What is the difference between the citation method and the illustration method

The difference between the citation method and the illustration method is as follows:

1. The meaning is different.

The citation method, the full name of which is the citation argumentation method, is an argumentation method that proves an argument by citing classic quotations, conventional market remarks, and common sense of life as argumentative arguments.

The illustration method is an argumentation method in which a point is clearly stated in an essay and then specific examples are given to prove the point.

2. The role is different.

The illustration method is the most widely used in discussions. It is also a fruitful method of reasoning. Because any point of view cannot exist in isolation, and facts speak louder than words, using conclusive and typical facts to prove a point of view will enhance the persuasiveness of the article, so the illustration method is generally used.

The citation method uses authoritative words to make the reasoning more profound, thorough, and convincing, and strives to reflect the power of the theory and the ideological depth of the article.

3. Use it differently.

The citation method should pay attention to the accuracy and pertinence of the remarks and facts cited. It is also important to understand that not all introductions are Taoist arguments. Although quotes famous quotes.

It can constitute a Taoist argument, but only those introductions that have a theoretical support for the argument are Taoist arguments.

Illustration cannot just put examples after the argument without revealing the intrinsic connection between the arguments of the argument. Without full analysis and reasoning, it is impossible to expound the viewpoint clearly, and the article will become simplistic and lack the internal logical force. After laying out the facts, you need to be reasonable.

The differences are as follows: 1. The meaning is different.

Citation method is an argumentation method that proves an argument by citing classic quotations, conventional market remarks, and common sense of life as argumentative arguments.

The illustration method is an argumentation method that gives specific examples to prove the point after the point is clarified in the argument article.

2. The role is different.

The citation method proves that the use of authoritative words will make the reasoning more profound, thorough, and convincing, and strive to reflect the power of the theory and the ideological depth of the article.

The illustration method proves that no point of view can exist in isolation, and facts speak louder than words, and using conclusive and typical facts to prove a point will enhance the persuasiveness of the article.

3. The characteristics are different.

The citation method is mainly to pay attention to the accuracy and pertinence of the remarks and facts cited, and to make it clear that not all quotations are Taoist arguments;

The exemplification method cannot only put the examples after the argument, but does not reveal the internal connection between the arguments and arguments, that is, after laying out the facts, it needs to be reasonable.

Citations are used to cite other people's remarks or truths and theorems to prove them; Illustrations are demonstrated by events that have actually occurred. If there is no environment, the examples will not be cited, and it will depend on the actual situation to apply.

<> citation method is an argumentation method that proves an argument by citing classic quotations, conventional market remarks, common sense, etc. as argumentative arguments.

The citation method is an argumentation method that proves the argument by citing classic quotations, conventional market remarks, common sense of life, etc. as argumentative arguments.

Discussion, also known as reasoning, is a style of analyzing things, discussing facts, expressing opinions, and putting forward propositions. The author determines whether his views are correct or wrong and establishes or denies certain claims by presenting facts, reasoning without branches, distinguishing between right and wrong, and so on. The proposal should have clear views, sufficient arguments, concise language, reasonable arguments, and strict logic.

It is different from the narrative essay that indirectly expresses the author's thoughts and feelings with a vivid narrative, and it is also different from the expository essay that focuses on introducing or explaining the shape, nature, cause, and function of things. All in all, the discussion is an article that convinces people with reason, and the narrative and expository essays are articles that move people with facts and teach people with knowledge.

1. The different objects of narration.

Reasoning is reasoning. Nowadays, the examination requires what is called the citation method, which is an argumentation method that cites authoritative quotes, allusions, allusions, allusions, and well-established theorems and formulas from ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities to prove the central thesis.

Citing argumentation is an argumentation method that cites famous sayings as arguments, analyzes problems and explains the truth by citing classics. There are two ways to quote: one is explicit citation, which explains who said the quoted words or their sources, and the other is implicit quotations, that is, they do not explain who said or came from the quoted words.

The method of using sweet potato is changeable and very flexible.

2. The effect is different.

Because of the rigor of the argument and the source of the reason used, the simple reasoning argument gives people a lack of trust, while the quoted argument mostly borrows famous quotations and universal axioms, which are more convincing than simple reasoning arguments.

Citation-based argumentation is a kind of "reasoning argument", also known as "citation", that is, the argumentation method of citing famous sayings or famous people's opinions as arguments, citing classics to analyze problems and explain reasoning. There are two ways to quote: one is explicit citation, which explains who said the quoted words or their sources, and the other is implicit quotations, that is, they do not explain who said the quoted words or the source of the difficult ones.

The citation method is varied and flexible.

3. Different roles.

Reasoning makes the argument authoritative and persuasive. Answer: The argumentation method of the rational argument is used to demonstrate the ......so that the argument is more generalized and deeper, and the argument is more convincing. The key – the argument.

Methods of arguing the central argument by quoting famous quotes, aphorisms, aphorisms, etc.