Is the fetus considered a person , and is it a crime to take the initiative to kill it?

Belongs, not illegal but a little cruel, if the fetus is not healthy, it must be beaten, as a parent is helpless, but it hurts the body, it is recommended that women must learn to protect themselves.

Of course, the fetus is also a human being and a life, but if it is actively killed, there is no relevant law saying that it is illegal, so such a fact does not constitute a criminal act.

The fetus has already formed in its womb and already has its own sensory abilities, which is already considered a crime, after all, it is a small life.

In medicine, a fetus that has developed to a certain extent should have certain vital signs, but in law, the fetus is not a person in the legal sense, so the behavior of ** does not constitute intentional homicide. Let's take a look at what the law says?

In law, the rights of a natural person begin at birth and end at death. According to the provisions of China's Civil Code and relevant laws, natural persons enjoy various civil rights since birth, including the right to life and health, personality rights, property rights, etc., and these rights are protected by law, but the acquisition of these rights is counted from birth, and the fetus is still in the mother's womb and has not yet been born, so it does not have these rights.

Therefore, the fetus that is still in the mother's womb does not belong to the human being in the legal sense.

Homicide in law refers to the intentional and unlawful deprivation of the life of another person, and the "person" here is the natural person mentioned above, that is, only after birth can he have the subject qualification of a natural person in the legal sense.

As mentioned earlier, the fetus is not a human being in the legal sense, therefore, ** is naturally not legally considered homicide.

It should be noted that although ** is not considered homicide in law, if others infringe on a pregnant woman and cause a miscarriage, at this time, it is the legal rights of the pregnant woman who are infringed, and the pregnant woman has the right to pursue the civil liability or even criminal liability of the perpetrator in accordance with the provisions of the law, but the subject of rights here is the pregnant woman, not the fetus.

In addition, although a person's civil rights begin at birth and end at death, according to the provisions of the Civil Code, if the fetus is not born and an inheritance event occurs, then according to the provisions of the law, it is necessary to reserve the necessary share for the fetus that enjoys the right of inheritance after birth, and if the fetus is alive at birth, the original share will be inherited by him, and if it is dead at birth, then the original reserved share will be inherited by the original heir.

The fetus is not yet a human being in the first five or six months; It will not constitute intentional homicide, but it will be very bad for your body.

The fetus is not yet human, and it does not constitute intentional homicide, because the fetus is not yet fully developed.

The fetus is not yet a recognized person in our country, and ** will not constitute the crime of intentional homicide, because the fetus is not yet a complete person.