What are the trends in the pattern of great power relations?

1. "Overall stability" is maintained. Relations between major powers have remained basically stable and more flexible, and direct confrontation between major powers is less likely. The strategic contradictions in the relations between the major powers will not disappear because of mutual cooperation, nor will they change the basic situation of mutual cooperation because of mutual struggles, but the competitive side of cooperation is intensifying, and the side of borrowing and restraining is developing.

The global strategic adjustment of the United States and the enhancement of China's comprehensive national strength have become the key to leading a new round of interaction in the relations between major countries, and the situation of cooperation and mutual restraint between China and the United States has become a main line affecting the overall situation of relations between major countries.

Second, the "profit-seeking competition" is fierce. The major powers have paid more attention to economic diplomacy, especially the intensified competition around strategic resources, energy production areas, and energy channels, intensified the game, and active energy diplomacy, resulting in an increase in contradictions and frictions caused by competition. Oil and gas resources are related to the core interests of all countries, and major oil and gas suppliers are increasingly inclined to use resources as a tool, exert political influence, and build a relationship between major countries that is beneficial to themselves.

Third, there is a trend of increasing interactivity. The relations between the great powers are getting closer and closer to the relationship of uniformity, and the great powers may form some kind of temporary alliance because of a specific issue, but the alliance that forms a lasting opposition to a certain country may become smaller and smaller. Each major power has its own unique perspective and stance on its relations with other major powers, and has tried its best to avoid being used against third countries to cooperate and compete with each other as a general law among major powers.

There is a multipolar trend, one super and many strong.

The United States is a superpower, Japan and China are how strong they are, and then it is slowly becoming a trend of multipolarity.

And now the world is also a general trend of peaceful development.

There is more cooperation and closer ties between countries.

The new characteristics of the current adjustment of relations between major powers are:

First, the common interests among the major powers far outweigh the differences.

Second, cooperation and struggle exist simultaneously in bilateral relations.

Third, various combinations of issue-driven major-country relations are in the ascendant.

Fourth, the equilibrium of the world pattern has become a general trend in the evolution of relations between major countries.

Let's take a look at the history of China, kid.

From ancient times to the present, if any small country wants to be respected by other countries, especially big countries, then its only way is to balance its strength and play the so-called strategic balance game. Some clues can also be seen from the current relations between major powers, especially China, the United States, Russia, and India... These countries and China are relatively opposed from a political point of view, but for the sake of national interests, the major powers will not take the line of confrontation, because this will often lose both sides, and other major powers will be relatively strong in such confrontation.

And most of the many small countries are attached to the waist of the big powers, using the balance of the big powers to confront the big powers that have direct conflicts of interest with them. Our neighboring Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia... Iran, Syria, these are.

Does putting 10 kg of size on one side and 1 kg of size on the other side of the balance have any effect on the other side? The world's major powers account for more than 70% of the entire world in terms of politics, economy and military, so how much influence do you think it will have?

First, the major powers have, to varying degrees, recognized that peace and development are the main theme of the present era, and almost without exception are pursuing the principle of unremitting self-improvement at home and coexistence through external competition. Internally, we should put economic construction and reform in the first place, and promote economic development with the help of science and technology, so as to enhance our comprehensive national strength and improve the people's living standards. Externally, they seek to improve their own situation in order to gain as many benefits as possible and create favorable external conditions for the development of their own countries.

Given the special status and role of a great power, what happens inside it often affects the outside world. For example, the re-election of George W. Bush in the United States and Vladimir Putin in Russia in 2004, the blocking of the EU constitution in referendums in France and the Netherlands in 2005, and the Democratic Party's victory in the 2006 US midterm elections have all produced obvious international repercussions.

Second, while frictions between major powers may cause trouble in the world, cooperation between them will bring more benefits to world affairs. For example, the war in Iraq, which has not yet been completely concluded, and the protracted conflict between Israel and Palestine all have a profound background of great powers. For example, if the major powers do not cooperate today in resolving the North Korean nuclear issue and the Iranian nuclear issue, the danger of nuclear proliferation could turn into a catastrophe.

