-
Scenic spotsCelebrities should not be given "privileges"., moreThe path should not be opened to them alone! Because celebrities are also ordinary people, there shouldn't be two treatments for spending the same money!
Celebrities are also ordinary people
In fact, celebrities also grew up with an ordinary person, especially some grassroots stars, who are often ordinary people who were ordinary before. This is because of their ordinary identity, which gives them the motivation to struggle, the idea that they have to work harder than others, and their later success, and their later identity - star. Therefore, celebrities should stick to their duties and make their ordinariness more valuable!
Making full use of their light and heat in their singing and acting careers, and being able to bring us the best works, is the greatest feedback to our ordinary people!
Same money, same treatment
The reason is that everyone spends the same money to enjoy the same treatment, and no matter what scenic spot is, it should not open up a special path for stars for any reason, especially to provide them with any privileged treatment! There is a saying that there is a penny of price and a penny of value, in fact, money is not divided into high and low, so those who spend the same amount of money should enjoy the same treatment as celebrities. We queue together when we need to queue, we pay together when we need to pay, and we walk together when we need to walk......This is a good picture that a normal scenic spot should have.
So, whenPrivilege became a habit. When special treatment becomes a kind of deservedness, more and more social contradictions will arise! So tourism shouldn't open a back door to celebrities! They should not be given privileges!
-
I don't think there is any privilege, because there are so many people in the scenic spot, it is impossible to say that it is impossible to open up a road for them to play alone, because now celebrities will be low-key, and they don't need this privilege.
-
This should just be the difference in scenic spots, right? Yes, but you shouldn't engage in privileges, because celebrities are also people, and everyone should be equal from above.
-
I don't think so, because everyone is on the same footing, they are all human beings, and there is no need to engage in privilege. The path should not be carved out alone.
-
I don't think scenic spots should open up a path for celebrities alone. Engage in privileges. Celebrities are also people. It's not other occasions that should be treated equally.
-
No, celebrities are also people, not only scenic spots, many places should not engage in privileges, everyone is equal, and this bad style should not be advocated.
-
I don't think so, first of all, celebrities are also people, and he is also a tourist in a scenic spot, just like ordinary people, he should not be treated specially.
-
I don't feel that it should be, whether it is a celebrity or an ordinary person, they all travel as tourists, so it should be equal.
Strengthen education on social civilization, improve citizens' civilized literacy, and increase the intensity of punishment, so that some people who have no quality will not dare to pick it up at all.
If two people get married, then, they must have children for the man, because getting married and having children is a woman's lifelong mission, and if you don't want children after marriage, then it is better not to get married.
This question depends on whether the family is marrying a daughter-in-law or a daughter. We have all attended many weddings of my brothers and sisters in the family, and there are no tolls for the newlyweds. And these two situations are also different. <> >>>More
Yes, and in ordinary life, parents must communicate more with their children, and then understand what their children think, and at the same time establish the correct three views for their children, and standardize their children's words and deeds.
Nowadays, people can go out without their wallets, but they can never do without their phones. This habit has successfully affected our parents, most of them were born in the 60s, witnessed the mobile phone from scratch, they don't seem to be so dependent on the mobile phone, so the market launched the elderly machine, the elderly mobile phone only has the function of receiving and calling, can not meet the needs of parents, so what is the reason for buying a smart phone? >>>More