In the near future, a house in the city will not be worth as much as a house in the country, do you

The house of the future is not as valuable as the countryside? Many of these issues are subjective assumptions and are in line with one's own interests. My personal opinion is that in the future, not only will most of the rural population be greatly reduced, but many small cities may disappear!

The population is further concentrated.

The city's education, medical care, public travel and other supporting facilities are not comparable to the countryside, simply say the small things in life, such as online shopping, various express delivery in the city, takeaway can be delivered to the door, is it so convenient in the countryside? Carefully observe the necessities of life, the larger the city, the cheaper the daily chemical products, the more expensive the township, the more people in the middle, the difference in price, and finally all consumers pay.

Life is not just about agricultural and sideline productsThe more backward the place, the higher the cost of living. In the county seat, three or five people can eat enough to fry a few dishes in a small restaurant for 100 yuan, but in a small restaurant in the township, these dishes will never be cheaper than the county seat, so I will taste good. I have observed that all kinds of vegetables in many towns and villages are wholesaled from the county seat!

Secondly, the larger the city, the more populous the city, the more opportunities there are, and many rural and rural households have houses, but they would rather rent a house in the city to work. Let's take our county as an example, even if you don't have any skillsEven if you go to the construction site to move bricks and sand, one person can earn more than 100 a dayBut where do you work in the countryside? I am responsible for getting up early in the morning and working in the fields at night, removing all kinds of pesticides and agricultural materials, and I am responsible for saying that a farmer cannot reach an income of 50 yuan a day!

It is human nature to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, and of course ordinary people also pay labor, what to do quickly when you get money! Who doesn't understand that the air in the countryside is good and suitable for living and pensioning, but most people do not have the conditions and qualifications to retire. Let's not talk about whether ordinary people can afford a top luxury car, we will give you one for free, the condition is that it must be the same as your electric car, you commute to work and buy groceries, and ordinary people can't afford to pay for a year's insurance, fuel and other expenses.

In the same way, without any income, you will be given a house in the center of the city for you to live in, various property management fees, water and electricity bills, and transportation expenses for travel. These are not something that a person with no income can afford. Housing prices in cities are high because ordinary people can earn more money after living in the city!

Some people may think like this, most people are old and want to return to the countryside to live an idyllic life, but have you thought about it, everyone returns to the countryside to retire, but they definitely don't want their children or grandchildren to live in the countryside with them, even if you want to, it is estimated that your children and grandchildren are not willing!

Will the rural house be worth anything in the future, even if the future people want to go back to the countryside. Won't stay long either. After all, life in the city is very different from that in the countryside. I will only want to go back and live with a sense of freshness. There will be more and more nursing homes in the future.

I believe in this because there is less and less land in the countryside, and it will gradually go against urbanization in the future.

I believe in this thing. But in the near future, it is still quite distant, the houses in the city are relatively small, the houses in the countryside are relatively large, and they can be made into small villas.

I don't believe it, after all, the houses in the city and the infrastructure are better than the houses in the countryside, and the ** of a house is still evaluated according to the location.

I believe. Because there are too many high-rise buildings in the city now. Most of the people have already lived in such houses. So it's not worth much.

I don't believe it. As urbanization accelerates, more and more people will buy houses in cities, and urban houses will only be more expensive and more valuable. It is impossible to depreciate.

Yes, in the future, rural houses are likely to become more and more valuable, because there are more and more urban retired workers in the future, and they yearn for rural life, so if a large number of rural settlements are settled, rural houses will also appreciate, generally relying on the houses on both sides of the highway may be demolished because of road construction as compensation, and there is also a large appreciation space for rural houses in the surrounding tourist attractions.

Will a house in the countryside be worth a lot of money in the future?

Now that rural people have settled in the city, many rural houses are idle, I think there are very likely to be big changes in the future, such as people in the city began to settle in the countryside for the elderly, after all, the environment in the countryside, the air is very fresh, so the rural houses will definitely appreciate, and there are some first- and second-tier cities.

In the nearby countryside, these houses will definitely be very valuable, because there are more and more people in the city, especially crowded, and some urban people will be willing to choose the nearby countryside to live after retirement, to do a leisurely rural pension life, farming and planting vegetables is also very leisurely, is the dream of many urban retired workers, if this development is realized, then the rural house will definitely become more and more valuable.

