Is DC and DSLR used the same?

The two are completely different, not something that can be explained in one or two sentences, and SLR is not easy to play. It takes a long time to master the correct **, and you have to pay attention to hand tremor, white balance, aperture, **compensation or something, and more. DC's functional SLR is basically there, but most of them don't support video, but I seem to have heard that some machines now have them, but I haven't seen them.

It's better to enter a DSLR, it's a lot of fun, and you can be shocked by the wide aperture bokeh background.

There are similarities, SLR also has an automatic mode, press the shutter can be, when let this use one is sorry to buy the SLR, the other is that the ** shot is not much different from DC. However, it is not very difficult to use SLR, it is recommended to take a look at the theoretical knowledge first, have a certain understanding, and if you have the opportunity to use the real machine in the future, it will also be of great help!

No, the operation is basically the same, the technical requirements are the same, there is no need to be particular about the details, and the feel will be much better than your current telephoto.

Brother, to give you an analogy: your question is like asking, I can push a trolley now, can I drive a big truck?

The gap between DC and SLR is not something that can be said in a few words, you can search the Internet for the answer, and it is best to buy a SLR to feel it.

The only thing that has in common with DSLRs and DC operations is that some SLRs have a full fool file. Most SLRs can also use the P file, and when used, it is basically fully automatic metering, similar to DC performance. The rest is basically incomparable.

The operation is basically the same, but the weight of the SLR is heavier, and there are more problems, such as: the choice of lens.

There is also the fact that the post-SLR is mainly a lens, to see if you are a momentary interest, if it is a momentary interest, it is recommended to play DC

With a DSLR, you want to make a good movie, if you can't make a good movie, you want to change the lens, if you change the lens, you have to collect the style, you have to survive in the wild, of course, you have to buy a car.

It's very different! One sentence or two sentences are not clear, can DC change the lens?

Can a DSLR turn off the shutter sound?

Let's understand the area of photosensitive materials, and then talk about the difference between the two, okay?

But if you want to say get started, it's easy for people who have been playing cameras for a long time to get started, but you say that you have played a good SLR, that's not everyone can do it, and the SLR is much heavier than the DC, and it requires stronger wrist strength.

In general, there are so many more things to consider when using a DSLR than when using a DC!

SLR stands for professionalism.

It is recommended to go to photography forums such as Hummingbird and Mowgli to have a good exchange.

It's not a sentence or two to say clearly, but there is a DC foundation, and it's easy to get started with a DSLR, it's not difficult, the key in jargon is the head behind the lens.

SLR operation is difficult, but if someone who uses it well, it will definitely be good; If you don't use it well, it's better than DC

Personally, I recommend that if you want to buy a DSLR, choose Nikon's low-end SLR machine, which is good. For example, d80

Borrow a few DSLRs to take a few **, and then ask yourself.

DC is the abbreviation of Digital Camera, and cameras with CCD and COMS as image sensors can be called DC, that is, "digital camera".

As early as the 60s of the 20th century, the early products began the research and development of CCD chips, developed digital cameras for the aerospace industry, and sent space from space to the ground through satellite systems.

In 1998, the digital camera developed greatly, and in 1998, Fujifilm launched the first 100,000-level (1.5 million pixels) lightest and most popular digital camera, the NEPIX700 digital camera. Canon collaborated with Kodak Corporation to develop the first DSLR cameras with LCD monitors, the EOSD2000 and EOSD6000.

I'm a photography graduate to help you analyze it.

First, let's take a look at 3 options.

SLR is undoubtedly the best imaging, followed by mirrorless and then high-end DC, but the image quality is also proportional to the weight.

If you have money, I recommend a SLR and a mirrorless, because just like a notebook and a netbook, the direction of the two things is different, and the SLR is more suitable for creation. Micro mirrorless is suitable for taking pictures of some things that you still have some small ideas when traveling. As for the high-end DC, I suggest not to consider it, the CCD is small, and the high ISO has many restless points, and it is actually not much lighter than the micro-mirror.

If you want to do something about the real and the real or anything else, you can't do it. If you want to use DC, it's better to shoot it with a mobile phone, and now it's enough to record the image of a better mobile phone.

If you don't have money, you can only choose one of SLR and micro mirrorless, then consider whether you want to record more points or create more points when traveling. If you record more points, I recommend mirrorless, and if you create, I recommend SLR. Ok, you look at the points hoho

There are differences and connections between these products, and which one is better, depending on the cost performance.

DC is an abbreviation for Digital Camera, which literally means digital camera. Because digital cameras were originally small, portable home camera models, the conventional DC became synonymous with small home digital cameras.

