Legal professionals please, lawyers, judges, legal professionals please

As long as the performance is good and the conditions for commutation are met, the sentence can be commuted again, and there is no limit on the number of times, but there is a limit on the number of years, and the actual minimum sentence must be served is 10 years. However, he is over 60 years old and can be released on parole after serving 10 years in prison.

Article 78 of the Criminal Law stipulates: Where a sentence of controlled release, short-term detention, or fixed-term imprisonment is actually served after the commutation, it must not be less than one-half of the original sentence; Where a sentence of life imprisonment is given, it must not be less than 10 years. (That is to say.)"Song of Friends"The actual time limit for imprisonment is 10 years. )

Let him make meritorious contributions, and report and expose any big and serious cases.

Article 7 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in Handling Voluntary Surrender and Meritorious Service On the basis of the provisions of the first paragraph of Criminal Law article 68, criminals have reported or exposed the major criminal conduct of others, and it is verified to be true upon investigation; Provide important clues for the detection of other major cases, which have been verified to be true; Prevent serious criminal activity of others; Assist judicial authorities in apprehending other major criminal suspects (including co-defendants); Where there are other major contributions to the state and society, it shall be found to have made major meritorious contributions.

The standards for "major crimes", "major cases", and "major criminal suspects" as used in the preceding paragraph generally refer to situations where criminal suspects or defendants might be sentenced to indefinite imprisonment or higher, or where the case has a relatively large impact in that province, autonomous region, directly governed municipality, or nationwide.

He is over 60 years old"You can get a medical parole.

1. The court will accept the case because the joint property relationship and the lease contract relationship are two different legal relationships, and they are different subject matter of litigation in professional terms.

The building is not right, but it is the common property such as land and real estate such as houses that is divided, not just the property. As for the method of division of common property, it is stipulated in Article 100, Paragraph 1 of the Property Law: "The co-owners may determine the method of division through consultation.

If no agreement can be reached, and the jointly owned immovable or movable property can be divided and the value will not be diminished by the division, the physical property shall be divided; Where it is difficult to divide or the value will be diminished due to division, the price obtained from the discount, auction or sale shall be divided. "You are in charge of the law in the specific provisions, so I will not explain them. You know.

3. Whether the lease contract expires has nothing to do with how the court will decide, because according to the principle of sale and purchase without breaking the lease established in article 229 of the Contract Law, the change in the ownership of the leased property does not affect the validity of the lease contract. If a dispute arises over the lease contract, it should be handled separately. As stated on the 4th floor, there is no legal connection between the two.

1. The court will accept it.

2. If the negotiation fails, the court will not auction it as a whole, and the auction is a matter of the execution stage. Both A and B can participate in the auction.

3. If the lease cannot be terminated, the owner can exercise the right of disposal after the lease contract is executed.

1. The court will accept it.

2. If the two parties fail to negotiate and fail, the court will divide the judgment according to the proportion of their respective capital contributions, and conduct an auction at the execution stage. The partners have the right of first refusal.

3. The difference between the two in the judgment should be that the lease contract has not expired, and the judgment will emphasize that "the sale does not break the lease", and the successor should complete the performance of the lease contract

I think there is a problem with this tenancy agreement, can the joint property be leased to the co-owners?

1 Xiao Li rented Xiao Zhang's share.

2. There is no legal obstacle, and it can not be called a lease, but it can be divided into small shares and dividends of 1,500 yuan per month.

3. It is stated that Xiao Li, as the co-owner, leases the subject shop, and the monthly rent of the whole room is 3,000 yuan, and Xiao Li must pay Xiao Zhang a monthly rent of 1,500 yuan on schedule, and the rights, responsibilities and interests arising from the lease shall be borne by Xiao Li.

These are two legal relationships, the first house is rented, the rent is 3,000 yuan, and the second, Xiao Zhang and Xiao Li are the owners of the house, sharing the rent, half of one person, it is recommended to sign a contract to sign the whole room to avoid future disputes.

1. The whole store.

2. Yes, and does not conflict with the current law, it can be the lessee and assume the rights and obligations of the lessee.

3. B form is good.

I don't talk about the specifics, it's too troublesome. To put it bluntly, shares cannot be rented, and there is no lease or lease of shares or capital contributions or shares in civil law, so the rent can only be rented for the entire store. After Xiao Li paid the rent, he was dividing, so the 1,500 yuan went around and came back, and the remaining 1,500 was Xiao Zhang's.

1. The entire store.

2. No. Third, the second form.