Is annihilation the same as vanishing from a philosophical point of view

It's not the same. Noticeable differences.

Elimination: Emphasizing the agency, willpower, and willpower of the subject, emphasizing the subject.

Fading: Pure Facts. The absence of a body and its embodiment of agency and willpower.

I'm just going to make a point of view from its own point of view.

Elimination, we can take the initiative to do this action and consciously make something disappear, with a certain revolutionary, and even some viciousness.

Disappearing, we will also disappear, and so will other things, but this is something that we cannot change humanly, and we are helpless about it, with a pessimistic, tragic, and even sublime feeling. And what disappears will also make people feel fragile and beautiful and pure because it is irretrievable and irretrievable.

From a philosophical point of view, the theoretical definition of philosophy is a theorized and systematic world view, which is a generalization and summary of natural knowledge, social knowledge, and thinking knowledge.

Therefore, philosophy can be said to be a kind of cognition that seeks harmony between materialism and idealism.

First of all, let's analyze the gradual understanding that vanishing, that is, disappearing, passing, is a phenomenon of natural weakening, the process of a certain object or event slowly moving towards extinction under the catalysis of time, and annihilation, that is, disappearance, destruction is the forcible destruction of something or something under the action of an external force, and the purpose of destroying it directly before it disappears naturally, and the difference between them is that one belongs to natural extinction, the other is perishment under the action of external forces, and there is another point: it is okay to destroy things that have not yet begun, but disappearance can only happen to things that have already begun or exist.

And then we can use the dialectic to give an example: a person's life is limited, in his life, life is a process of disappearance, every day, every year, his life will slowly disappear, and some people's lives have encountered, his life may end hastily early, the difference is that the difference between ** is time, the other is people, so the conclusion is that vanishing is also a kind of annihilation, it is time that destroys our life, that is to say, in fact, vanishing is only a state of annihilation, and extinction is a big definition It contains a variety of different things or things, different ways of destroying another thing or thing, and its behavior is unpredictable, so it can be collectively called annihilation, for example, a person does not know when his life ends, just like a person may encounter a ** in his life but does not know when it will begin.

So to conclude that, philosophically speaking, annihilation and disappearance are the same meaning, because they both result in destruction and the same unpredictability, except that vanishing is just a form of existence.

Human beings do not bring anything with them, and death does not take anything with them.

I don't understand, what is there to fear about death.

Schopenhauer was rubbish, harming others and himself.

Landlord, your question is very interesting, I tried to say it, I almost forgot about it.

False, contradiction is universal, it is a combination of opposites and unity of things, it exists objectively, and it cannot be eliminated.

Contradictions exist throughout the development process of things, and contradictions cannot be eliminated.

The function of building a harmonious socialist society is to alleviate contradictions, but not to eliminate contradictions.

Landlord,It seems that you already know the truth.,It seems that there is no point in us continuing to lie to you.。。。

I'll tell you the truth of the whole thing! ：：

There is something that you can call "God" for the time being, creating the whole virtual "world", in fact, you are the only one in the world, and the other "people" exist to deceive you, and everything you come into contact with is deceiving you, including me.

For example, do you think the so-called United States, Japan, and Africa really exist???

All you know about these countries is told to you through television, the Internet, people's rumors, etc., when you really want to travel to the United States, Japan, Africa, the "gods" are temporarily created, and when you go, they disappear in an instant, leaving some only information, and you don't have to create a whole "country" that big, just a place you can see in the city you arrive.

Actually, it's very easy for God to do this, the amount of information required is not as great as you think, and now you are looking at the computer screen, and the thing behind you is not there at this time, just provide some sounds, smells, etc., hehe.

Do you think your body really exists? Maybe you're just a brain, maybe you don't even have a brain, just a bunch of "consciousness", you might say, "I think, therefore I am", even if I'm just a bunch of "consciousness", "I" still exists!

But I would say, are you sure that you are "thinking" and not something else?

You may still have a feeling like you are "amazing", you are the only real being, you feel as if you are the god of this world, but the tragedy is that you can't get the supreme power like a king, simply put, you can't get the happiness that matches your "status", and even you can only suffer and enjoy like an ordinary person, and even live a life that is not as good as other ordinary and unreal "people", and you have nothing to do about it, so this is the pitiful part, Your only consolation is the similar useless vanity of "only I am real, everyone else is illusory", and at this moment, do you find your "only real" status useful? Does it make sense? Can it be eaten as a meal?

What's even more tragic is that even if I'm the only "person" who tells you that the world is illusory, you can't really believe what I'm saying is right or wrong, and it can never be proven.

Now that you have had doubts, God has created a topic called "Brain in a Vat" to continue to confuse you, you can search for "Brain in a Vat".

What you call "human beings are intelligent beings of higher life." So survival and reproduction are not the most important point, but this kind of virtual philosophy can also make people think of self-destruction. Why do you have self-destructive thoughts?

Do you want to die to confirm your suspicions? If so, I think it's ridiculous, can you prove it when you're dead?

Your philosophy naturally exists with your existence, because you are the carrier of your philosophy, and your philosophy naturally contains your space and time, but the existence of your time and space is not the existence of other people's time and space, and they can influence and bioize each other, but it is a very difficult thing to unify your thoughts, and the soil for the existence of your philosophy depends on your own cultivation.

