Can rural local doctors really cure diseases? On what basis?

Can rural local doctors really cure diseases? On what basis? Doctors in rural areas are known as village doctors and were previously known as barefoot doctors.

In the past, most of the agricultural doctors were traditional Chinese medicine practitioners, but now they are mainly Western medicine. Indeed, home remedies cure major diseases, small medicines cure major diseases, and difficult and miscellaneous diseases. There are several folk prescriptions in the hands of village doctors.

In addition, Chinese herbal medicine used to be wild. When we were in school, we also collected Chinese herbs to sell for money. The curative effect is obvious, and the ** effect is good.

Village doctors can cure diseases and have good prescriptions, but now the quality of traditional Chinese medicine is not good, and most of them are planted.

1. It is very inconvenient for rural residents to go to cities and towns for medical treatment for minor illnesses for a long time. Serious illnesses can be partially reimbursed for hospitalization expenses, minor illnesses can only be in outpatient clinics, various examinations are expensive, and there is no NCMS.

Reimbursement eligibility, so people can't afford it. Therefore, people in rural areas who suffer from minor illnesses do not need to spend a lot of money, and actively go to the city to see a doctor, which is mainly a waste of money and time, and the gains outweigh the losses. Therefore, these reasons led to the prevalence of village doctors, which is an inevitable consequence.

2. From an official point of view, village doctors are not medically qualified, which is an illegal act.

However, historically, rural people can only rely on these rural doctors to treat minor diseases, some minor diseases, and even some incurable diseases, which are effective. Farmers have a lot of faith in their medical technology. In short, the current situation of rural medical care determines the existence of rural doctors.

Although they are forbidden to practice medicine illegally, rural residents are very convinced that the disease is not only time-saving, convenient, but also economical. Why not do more with one stone. Of course, no one is looking for quacks in rural areas, so there is no market.

Dr. Tu is a good doctor who can treat diseases, is safe and effective, and has excellent medical skills.

3. It is not clear what a disease is. I can't say that a big hospital is 100% good, and the local doctors in rural areas must be bad. As long as we address our needs, it is good and doable.

In that environment, you should try. Like many ancient famous doctors, Hua Tuo and Li Shizhen.

Sun Simiao and others, aren't they local doctors? Experienced, just as powerful.

Of course they can, because they will have some earthwork, which have been handed down from ancient times. It has been proven from generation to generation.

Rural local doctors may not be able to cure diseases, because they use some earthworks, and they may not have obtained a doctor's license.

Rural doctors can cure diseases, and these doctors have also learned some medical knowledge, mainly to serve the villagers.

There are two types of treatment for the local doctor:

1. Where a folk "local doctor" uses a prescription to treat a disease, and the "circumstances are serious" constitute the crime of illegal medical practice;

2. The use of some prescriptions and home remedies with certain curative effects to occasionally treat the masses without opening a clinic is not a crime or crime.

1. The constitutive elements of an administrative offense are as follows, and these four articles must be present at the same time.

1. The subject of the illegal act must be an administrative subject. The actor's qualifications as an administrative subject are a prerequisite for an administrative violation. Only the acts of administrative subjects may constitute administrative violations, and the acts of non-administrative subjects cannot constitute administrative violations.

2. The perpetrator has relevant legal obligations. Administrative entities enjoy the power of administrative management in accordance with the law, and at the same time must perform the duties and obligations that correspond to each other. The legal obligations of one administrative entity do not necessarily apply to other administrative entities.

Therefore, in order to determine whether the acts of an administrative subject constitute an administrative violation, it is necessary to first determine whether it bears relevant statutory obligations.

3. The perpetrator has not performed a statutory obligation. If the administrative entity has a statutory obligation, then the failure to perform or assume this obligation can constitute an administrative violation. That is to say, there must be an act of an administrative subject, and such an act must be an act that violates the norms of administrative law, infringes on the administrative relationship protected by law, and has a certain degree of social harm.

4. The perpetrator is subjectively at fault. Subjective fault refers to the state of mind held by the actor when he or she performs the act, including intentional and negligent, collectively referred to as "fault".

II. Characteristics of Civil Violations.

1) A civil offense is an act that violates an obligation to act or refrain from acting under the Civil Code;

2) Some civil violations do not require the actor to be subjectively at fault, such as engaging in highly dangerous operations that cause property or personal injury to others, even if the actor is not subjectively at fault, it also constitutes a civil violation;

3) For civil violations committed by persons without civil capacity, although they do not bear civil liability, their guardians shall bear the corresponding civil liability;

4) In some cases, acts that violate national civil policies and the public interest of society can also constitute civil violations.

Legal basis

Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 336:Where a person who has not obtained a doctor's license illegally practices medicine, and the circumstances are serious, is to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release, and/or a fine; where the patient's physical health is seriously harmed, a sentence of between three and ten years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; and where the death of the patient is caused, a sentence of not less than 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine shall be given.