Who can use peony skin to make up a historical story It is necessary to combine the official histo

The official history refers to the biographical history books such as "Historical Records" and "Book of Han". A Chinese history book based on the biography of emperors and recorded by court historians, which is different from folk history. It was first seen in Liang Ruan Xiaoxu's "Formal History" in the Southern Dynasty.

The Book of Sui and the Book of Records of the Sui Dynasty listed the "Historical Records" and "Book of Han" as the official history books with the biography of the emperor as the key link, ranking first among the books of the history department. "History of the Ming Dynasty: Art and Literature" is also based on the biography and chronicle, and is called the official history. During the Qianlong period of the Qing Dynasty, the "Siku Quanshu" determined that the 24 orthodox historical books from the "Historical Records" to the "History of the Ming Dynasty" were the official histories (see the 24th History), and it was determined that those that were not approved by the emperor should not be included.

In 1921, the Beiyang warlord ** added the "New Yuan History", which is collectively known as the Twenty-five History. However, some people did not include the history of the New Yuan Dynasty, but instead listed the "Qing History Manuscript" as one of the 25 histories. Or, if both books are included in the canonical history, twenty-six histories are formed.

The official history often has the will of the country and the emotions of the nation mixed in, when the era or future generations often bend the pen or taboo some words, so it is necessary to look at other such as other histories and miscellaneous histories to certify, otherwise it is inevitable to peep at the leopard, not true.

On the contrary, wild history is generally believed to refer to the history books compiled by private families in ancient times, which is different from the official history books, as opposed to the "official history". In ancient times, there was a saying that "barnyard officials and wild history", and the barnyard officials were also petty officials who recorded folk customs. "Hanshu Art and Literature Chronicles" quotes Ruchun as saying, "Fine rice is barnyard grass, and the streets talk about it, and even the small words are also very small."

The king wants to know the customs of the lane, so he sets up a barnyard official and makes it say". Tang Tortoise Meng's poem "Rewarding the Beauty and Bitter Rain": "In the history of self-love and fame, it is better to talk about the side of the deserted city.

Yuan Sadura "Shangzhao Liang Guogong" poem: "Such a reputation is all over the world, and the history of the world can also be passed on." This kind of record of the style of the alleys, the street talks, and the anecdotes is also called the "barnyard history", such as the "compilation of the history of barnyard in the Ming Season" praised by Lu Xun many times.

The "miscellaneous records" mentioned by Lu Xun are probably "barnyard history" and the like. Barnyard is a wild grass, and the history of barnyard is actually the history of the wild.

The so-called "wild" has two meanings: first, in contrast to the people in the DPRK, it was made by the opposition people (or the lower class of scholars), and it has not been officially approved, let alone "sanctioned", and even banned by the government, not hidden in the temple and official hall, but circulated in the "wild", of course, some of these books have also been circulated in the official hall and have been officially deleted and changed in the circulation; Second, from the point of view of the opposition between elegance and vulgarity, literature and wildness, it is not artificially overly carved, and it is a primitive historical material, although it seems vulgar, but it has originality and authenticity.

Most of the people and events written in the wild history are real people and events. Liu He's "Travels of the Old Remnant" cloud: "Those who are wild in history can also make up for the shortcomings of history."

The name can be entrusted to the false, and the truth is proved by the falsehood. Comparatively speaking, the historical materials of the official history are more reliable, more authoritative and more credible, but due to feudal orthodoxy and other reasons, some things that should have been recorded in the official history have also been deleted. These things have become wild history.

In my opinion, the official history should be more credible, because most of them are fictional and not credible, such as "The Foreign History of the Manchu Dynasty", etc., are all fictional.

Compared with the correct official history, the official history is the historian appointed by the emperor to compile the history book according to the historical materials and conduct research, but there are also hidden truths in the official history, and the wild history is generally an amateur author who records historical stories according to folklore, often including some things that catch the wind and catch the shadows.

The official history is accurate, and a large part of the wild history is ** in folklore, and there is also a certain amount of artistic processing.

The credibility of the canonical and wild histories should be questionable!

For canonical history; In Chinese history, except for the historical records, Han books, and Later Han books, most of the later historical records deviate from objective facts, and some even cover up the historical truth! The courage of the historian of the Spring and Autumn Period (a certain prince usurped power, asked the historian to beautify him, as a result, the historian bluntly wrote, the usurper was killed, his younger brother wrote the usurper again, was killed again, and the other brother still wrote the usurper king, this ruler was helpless) After the Han Dynasty, it was gradually lost, which shows that the credibility of the official history is not high, but there is also a credible official history!

But no history; It's also not entirely reliable, and not every book is worth reading. Some authors are bound by orthodoxy, and often "do not speak out", although he has rich experience, he avoids writing about many things, and does not provide more material than the official history; Some people are entangled in certain historical events, write reminiscences, and always like to put gold on their faces, without any spirit of self-criticism, and naturally it is difficult to write the truth of history; There are also those who write only on hearsay, which is easy to spread falsehoods, and there is still a distance from the truth.

The official history often has to be "revised", and the wild history often includes "stories", and smart people can distinguish the true from the false.

History! It's all written with victory, and after thousands of years, what is the truth, who knows! The official history is officially recognized and authoritative, and although the wild history is a folklore, its reference value is also very high. That's all my personal opinion.