With the development of electronic technology, single-lens reflex cameras, which require high imaging quality, have also been digitally attacked. DSLR cameras require complete control over not only pixels, colors, but also camera aperture, shutter, sensitivity, and more. Canon proudly named its DSLR camera after EOS (Electro Optical System).

The high degree of electronic integration has brought the SLR to a new glory, but also brought a new crisis. Sony, a giant of digital equipment, has taken the electronic integrated control camera a step further, retaining the advantages of interchangeable lenses, removing expensive and complex optical viewfinder systems including reflectors and pentaprisms, compressing the volume and weight of the camera, and improving the cost performance. This is the birth of mirrorless.

Technically, mirrorless mirrorless has achieved or even surpassed the imaging effect of SLR, but in terms of framing, it still limits the photographer's subjective play.

At present, these three types of cameras have the following characteristics:

The DC is lightweight, simple, and inexpensive, and is only used as a general video recording.

The SLR is high, with image quality and creation as the call, attracting photographers and photography enthusiasts.

The advantages of the two are the lightness of DC, the high image quality and interchangeable lens of the SLR, and it has become a unique new choice.

However, technology is constantly advancing, the difference and definition between the three are also constantly fused with each other, in the professional SLR, liquid crystal screen (LCD) has become the standard, in small digital cameras, higher pixel sensors are also constantly updated, in order to change the disadvantages of LCD viewing, the introduction of electronic viewfinders, etc., the future of the camera industry is full of good shows.

Speaking from the ** above.

The DC class is the cheapest, the micro single is the second, and the SLR is the most expensive (pan analogy).

In terms of performance, SLR and mirrorless are juxtaposed, and DC is the easiest.

In terms of cultural pursuit, SLR still has a strong advantage. With the development of social economy, cultural demand and consumption have become important market factors. Therefore, it can also be listed as a major component of performance.

From the user's point of view.

If it is a commercial job, market research, DC is the most cost-effective;

The fashion entertainment industry prefers micro-mirrors, with face and lining, ** is not the most concerned;

For professional photographers, SLR is their confidence and dependence.

The specific choice depends on the buyer's own wallet and spending propensity.

LX3, it's very light and easy to take, and it has the blood of Laika.

I've really studied this thoroughly, and the photographic technique is pretty good. It's also cheap.

The disadvantage is that it is not as stylish as a DSLR.

I personally don't like it, and the cost performance is extremely low. It's not light, is it so convenient to have a few lenses?

It's really so strong that I want to play photography, and it's not too late to get a D90 (SLR).

Since you are pursuing picture quality, you still want to be SLR, Pentax KX white is recommended, you go to check, the picture quality is good, the body is anti-shake, especially suitable for women. The portion size is also not heavy. **Very cheap, around 4000. Take pictures with it, it's very stylish.

If you want to travel, you have to have a better imaging effect, and the SLR tourism must be too heavy, and it is recommended to do it micro-mirrorlessly.

Olympus EP1 is now very cost-effective, and you can buy a fixed focus set for 5000 yuan. Very affordable.

Of course, the choice is reflex,550D is very suitable for novices to get started,Clear picture quality,The camera function is very powerful,The comprehensive function of the new product is strong。 A little more than 5k, ** is also suitable

There is a smaller volume in the mirrorless case, the same as the card machine, you can change the lens, you can take a look at Sony's nex5c, it sells very well, many places are out of stock, and the cost performance is very good. Add one at around 5000.

First of all, travel, SLR is too heavy and inappropriate, the first one is vetoed and then, depending on how much you invest, whether there is follow-up investment, playing micro-singles is the same as playing single-lens reflex, there is no point in buying micro-singles if you don't change the lens. . .

If there is, of course, it's good to be a micro mirror, if not, you can only choose a high-end DC, LX5 has improved a lot on the basis of LX3, and Canon G12 is also worth buying

You can also shoot with professional results".

This is very abstract... What is a professional effect... If you want to shoot well, the technology is the key, and the camera is not too bad. . . The focus should be on technology ...

I was thinking about it between the LX5 and the E-PL1, ** the same, both 3900 with us! After comparing the image quality, do not hesitate to e-PL1!! Like you, I originally wanted to choose a single-lens reflex, but I fancied Pentax's KX, but then I felt that it was too tiring to go out to play, and my classmates said that it was better to buy a card!

At present, the high-end DC ** is not much different from a single battery, but the picture quality is definitely not as good as that of a single battery, even if a single battery is used with a sleeve!

