsome" and "will" walking range is within a square of the vertical or horizontal line, and cannot be opposite to the enemy.

Soldiers can only follow the generals in chess, can not go beyond the nine-square grid range of four lines, the "soldier" move is to walk step by step before crossing the river, after crossing the river can go left and right two directions to move one step at a time, can only move forward can not retreat, but after crossing the river the power will be enhanced.

"Xiang" in chess mainly plays a defensive and protective role, the range of activities is only in the own position and limited to the river boundary, can not cross the river boundary, can not move when there are chess pieces in the middle of the field character.

The way of moving the "car" is to control the seventeen subs, but there can be no sub obstruction, the car can not be limited when walking, and the vertical and horizontal lines of the blocking can go.

All are very important and indispensable, but some people are used to using horses, and some people are used to using cannons. It is easy to use, and it is naturally important.

The early artillery is important, and the late horse is important.

Running in the middle of the opening game is more important than the horse, and the horse in the endgame is more important than running.

It cannot be said which is more important, horses and artillery, and each has its own role depending on the situation. When attacking, horses can attack independently, but artillery cannot. Defensively, horses are also stronger than guns. However, for ordinary chess players, horses are more important, and for ordinary chess players, horses should be more flexible.

The role of the horse and the cannon in chess is different, so it is impossible to say which one is more important. Generally speaking, the power of the cannon in the opening stage is relatively large, because there is more power in the opening game, there are more gun carriages, and it is easier for the cannon to exert its power. In the endgame stage, the horse is more powerful, because the endgame has less strength, and the horse has fewer lame legs, so it is easier to exert its power.

The artillery is not easy to exert its power because of the lack of strength in the endgame, and the gun carriage is less, so it can only be used to attack the artillery mount at home. So there is a chess proverb: the endgame wins the horse and returns home.

Generally speaking, the more powerful the sub-artillery, the more important it is, because it has strong mobility, a wide killing area, and easy coordination.

The less power, the more powerful the horse! Because he has become more mobile and has stable combat power independently!

So, the opening cannon wins the horse, and the endgame horse wins the cannon! When tossing and turning, the cannon is better than the horse, and the horse is better than the cannon when there are few people!

Specifically, it depends on the situation! Sometimes cannons can't do the horse's business! Sometimes horses can't replace cannons!

It's like you say it's better to be a son or a daughter!

When the head cannon, the endgame horse, I often hear people brag that let one or two horses never hear a cannon, and this is already telling.

If you want me to say that neither horses nor cannons are as powerful as cars!

The role of the cannon is greater at the beginning, and the role of the horse is greater in the second half of the game, so it is said that the endgame horse wins the cannon.

The answer is yes, in Chinese chess, there is only a difference between the value of the sub-force, and the value of the sub-force is said to be easy to use or not, and how strong the deterrent ability is, but there is no strict distinction between the size of the sub-force. As long as it is your turn to move, and the opponent's piece is right on the attack point of our pawn, you can capture it.

Therefore, except for the soldiers and elephants who can't eat each other because they can't go abroad, other sub-forces can basically eat each other (in fact, because of the existence of white-faced generals, the generals can also be considered to eat each other).

For example, in the game above, if it is Red's turn, Black's knight can be eaten with a rook; And vice versa, if it's Black's turn, he can use a black horse to eat the red rook.

So the cart and the horse can eat each other, and the difference is only a matter of whose turn it is.

Of course, you can eat each other. In chess, the rook can go horizontally and vertically, and every child must eat, but the horse in chess is to take the "day" shape, and there is also a "lame leg" restriction, once it is not "lame" and the rook is on the horse's feet, the horse can eat the rook directly. Chinese chess is broad and profound.

In Chinese chess, the rook and the horse can eat each other, the rook must eat the horse in a straight line, and the horse must eat the rook at the diagonal point of the Japanese character, and the horse can not be obstructed.

In chess, the rook and the horse can eat each other, as long as they are on its track.

Yes. In fact, each piece in chess can eat each other, depending on how the player strategizes.

Of course, you can eat each other, as long as your position is not right, then the horse can eat the cart or the horse.

In chess, not only rooks and horses, but all chess pieces can eat each other within the rules!