Third, as the role of economic factors soars, competition between major powers (involving markets, natural resources, technology, and talent) has become increasingly intense. At the same time, the momentum of seeking cooperation between countries for the sake of their own security and development interests is also becoming more and more prominent, and this is first and foremost to coordinate economic interests. As a result of the adjustment and running-in, a wide variety of names have emerged, such as "strategic cooperative partnership," "constructive strategic partnership," "comprehensive partnership," "friendly and cooperative partnership," and so on.

Strategic cooperation without being an alliance is a novelty after the Cold War and has become a transitional phenomenon in the establishment of a new international political and economic order and the building of a harmonious world.

Fourth, the possibility of benign interaction between major powers and the avoidance of vicious interaction is increasing. When meeting with the former ** Nixon of the United States, he said: "....Relations between countries should be considered primarily in the light of the strategic interests of the countries themselves.

focus on its own long-term strategic interests, while also respecting the interests of the other side". Here, he provides a theoretical basis for positive interactions.

The so-called benign interactive relationship is a new type of relationship that benefits each other and is not hostile to each other, and contradictions and differences should be resolved through dialogue and consultation, rather than resorting to force or the threat of force. Positive interaction means that bilateral relations are not directed against third countries, triangular relations are not united against one side against the other, and bloc politics is completely out of step with the trend of the post-Cold War era.

Fifth, benign interaction has an inherent regularity, which is composed of three links: starting point, process and result. The starting point is to safeguard the interests of each other, and at the same time must respect the interests of other countries, both of which are indispensable. Process - competition and cooperation coexist, contradiction and compromise coexist.

Cooperation should be honest, compromise should be moderate, competition should be disciplined, and friction should not lead to confrontation. The result is a win-win, win-win situation, and it is not possible to gain any unilateral benefit.

On the surface: peace and development. Actually: secretly competing.

There are different types and levels of countries in the world, and their levels of economic development, national intensity, and international influence vary greatly. As a result, relations between countries are also complex. The current world's major power relations follow a pluralistic and multi-layered model.

On the one hand, sovereign states interact in a complex manner on a regional and global scale. On the other hand, the evolution of human history and the background of the times has led to changes in leadership and influence among the world's major powers, thus promoting changes in the pattern of relations between major powers.

With the continuous development and change of the international community, the overall pattern of international politics has changed, and the rise of emerging countries and the redistribution of international power have made the competition and cooperation among the world's major powers more complicated. The rapid rise of China and India is typical of this change. In this new pattern, the relations between major powers have developed from a dualistic structure to a diversified one, and the United States, China, Russia, the European Union, India, Brazil, and other major countries in the world have different degrees of interaction and cooperation, which also means that the relations between major powers have expanded from separate military, security, economic, and geopolitical issues to more diversified and broader issues.

China has become the world's second-largest economy. China's role in the international system is becoming increasingly important. Since the onset of the 2008 financial crisis, China has been one of the engines of global economic growth.

As a great power, China has ample potential to lead the way in correcting the unbalanced and unstable development of the world economy. At the same time, China pays close attention to Asian security cooperation and regional stability, and actively promotes regional cooperation and norm-building on the basis of existing cooperation mechanisms. China** actively promotes cooperation and development in the Asia-Pacific region and the world.

Although the relations between major countries in the world are facing multiple major challenges, there are still ample opportunities and challenges to cooperate and win-win in the multilateral framework in the future to jointly address global challenges such as climate change and public health.

In general, with the acceleration of economic globalization and the intensification of various global problems, countries are becoming more and more closely connected and interacting. The world's major powers have bent over complex cooperation and competition. The pattern of relations between major powers has undergone profound changes, and the interaction between major powers has expanded from purely political and economic issues to more diversified and broader issues, which also provides more opportunities for the reform and adjustment of global governance.

At present, it is true that there are one superpower and many powers, but the trend is not necessarily the decline of one superpower, and the so-called multipolarization of the world is only the goal pursued by many superpowers, and under the current circumstances, ZTE of one superpower is also very probable.

At present, it is a superpower, that is, one superpower, the United States, and many other countries and regions that are recovering or rising: China, Russia, the European Union, Japan, India, Brazil, ......

The trend is the decline of a superpower and the multipolarization of the world.