When you don't exist, for you, the world really doesn't exist, and for others, the world continues until they die, of course, the later world is meaningless to you, you only exist where you want to be. (Soy sauce).

Haha, it's still idealism, philosophy, there is no need to pursue who is right and who is wrong, the textbooks tell us that materialism is correct, because Marx and Engels thought so. But I think it's worth affirming having your own ideas

The world itself is a spirit, it does not belong to your and my thoughts, why does matter exist, it belongs to a spirit that is different from the one produced in this universe, but your and my thoughts are parallel to this spirit, it seems to be very shielded, but it is not contradictory, because your and my thoughts can also create their own substances, but they cannot control their thoughts, and other people's thoughts cannot be controlled but can be influenced. The Internet is mindless, but it has everything because of you and me.

Hehe, you're right, but you're also wrong.

You no longer exist, and your universe will disappear with your wear and tear.

Remember: it's not the whole universe, it's just your universe, because one person is one universe. Therefore, Wang Yangming once said, "Now that a dead person is dead, where are his heavens, earth, ghosts and gods?" ”

Your original view, in the case of Western philosophy, can easily lead to solipsism.

Your point of view seems to be very shallow, at least it seems to me that Heidegger's existentialism is deeper than yours. He also believed that the irrational activity of human consciousness is the true essence. So, if you want to enrich your thinking further, it's best to study the ideas of Schopenhauer, Heidegger, Jasbeth, Jean Paul Sartre, and be sure to study the ideas of other philosophical schools, otherwise, you will be like the one in Plato who lives forever in a cave.

How so? Tell me about my life feelings!

When I was a child, I loved to climb up and gaze at the sky at night and watch the stars in the sky, because I firmly believed that that this was my hometown! I love the quiet of darkness because she is so pure, and being in it nourishes the mind.

As I grew older, there were more lights around me, and it seemed that the darkness was far away from me, and I gradually became familiar with my surroundings, forgetting my hometown, and only occasionally looking up at the North Star did I let out a soft sigh.

As time goes by, when I was in college, I gradually realized everything around me, it seems that the previous sensibility is fading, only the emptiness of reason remains, the more things I perceive, the stronger my rationality becomes, and the less sensibility I feel...

If the world is virtual, then there will not be such a big turning point in thought, after all, no matter how good the virtual is, the thought cannot be virtual, and it cannot be changed. For example, a parameter, in the same environment, the result of virtual calculation is the same, but the reality causes different thoughts.

Unless it is a person who creates the world in a dream, you are me, I am him, he is all things, and all things are me and not me.

You're right, everyone will feel this way if they experience it seriously.

And I want to say that your idea and experience is not new at all!

The essence of quantum mechanics is revealing this: the world is there because you are looking.

Buddhism's "color is not different from emptiness, emptiness is not different from color" also expresses this.

It is recommended to watch "The Matrix", you will find the feeling of a soulmate, but this requires you to watch it more than 10 times, and it must be combined with the relevant forums and bars.

What the hell do we know" also look at this, and you will know that the most cutting-edge scientific research is behind you.

You'd better keep that feeling of being in your heart by trusting that you will find something that will leave an indelible mark on your heart, and that feeling will lead you to a higher place.

All I can tell you at the moment is what I believe.

I believe in GA, I believe in CDT information disk.

Everything about the truth ...

That's the world inside of you. You're not Haruhi Suzumiya, are you?

Matter is an objective existence that is not subject to human will, and has objective reality. Facts are the source of objective existence, and people cannot make this objectivity of things disappear only by their own consciousness, even if they lack clever arguments, even if they accept the non-objectivity of facts psychologically, it is only from the perspective of people's own psychology, and facts still exist objectively in this world. It's like if you don't look at a scar in order to relieve the pain, and you mentally hint to yourself that you are not injured, maybe it will reduce the pain a little, but the scar is still there.

Why the connection cannot be extinguished, because the connection has objectivity. Many of the connections you are talking about seem to be eliminated, but in fact they do not eliminate the ties themselves, but only change the conditions for the existence and development of the connections. The relationship between law and connection is the inevitable connection between law and the stable essence in the process of change and development of things.

Connecting and being connected is only a manifestation of the law of the combination of information in the subjective brain, so the connection is premised on a certain subjective thinking. If we change the subjective thinking and connection, we can eliminate the connection between things, so why can't the connection be eliminated?

If there were no humans in this world, or no humans who could make complex associations and associations, would there be any connection between things? For some of the lower animals, and even the higher orangutans and apes, is there any complex or intrinsic connection between things like the sun, the moon, and the earth?

Laws can be objective, but connections are subjective. So the relationship between law and connection is objective and subjective.

The idea of universal connection is that there is always a connection between things, not necessarily a physical connection, but also a legal connection, a moral connection, and this connection is eliminated, and there are other connections. Causal connection is also a kind of connection, and causal connection is what we call a law. Mathematically the independent variable, the dependent variable.

Everything is one source, so there must be a connection.

Everything has one source, so there must be laws.