Is late justice still justice Is late justice still justice?

Late justice is justice.

Jurist Chen Ruihua in "Visible Justice".

from the judicial process.

reflected on "justice delayed". In his view, "delayed justice is injustice not because the substantive conclusion is wrong or caused by substantive injustice, but because the substantive conclusion is delayed and the procedural process is unfair".

"Delayed justice" is also the pursuit of substantive justice, so it does not mean that delayed justice is not needed, but the injustice it causes in terms of procedure is thought-provoking.

Note. As the basic value of the human legal system, justice generally has two manifestations, namely substantive justice and procedural justice.

Substantive justice is mainly embodied in substantive law, implemented in the conclusion of judicial adjudication, and constitutes a kind of substantive moral restriction on judges.

From a static point of view, substantive justice has a clear set of value criteria. The legal principles put forward by criminal law scholars, such as the legalization of crimes, the proportionality of crimes and punishments, and the equal treatment of similar cases, can generally be regarded as the main content of substantive justice.

Justice delayed is not justice, justice delayed is injustice.

One might argue that justice that is delayed is also justice, but that justice is only one step late. In fact, belated justice is not just because the substantive conclusion is wrong or caused by substantive injustice, but because the substantive conclusion is delayed and the procedural process is unfair.

This delay in justice undermines the timeliness of the administration of justice.

First, look at the consequences of slowness.

Generally speaking, the delay in the formation of adjudication conclusions will lead to an arbitrary extension of the case closure cycle, a large amount of evidence related to the case may be lost, and witnesses who know the facts of the case may have blurred or lost their memory, or even die. Even those "public prosecutors" who were directly responsible for handling cases "back then".

They will also be unable to provide some of the necessary clues about the case due to the passage of time. As a result, the truth of the case becomes more and more difficult to ascertain over time, and the chance of an erroneous verdict increases. It can be seen that the sluggishness and inefficiency of the adjudication process may not lead to a fair adjudication conclusion.

Taking a step back, even if a belated decision is still a just conclusion, the parties involved are directly harmed by the belation of such a conclusion.

No.

Justice delayed is injustice. Believe that justice should be time-sensitive.

Because life is finite. Rehabilitated after death, justice at this time means nothing to the deceased. Such justice is not worthy of being called justice, and the dead cannot hear it. At best, it can only be regarded as a consolation to the family of the deceased.

Introduction

First, from the point of view of natural philosophy, the so-called principle of universal justice is customarily taken as a proposition of natural philosophy, that is, all things or all beings arise and return to their place. When all things in the universe are born and die, life and death, it is the first principle (or universal justice) that plays a dominant or dominant role behind the diversity of all things. All things are produced from it and will return to it, according to necessity; For according to the procedure of time, they will be punished and judged for them.

Secondly, from political philosophy.

From this point of view, this principle indicates that the more fully the individual (individual) realizes the universal necessity in his own existence, and the more accurately he adheres to the sphere of existence prescribed by the whole, the more the fate of the individual will be changed by it. And in the discourse of the necessity of the world (the law of justice) and the existence of the individual, implicit is the question of what is crucial to the emerging order of the state: how the real individual treats the norms, laws, and traditional laws of the state of universal validity.

Justice that is delayed is also justice. There may be many reasons for the delay of justice, but justice that is late is also justice, and it is just not absent.

Yes. If everyone thinks that justice that is late is no longer justice, it is forgivable for the past. If he is wrong, he will continue to be wrong, and there is no need to pursue the ultimate truth.

Justice is late, but it will come eventually, so justice that is late is also justice.

Although late, justice is justice.

It's just time to come to the future.

It's just late, it's still justice.

Yes, as long as justice is served, sooner or later.

Wrong.

As the saying goes, justice should not be absent or late, and justice that arrives late is flawed justice, which emphasizes the time-bound nature of due process.

Delayed justice is considered injustice not because the substantive conclusion is wrong or caused by the substantive injustice, but because the substantive conclusion is prematurely produced and the procedural process is unfair. "Delayed justice" is also the pursuit of substantive justice, so it does not mean that delayed justice is not needed, but the injustice it causes in terms of procedure is thought-provoking.

Classification of justice.

According to the criteria of the different fields involved in justice, justice can be divided into institutional justice, formal justice and procedural justice.

Institutional justice refers to the justice of the social system, specifically referring to whether the distribution of social wealth, resources, responsibilities, and obligations is fair and legitimate.

The form of imitation of great justice is the fair and consistent implementation of the legal system, which emphasizes the consistent realization of the legal system regardless of whether the legal system itself conforms to justice.

Procedural justice refers to the specific steps and methods to ensure the realization of institutional justice and formal justice. In the same way that there should be a fair legislative procedure to ensure judicial fairness, there should also be a fair judicial procedure to ensure judicial fairness.

We believe that justice that is delayed is still repentance, and justice is justice sooner rather than later. At the beginning, conscience is to make an unquestionable distinction between right and wrong, good and evil in politics and metallurgy, laws and regulations, social morality and other industries, and spring prudence conscience can give everyone a vision of effective results and hope for future life. The late arrival is delayed due to some elements of pre-salutation.

1. Justice that is late is not justice to the parties; 2. Justice is a socialized term, which is for the public, whether it is late or not, it is justice, and the purpose is to tell you that there is justice in this society; 3. Writers and historians like late justice the most, and looking at the long river of history, the most meaningful thing to write about and discuss is late justice, because at this time, everyone's dramatic attention to events exceeds the attention to justice; Fourth, the late justice that happens to others is justice, but no one wants it to happen to themselves, and they all want it to take effect immediately.

Of course it's justice, but it's late, and it's incomplete. The hurt deepens, the pain is prolonged, and justice is not complete justice if it does not allow these subsequent hurts and pains to rest in peace. There will be another justice in the future that is delayed to compensate for these hurts, pains.

Forget it, some people will never wait.