Which houses have more room for appreciation?

If the rural houses want to appreciate more, they must be close to the rural houses in the city, because if they are demolished, the rural areas around the city will receive a large amount of compensation, and there are also some tourist attractions.

The rural house, which is very nostalgic and has the potential to be appreciated, can be visited around tourist attractions and at the same time as a farmhouse.

Let the tourist guests enjoy a different life, and there is also the possibility that the house next to the highway will appreciate in value, because it is possible that the road will be repaired, or even the road will be expanded, then the house needs to be demolished, and it will be compensated, and it will also appreciate.

It can be seen that it is possible to appreciate the value of rural houses in the future, because many urban people are more and more yearning for rural life, and I hope the above can help you.

As for the appreciation of rural houses, I believe that one meeting should be looked at in two places: some areas will appreciate, but there is no market for value (because rural houses cannot be bought and sold freely); Some farmhouses and villages are likely to be phased out and abandoned (many have been or are in the process of being phased out).

First, from the perspective of the law of economic development: survival of the fittest, good development of the place house will increase in value. Otherwise, it may be abandoned and eliminated.

The reality is so cruel that no one can escape the iron law of survival of the fittest. Whether a place develops well or not, whether it develops fast or not, whether it is synchronized with the fast lane of national development, or is eliminated, location conditions, environmental conditions, resource endowments, and development foundation play a decisive role. In the process of implementing rural revitalization, priority to be developed, developed fast and good, must be better in all aspects, development also has a foundation in the place, water to the low, people to go high, some poor conditions of the people and resources will be gradually attracted to the development of the place, only a few people of the village, only a few people of the production community, its withdrawal is not far away, ** has been publicly reported several abandoned villages and abandoned farmhouses.

2. From the perspective of the needs of agricultural and rural development: the value of farmhouses will be improved in villages that have been given key development. The farmhouses in the relocated villages are naturally the objects of elimination and abandonment.

At present, according to the environment in which the village is located, the foundation of development and the current situation, etc., the village is planned to be divided into four categories: agglomeration and upgrading, integration into the town, characteristic protection, relocation and merger, agglomeration and upgrading, integration into the town, and characteristic protection of the village will be able to focus on supporting the development, and its farmhouse will naturally increase in value; Relocation and merger villages will be relocated and merged through relocation, ecological livability relocation, rural agglomeration relocation, etc., and it will be difficult for the rural houses of the relocated villages to escape the fate of being eliminated and abandoned.

At the same time, judging from the published data, agriculture and rural areas should be given priority development, and urbanization will be further promoted, and at least 200 million rural populations will be reduced, so as to create conditions for intensive and large-scale land cultivation. In the process of continuing to promote urbanization, the value of rural housing in small towns and key villages will inevitably be improved. However, as the rural population continues to decrease, hollow villages and elderly villages will continue to appear, and abandoned villages and abandoned farmhouses will continue to occur.

To sum up, in places that are synchronized with the fast track of national development, agglomeration and upgrading, integration into towns, and characteristic protection villages, their farmhouses will increase in value while economic development, but because farmhouses cannot be bought and sold freely, their essence is not of great significance to farmers. However, in villages with poor living conditions, fragile ecological environment, frequent natural disasters and particularly serious population loss, they will gradually be relocated and withdrawn, many farmhouses will be eliminated and abandoned, and some villages will not even exist.

It will be valuable. With the strong support of the state, the pace of rural urbanization is getting faster and faster. Just like today's large and medium-sized cities, many of them were originally developed from small and medium-sized cities.

1. Homesteads in the suburbs There is a lot of room for appreciation in homesteads that are relatively close to the city. With the continuous development of the city, the third and fifth ring roads can no longer meet the carrying capacity of the city. For a city to grow, it must expand its capacity and continue to extend outward.

Therefore, rural homesteads close to cities have the greatest room for appreciation. 2. The reason why the homestead with a special location has a special location is because the specific location is special. The author does not know.

Special locations may only be visible to the discerning person. After the right, the homestead is the fixed property of the peasant, so we have the right to buy and sell the homestead, then we can compare the homestead to a commodity. Commodities are rare and expensive, and so are homesteads.

It's valuable, and there's a lot of room for appreciation.

