What are your thoughts on fairness and justice?

There is no absolute fairness, only relative fairness, as you said, public rental housing and commercial housing, they must be well, the idea is different, commercial housing, his money must be the same as the money from public rental housing, so they are not sure that they are psychologically unwilling to let public rental housing and commercial housing enjoy the same, that is, the amount, treatment, so there will be Oh, their Western Jin Dynasty idea This is very normal, think about it, is this the truth? If commercial housing and public rental housing enjoy the same treatment, then for the owners of commercial housing, they feel unfair and unjust, because they spend the same money as public rental housing, if they enjoy the same treatment, they feel that the money they buy commercial housing may be the amount, very, very loss, so they may be reluctant, and for them, it is also unfair, but for public rental housing, if they enjoy the same treatment as commercial housing, Maybe they also feel that it is unfair and unjust for them, this is a relative, there is no absolute fairness and justice, so the world depends on how you understand it, I hope it is really useful, I hope it can help you.

There is no absolute fairness and justice, only improper ways of doing things.

Do everything to think about what your purpose is, and then think about how to achieve your goal through reasonable methods, don't do useless quarrels and justifications.

Everything has two sides, there is no absolute fairness in the world, there is no absolute unfairness, it is the beginning of unfairness from birth, some people have fine clothes and food, some people do not have enough food, but God has given all people life and it is fair, and there are different views on fairness in different people's hearts.

Justice and fairness are not the same concept, but are different from the concepts that refer primarily to whether or not the actual human condition is taken into account.

There is no absolute fairness and justice, we just do not make fairness and justice relatively speaking.

There are rules for fairness and justice.

It's all relative.

Subordinate to the overall situation, the individual is subordinate to the collective and national interests.

We can't limit our own interests to fairness and justice

Everyone hopes that something happens and that it will be handled fairly and justly, but the facts are not necessarily satisfactory.

There's a lot of thought in there.

Fairness, equality, no favoritism, no selfishness.

Source of the idiom: The fourth fold of Yuan Sun Zhongzhang's "Survey of the Turban": "As long as the people of the whole Great Trace Bureau are decent, they can be fair and upright and spread by all people." ”

Synonyms of fairness and integrity: fairness and selflessness See " impartiality ".

Idiom grammar: as a predicate, a definite; It refers to being a fair person.

Degree of Commonality: Commonly used idioms.

Affection. Color: imitation pure praise idiom.

Idiom structure: Joint idiom.

Year of generation: Ancient idiom.

The difference between fairness and justice is that if it is fair, it should be an agreement that can be reached on the basis of negotiation, concession, etc., on the basis of both parties. Impartiality is impartial, standing outside of both sides, and things cannot be measured subjectively.

1. The interpretation of justice in the "Etymology" is: "impartiality, integrity"; The explanation of integrity is: "impartial, upright"; The explanation for fairness is succinct: "impartiality".

2. The two concepts of justice and fairness are divided into broad and narrow senses

The concepts of justice and fairness in a broad sense are common words that have similar meanings and can be used universally. However, the concepts of justice and fairness in the broad sense should not be applied to formal settings.

The two concepts of justice and fairness in the narrow sense, that is, in the strict sense, especially at the theoretical level, have their own clear meanings, and there are some obvious differences between the two.

Social justice means "giving everyone what he or she deserves"; The so-called social fairness refers to treating people or things "equally". Obviously, justice has a clear "value orientation", which focuses on the "basic value orientation" of society and emphasizes the legitimacy of this value orientation.

Fairness, on the other hand, has an obvious "instrumentality", which emphasizes the "same scale" of measurement standards, that is, the same measure of all people or everything, or the emphasis on equal treatment, in order to prevent different standards for different people and different things. As for whether the scale itself is reasonable and legitimate, fairness is not considered.

Therefore, whatever is just must be fair, but what is fair is not necessarily just. This is the most important difference between justice and fairness.