I bought the Olympus e-pl1 and used the pullover! Take a look, I hope it helps you!

I feel that the mirrorless can meet you in terms of volume and image quality, the image quality of the mirrorless is definitely better than the LX3, and the lens is small and easy to carry.

Digital Still Camera (DSC), is an abbreviation for Digital Camera, also known as Digital Camera. A digital camera is a type of camera that uses an electronic sensor to convert an optical image into electrical zd subdata.

The light enters the camera through the lens or lens group, and is converted into a digital signal through the digital camera imaging element, and the digital signal is stored in the storage device through the image computing chip.

There are many types of cameras, and in the case of digital series, the categories include the following (there may be overlapping areas).

A brief review of the various types of machines:

Digital point-and-shoot cameras, common digital DCs on the market, have fewer automatic functions, such as Canon IXUS 220HS and so on.

The digital telephoto camera is relatively large in size, characterized by a relatively large lens zoom magnification, a universal machine, and it is good to shoot anything.

Digital high-end cameras, relatively high-end digital cameras, with quasi-professional control and excellent image quality, such as Canon G12, Sony RX100 and so on.

A digital rangefinder camera combines the portability of a digital camera with the advantages of a rangefinder camera, such as the Fujifilm X100

The lenses of the above cameras are not interchangeable.

Interchangeable lens digital camera (mirrorless), the size is relatively small, the lens can be replaced, and now the camera is hot.

Interchangeable lens electronic viewfinder digital camera (single electric), the volume is comparable to that of a single-lens reflex, but it is electronically viewed, the cost is relatively low, and the cost performance is high.

Interchangeable lens reflex digital camera (SLR), traditional SLR, large size, expensive, looks more professional, suitable for enthusiasts.

Advantages: mirrorless: can change the lens, the image quality is better.

SLR: You can change the lens No shutter lag Imaging***DC: easy to carry No follow-up investment.

Disadvantages: mirrorless: there is a shutter time lag, there is also a follow-up investment, and it is not very convenient to carry the SLR: large and heavy, and the follow-up investment is large (close to the bottomless pit).

DC: There is a shutter lag and the imaging quality is poor.

Note: Mirrorless is equivalent to a rangefinder machine in the film era, and it has no place at all under the attack of SLR and fool machine, and now it is a zombie resurrection.

From the perspective of continuous shooting speed, the top SLR is better than the mirrorless and better than the DC, but the difference between the ordinary SLR and the mirrorless is not big. Why do some people say that mirrorless has the problem of shutter time lag? The mirrorless shutter lag is shorter than that of the SLR, and the SLR is framed.

Disagree with the views of the people upstairs. If it's a real flagship DC, the gap is not very big (your one is not a flagship at all), but DC is characterized by ultra-high convenience and ease of use, this DC doesn't need to adjust the aperture shutter or the like, it's easier to get started, DSLR Although the imaging quality is extremely high, you need to learn the basics first - you can't always use its "automatic" mode, and it's relatively large, sometimes it's more troublesome!!

The basic gap upstairs has been mentioned, and I want to talk about this DC. Not at all a "flagship DC" :

1.High pixels are not always a good thing, and when the CMOS (image sensor, equivalent to film) area is the same, the lower the pixels, the smaller the pixel density, which can greatly reduce current noise and significantly improve image quality.

2.This is a "periscope" type lens, although the body has become thinner, but the optical zoom is also smaller (only 4x), and because of this, the wide-angle end is also relatively poor (25-100), so the distortion of the lens is not to be discussed. Besides, its floating aperture is also very ordinary, not much different from the average entry-level DC.

3.The shutter is not good: 1600 1, there will be some discomfort when shooting objects moving at high speed.

4.Don't believe in optical image stabilization,Even the VR of the Nikkor lens below 4000 yuan is a decoration,The sensor behind this focal plane is almost useless,Increasing the shutter speed and aperture is the right solution。

5.Finally, don't believe in overly fancy features, these are "deceptive", buying a camera is not buying functions, it is buying image quality!! This kind of thing.,PS it's all done.。。。 The focus is also so-so.,At least it shouldn't be cross.。。。

So,If you want to choose DC, get a real flagship(It's also very professional,Full manual mode,I use D3S + Leica V-Lux 2,Sometimes it's really super inconvenient to use SLR,Just use Kaha,Imaging quality has advantages - Laika has better control over color),Like Leica (all right),Panasonic LX5,Panasonic FZ100 and a certain XX of Ricoh - if the imaging gap is there,It's much better than the plastic head,And the convenience is not mentioned!! **It's also fairer, and you don't need to buy lenses.