The canon history is the official history.

Wild history is oral transmission or ** kind of things, most of which are fiction.

It depends on the situation, the official history of Confucianism "Twenty-four History" is still more credible, and the credibility of the wild history can also be seen from its "wild" character, there are more legends, so the credibility is not high.

Of course, it is the official history, and there are many things in the wild history, and of course the official history sometimes serves the ruling class. It's not necessarily true

Of course, it's the official history.,A lot of things in the wild history are made up.。。。 There's a lot of folklore...

The canon history is more reliable.

But there is an element of counterfeiting in both.

Do you know why Sima Qian, the author of "Historical Records", was sentenced? It's not that it's written too objectively and offends the emperor of the dynasty. However, Sima Qian did not revise his work because of this. I hope you don't doubt the real history that Sima Qian exchanged for Xiao DD.

Ye Shibai: There are some things that can be written in the official history?

You'll have to deduce the answer you want based on the historical context!

First, the nature is different.

1. The official history is compiled by the government and is authoritative.

2. Wild history refers to the history books compiled by private families in ancient times, which is different from the official history books, and is relatively different from the "official history". In ancient times, there was a saying that "barnyard officials and wild history", and the barnyard officials were also petty officials who recorded folk customs.

Second, the writing time is different.

1. The canonical history is usually revised by the next dynasty.

2. The wild history is compiled in contemporary times, although it seems vulgar, but part of the content is original and authentic.

Third, the research is different.

1. The official history refers to the historical books that are compiled in the style of chronicles and chronicles. The canonical history can be verified, and in general, the canonical history is the most credible.

2. Wild history, no one knows whether it is true or false, it is generally handed down by the people, and there is no book to verify. To put it simply, whether what the wild history said really happened in history is still to be determined, and it is very likely that it is apocryphal.

Wild history is another kind of historical record compared to the official history.

The canonical history is an official document.

It is up to the ruler to decide what to write.

In this regard, there is a certain amount of freedom relative to the wild history.

There aren't too many restrictions.

It can accurately reflect the social situation at that time.

Wild history is passed down among the people.

The canonical history is officially revised.

There are elements of imagination and exaggeration in the wild history, but there is no lack of historical facts.

The official history has deliberately modified and distorted elements in it, but it is relatively comprehensive and coherent.

Wild history is more interesting than authentic. Entertaining over seriousness. Ordinary people in ancient times lacked the necessary means to get in touch with history.

I had to rely on hearsay and my own imagination to depict history. It is an irresponsible interpretation of history itself. It is not unreasonable to say that it is a blasphemy against history.

And the official history is to convince people with reason. to convince people. There are many historians in Chinese history who would rather lose their heads than falsify history according to the will of the rulers.

This is the value of canonical history. Another example is the history of the Twenty-Four History. All of them were written by scholars and experts of this dynasty on the basis of the overthrow of the previous dynasty.

Don't worry about the rulers of the previous dynasty.

Wild history is passed down among the people.

The canonical history is officially revised.

Personally, I think that most of the wild histories are pure, and of course not every part of the official history is very reliable.

Wild History: Unofficial history, you can write the history of any dynasty: it is officially revised, usually a dynasty is the history of the previous dynasty, because the official history is written by the imperial court, so it is to determine the legal status of its own dynasty, but also to maintain its own rule, therefore, the official history is all praise or favor to the ruler.

Because the official history is officially funded, the official history is usually very large, for example, the history of the Ming Dynasty repaired by the Qing Dynasty, it takes several years to read it all, and you can imagine how much content there is.

Wild histories are written by folk people, and they also have subjective characteristics. Therefore, in order to understand the truth of history, it is necessary to combine wild history with official history. For example, there is no content related to the Ming emperor's Muslims in the history of the Ming Dynasty, but the wild history is not, such as the biography of the Ming martyrs, which reveals that the Ming emperor was actually a "Hui" Muslim.

Zhengshi upstairs said all of it, and Yeshi said that she persuaded Hong Chengchou to surrender.

The official history is generally the official historical record, and the wild history contains some folk rumors.

The credibility of wild history is not high, and it is generally not used as a standard for research.

Although it is said that the wild history contains some folk rumors, it does not mean that the wild history lacks credibility. Precisely because the official history is an official historical record, it will inevitably have the color of serving the ruler. 24 History is mostly a tool that ancient emperors appointed historians to revise and add color to themselves.

As a result, the rebels who rebelled against the dynasty were invariably bandits in the history books (although later generations may not see it that way). Therefore, the official history often does not truly reflect the era it narrates, but then again, who can really tell the past about the past

The difference is big The official history was compiled by the historians of the lower dynasties and is official, but this does not mean that other historical materials, including wild history, are useless, which requires historical data to be distinguished, and historians of all dynasties are doing this.

Official history refers to the history recorded in official history books, which is not necessarily a fact, but is official, compiled by the historians of previous dynasties.

Relatively speaking, wild histories are compiled by individuals, and the credibility of historical books that record anecdotes of the ancients is unknown.

The official history is the official record, and the wild history is the folk tradition or some informal records of the people.

It's equivalent to the difference between official and unofficial now.,It's hard to say which is more real.。。。