Is it illegal for the owner to claim the lost property and be asked for by the other party?

Clause. 1. The villagers in the next village have the obligation to return.

Clause. Second, it is not illegal for villagers to open their mouths and pay appropriate fees. But 2,000 yuan is obviously too high. It can be considered that during this lost period, the other party will give a certain amount of remuneration within the scope of the necessary expenses such as forage and manual management.

Clause. 3. If it is not handled well, it is okay to call the police or file a civil lawsuit.

Local netizen Mr. Dai encountered such a thing. According to reports, he accidentally lost his bag when he went out to play that day. Just as he was anxiously looking for the bag, a strange ** called, saying that he had found the bag, and agreed that Mr. Dai would pick it up at a time and place, but the additional condition was to pay 200 yuan for "hardship", plus two packs of cigarettes.

Although there is not much cash in the bag, there are various consumption cards and bank cards, and most importantly, various documents, if you lose it, it is very troublesome to reissue. Thinking so, Mr. Dai still met the other party's request and retrieved the bag.

Hualu.com. I don't understand, is this kind of gold picking still a traditional virtue? Mr. Dai said that returning the lost property and asking for remuneration made him feel very depressed, and he always felt that his heart was not good.

It is quite common for lost items to be returned for a fee.

In fact, the topic of "paid return of lost property" has aroused everyone's attention and discussion many years ago, and in recent years, in the Internet and ** reports, the topic and controversy about "paid return of lost property" have often appeared.

For example, in June 2005, Xiao Lu, a college graduate, accidentally forgot his purse containing his graduation certificate, degree certificate, teaching qualification certificate, and some award certificates in a taxi, and he did not record the license plate number. After the notice was repeated by the local radio station, someone called** saying that the item had been found, but asked Xiao Lu to pay 1,000 yuan to return it. Xiao Lu Dong scraped together to borrow 400 yuan.

In the afternoon, the man arrived, emphasizing that less than 1,000 yuan could not be returned. Xiao Lu had no choice but to go to the nearby police station to call the police, but ** did not file a case. Xiao Lu had to negotiate with the middle-aged man repeatedly.

Later, the man saw that Xiao Lu really couldn't come up with the money, so after accepting 400 yuan, he returned the lost property to Xiao Lu.

Another example is that in 2013, Mr. Zhang, a citizen of Beijing, accidentally lost a mobile phone in the car while taking a taxi. Later, after Mr. Zhang got in touch with his brother, his brother repeatedly hinted that he should be paid, and Mr. Zhang finally paid 500 yuan to get the phone back.

Another example, in July this year, a mother and son were on the bus.

It is not illegal to ask the other party for money to get back the lost property, but if you want too much, it is unreasonable. If the negotiation fails, then the only way to solve it is to ask the relevant departments to help solve it.

Appropriate remuneration is to be given, and there are provisions in civil law, and the behavior of the other party is called "management without cause", and the cost paid as a result can be claimed. Both economic and labor. As for 2,000 yuan, it is a little more, unless he has proof that it did cost so much.

Go to court. However, when you file a lawsuit, if the other party denies that the cow is yours, how can you prove it?

The other party's asking price lacks legal basis, and you can skip paying the $2,000.

The other party should return your cattle, otherwise, you can call the police to deal with it. **Will support your request.

When he went to the police station to report the case, he immediately returned it, and he would not give him a penny, and the condition he put forward was that it was illegal, and he would be detained if he didn't get it right.

The other party needs to pay a price for you to keep it, you can ask for the necessary expenses, the two parties negotiate to settle, if you feel that the negotiation fails, you can go to the court to sue, the other party's illegal encroachment is unjust enrichment, but it is reasonable to pay a certain amount.

It depends on how much ** he wants back? If it's in moderation, it should be allowed by law.

The property rights section of the Civil Code stipulates that the lost property shall be returned to the right holder. When the right holder collects the lost property, it shall pay the necessary expenses for the custody of the lost property to the finder or the relevant department. Therefore, there is no provision for the statutory right to remuneration for the people who found the tombs.

However, if the owner offers a reward or agrees to pay a reward, it should be fulfilled. If the finder clearly knows that the property was lost by another person, and asks for property from the other party under the pretext of not giving it to the owner, it is an act of "extortion," and if the value of the lost property reaches the standard for filing a case for the crime of "extortion," the case may be filed as the crime of extortion.

According to Article 317 of the Civil Code, when the right holder collects the lost property, it shall pay the necessary expenses for the custody of the lost property to the finder or the relevant department. Where the rights holder offers a reward for finding the lost property, it shall perform its obligations in accordance with the promise when collecting the lost property.