How to understand where there is no coercion, there is no law ?

There is a law because someone breaks the law, that is, there is oppression. But if the people in a place are very good, there is no compulsion. There is no need for a law.

Moreover, the law is enforced by the violent organs of the state, which is itself a form of coercion. Without coercive law, it does not exist in itself.

Coercion is an act, and with this kind of behavior will slowly form a norm, that is, the law.

Therefore, the absence of coercion is equivalent to the absence of law.

The authority and degree of implementation of the law are more than mandatory, and if there is no mandatory guarantee, the law cannot be called a law.

The law is the standard, the standard is the norm, the implementation of the norm needs to be guided by rewards and punishments, and the punishment needs to be enforced, otherwise it is not called punishment.

Well, I think it means that what belongs to the category of morality is fixed in the form of law, making it mandatory, so that we have to be forced to do something under the constraints of the law, for example, whether it is illegal to die and not save the person who is very hot. But I think it is inappropriate to make morality legally compulsory, morality and law are complementary to each other, they each have their own categories, and some moral things cannot be coerced by law, otherwise they will be chaotic.

Law is the most basic morality. The category of morality encompasses the law, and is far greater than the law.

First, you should gather evidence.

Second, you should go to the labor bureau to sue him.

Third, you should apply for arbitration.

You have to gather evidence!

1) Documentary evidence. Anything written down and work-related can be useful, even if it's a note, receipt, or the like;

2) Audio Evidence. Talk to the boss or the person in charge, play **, and record. Remember to mention more keywords, and be sure that the other party acknowledges that you have worked; It's best to elicit things like "I didn't plan to give you money" and "What if you sue me".

3) Witnesses. This is more difficult, if the workers are all owed wages, it may be better if there are more people; If you want to continue to work, it will be very difficult to testify against you, and it is estimated that it will not be successful.

With evidence, you can go to the labor office to file a complaint. If you can't prove that you've worked, it's useless to sue.

The Anti-Narcotics Law clearly stipulates that the period of compulsory isolation for drug rehabilitation is two years. For persons receiving treatment of drug addiction who need to extend the period of drug rehabilitation, the period of compulsory isolation for drug rehabilitation can be extended for up to one year.

The law is the compulsory embodiment of the law by the state, which relies on state violence to force people to obey.

State coercion refers to the violence of the state, the most concrete embodiment of which includes the army, police, courts, and prisons.

The coercive power of the state is the guarantee for the realization of the law, not the characteristic of the law.

To use a small analogy.

A beats B, and is about to beat B to death, can B protect himself, at this time, a super giant C came, and A was slapped to death, and whoever hit B in the future will be killed by C, and no one will beat B anymore.

A is illegal, B is law, and C is the coercive power of the state.

If the statement has the character of being guaranteed by the coercive power of the state, then it is correct.

The state coercion of the law refers to the nature of the law relying on the coercive power of the state to ensure its implementation and force people to abide by it.

The law relies on the coercive power of the state to ensure its implementation, but the coercive power of the state is not the only force to ensure the implementation of the law. To a certain extent, the implementation of the law must also rely on political, economic, cultural, and other social means to ensure it. The coercive power of the state is only the guarantee force for the implementation of the law, and it does not mean that any process of the implementation of the law requires the intervention of the coercive power of the state.

Therefore, the coercive power of the state of the law is both latent and indirect.

This sentence is wrong, and the coercive power of the state can only be said to be the main force and last resort to ensure the implementation of the law, as explained in the syllabus of the judicial examination"State coercion is not the only force that guarantees the implementation of the law. Legal awareness, moral concepts, and discipline concepts also play an important role in ensuring the implementation of laws.

This is not a matter of jurisprudence, but a very simple question of language. Characteristic is a certain nature, coercive force is a kind of power, is a kind of force of the state to enforce the law, so the law has the characteristics of the state coercive law.

The law itself does not have the coercive power of the state, but there will be violent institutions to ensure the operation of the law, so the law has the coercive power of the state.

The ontology of the law?

The so-called coercion refers to the nature of the law to rely on the guarantee of the state's coercive power to enforce and force the people to abide by it. It's sex.

The fact that it does not have the coercive force of the state means that the law itself does not have coercive force.

It's easy to understand.

The law has national compulsion, which means that it has national compulsion, which is one of the characteristics of law and is a binding force;

The lack of state coercive force refers to the fact that the law itself does not have enforceable force, and the state coercive force refers to the relevant rights of the relevant departments of the state, for example, the court has the right to adjudicate, which is a kind of enforceable force.

Good luck! 09 Successfully passed the exam!

Then I'll tell you a story

Once upon a time there was a child whose name was "Fa".

He is tall and strong, and he shouts at others all day long to do things, which makes people not do it. Everyone said that he was very coercive by the state.

But shouting and shouting, in fact, he won't hit anyone, haha, so everyone says that he doesn't have state coercive power.

The crux of the matter is that the law is not enough on its own.

That's why there is a saying that the law is mandatory by the state, but it does not have the coercive power of the state.

I'll give you an analogy.

Knives can kill and are harmful.

But the knife does not have the ability to kill, and the knife cannot independently and actively hack someone to death.

I don't think there's any need to think about it, just remember it.

Of course, I didn't say that I wanted to get a high score or pursue a high realm.

State coercion is a kind of coercive binding.

State coercive power is a form of enforcement.

Got it?

Next to Xidan Book Building, there are airport buses at the entrance of Fangzhuang Guiyou Building and Caishikou Department Store.