Whether the homestead located in and around the developed city will appreciate depends on its geographical location. The closer it is to the big cities, the more likely it is to be prioritized, and the homesteads here naturally have a lot of room for appreciation. In most rural areas, there is little chance of appreciation due to the loss of youth and lack of support and purchasing power.

I think that as more and more houses are built in small cities, urbanization gets better and better, and houses will definitely become less and less valuable. This is determined by the relationship between supply and demand, firstly, because the size of the city is not necessarily related to the level of housing prices, secondly, because the houses in small cities with good development will be very popular, and thirdly, because only the houses in cities with poor conditions will be worthless.

The first reason is that there is no correlation between the size of the city and the price of housing. It is a very clear fact that whether a house in a city is worth money or not is closely related to the state of the city. But that doesn't mean that a house in a small city isn't worth much.

There is no correlation between the size of a city and the price of a city. The factor that is really closely related to the ** of the house is the state of development of the city. Only if the city is in good condition can the city house be more valuable.

The second reason is that well-developed houses in small cities will be very popular. Small cities seem to have limited conditions and lack of attractiveness. There are small but well-developed cities that are very popular with small but well-developed cities.

In addition, although the economic development status of some small cities is not too high, the urban environment is very good, the livability is very high, and it is very comfortable to live in such a city, and the houses in this small city will be very popular.

The third reason is that only a house in a city with poor conditions will be worthless. For a city with good conditions, the development is good and the city is vibrant, and the houses in the city will be very popular. However, for those cities with poor conditions and unsatisfactory development status, few people pay attention to the houses in these cities due to various reasons such as limited economic conditions and a decrease in the number of residents.

All in all, this situation does exist in some small towns that are not in a good state of development. Houses in these small cities are indeed going to become less and less valuable.

Will a house in the countryside be worth anything in five years? Can the house be worth it?

I think that the houses in the countryside should be very valuable in the future, because the current rural development is getting better and better.

If the rural area is in a good location, there is room for development in the future, and the house will become valuable.

That's for sure, after all, if they want to develop in the future. It's definitely going to keep expanding outward.

The possibility is very high, after all, many areas are now carrying out development reforms.

Nowadays, the traditional rural houses are getting lower and lower, and there are many of themLack of local flavor of small western-style single-family houses occur in the countryside, this kind of imitation from the city of small western-style single-family houses have a very large part of the long-term no one settled, even if not, then why do this kind of migrant workers go to great lengths to run back to the countryside to build houses, the houses in the city are not fragrant? This situation has to be analyzed from the following aspects. Conflicting commercial interests.

Young people who are buying a house in the city,

Some people are only envious of the excellence, convenience and enjoyment of urban people, and feel that they can get rid of the deep valleys of the countryside and enjoy the material conditions in the city. The other part of them considered buying a house in a big city for my future entrance exams, marriage, and childbirth. But this is only a contingency.

With the implementation of the rural policy, the advantages of the agricultural household registration will gradually and steadily develop and improve in the future, and this part of the people are envious and jealous of the benefits of rural housing, responsible fields, agricultural subsidies, and cope with the pressure of survival in big cities, and feel hopeless and developmental<>

It's true that you can't earn it, and you can go back to the countryside to eat and drink well, and it's not a problem for a family to eat and drink. In addition, the agricultural hukou will be more valuable than the urban hukou in the future. Seeing the prospects and expectations of rural development in the future, I was tempted to return to the countryside.

House is a rigid demand, now in the city there are several houses under the rich household is very common, for them, buy a house, and then wait for the national housing price **, and finally sell or rent to make money, and farmers have money, naturally also want to have more houses, for the villagers, you can choose to live in a big city, but also choose to go back to the countryside to live, more casual. Those who have a house in the city and choose to build their own house in the countryside are <>

Basically, it is for the elderly care service to be considered. Since the confirmation of rural land rights, the rural areasLand is becoming more and more valuable, if you have spare money to build a house at home, and when you are older, you can choose to go back to the countryside to retire, and the countryside has its own rural homestead and agricultural land, you can grow some vegetables and fruits, raise some chickens, ducks and geese, sometimes come out to bask in the sun, breathe in the air of the suburbs, and you can also play chess with the masses, unrestrained. All in all, there is nothing wrong with having a house in the city and choosing to build a house in the countryside, you can use it for living, you can also save your own rural homestead, and it may also increase in value