The thief was killed by the villagers for stealing a child in the village, do the villagers need to

The thief stole a child in the village and was beaten to death by the villagers, and the villagers must also be responsible, and it is okay to defend themselves, but they cannot be punished in their own way. What's more, this thief also lost his life, and in this case, the villagers must have broken the law. When we encounter this situation, we must learn to call the police, use the law to punish this kind of person, and don't put yourself in it for a thief.

1. Villagers need to take responsibility

When it comes to human traffickers, everyone hates them, because it is because of the existence of these traffickers that so many families are broken here, and some villagers are more vigilant when they see unfamiliar faces in the village, and they are afraid of encountering human traffickers, especially the kind of people who want to take their children away, and the villagers will choose to stop them after they find out, and some people will choose to beat him in order to vent their anger, but they didn't expect to kill the thief too hard, in this case, the villagers also need to be responsible. <>

We can go to legitimate defense, when the traffickers take the children, the villagers can go up and stop them, and they can go to beat and scold, but after stopping the other person, they can't do other harmful acts. We must make proper use of these powers to protect our legitimate rights and interests. However, in this incident, the thief was at fault first, so the responsibility of the villagers will be relatively small.

3. After stopping the thief, learn to hand it over to the police

After we find a human trafficker, we must choose to call the police to stop him and wait patiently for the police to arrive, don't let yourself go to jail for such a trafficker, it's really not worth it. Don't ignore the law for the sake of venting your anger for a while, everyone has the same rights, everyone has to obey the law, so you must think carefully before doing things, and I hope that everyone can take care of their children and avoid them being abducted by human traffickers.

In this case, the villagers are responsible, the thief steals the children in the village, which is a kind of aggression against others, and the villagers beat him in normal defense, but if the thief is killed, it is excessive defense, and this situation needs to be criminally responsible according to the criminal law.

After all, the behavior of the villagers is already excessive defense, which has caused very serious harm to the parties, and no one can deprive others of their lives at will, as long as the threat to the lives of the parties is mostly illegal.

Villagers need to be responsible, although it is illegal for a thief to steal a child, but a villager who beats a thief to death is guilty of intentional homicide.

I think if there is some head-on conflict and attack between the thief and the smart, then such behavior is justified and generally not responsible.

Acts that do not fall under the category of justifiable self-defense are already suspected of excessive self-defense and have resulted in the offence of intentional injury. Of course, you need to be responsible.

It is not justifiable self-defense. It must be responsible, and this is already a suspected homicide.

If the thief steals a child in the village and is killed by the villagers, the key is to see whether there is resistance, if in the process of preventing the thief from stealing the child, the thief has endangered the safety of the villagers themselves, and the villagers accidentally injured the thief to death is a legitimate defense, if the thief has stopped the criminal behavior and the villagers still beat the thief to death, then the villagers are liable for intentional injury, and the most serious sentence is the same punishment as homicide.

This matter depends on the situation, and I think it is not a legitimate defense, and it can be stopped in time when the thief has lost the motive to commit the crime, and this should be held accountable.

Of course, it is justified defense, and there is no need to bear any responsibility, because it is completely reasonable and legal to do so.

Which eye did you see that you were beaten to death by the villagers? Obviously, he fell to his death in a panic when he ran away.

Those who cannot be lynched must of course deal with the person who beats someone, even if it is just a situation.