What is Rawls s theory of justice, what are the principles of justice in Rawls s A Theory of Justice

Updated on society 2024-06-16
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    1. The principle of freedom first.

    1) Everyone has equal rights and rights, and enjoys all equal freedoms under a complete system.

    2) The freedoms enjoyed by each individual are compatible with the freedoms enjoyed by others under the same system, i.e., the right to equal political freedom in this system, provided that the fair value of this right is ensured.

    2. The principle of equality: including two sub-principles.

    Principle of Equal Opportunity: All positions and positions must be open to all under fair and equal opportunity.

    The principle of difference: to maximize the benefits of the most disadvantaged members of society.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    According to Rawls, justice is the primary value of a social system.

    Rawls argues that the phenomenon is that the whole social structure is designed in such a way that some people share in the greater good and deprive others of the basic good, and he does not recognize that the greater good enjoyed by many is more than enough to compensate for the sacrifice of the few, which he considers unjust. What is the basic good? The basic good, in the book, refers to those things that are assumed to be a rational person who needs whatever he wants, and in a broad sense, rights, freedoms, opportunities and powers, income and wealth, and a sense of self-worth.

    They are linked to the basic structure of society and are the good of society. Among them, freedom and power are determined by the main institutional norms. Rawls's discourse on injustice and goodness is related to the basic institutions or structures of society, and in abstract discourse, the design of social institutions becomes the framework within which the principles of justice come into play.

    Under a certain socio-political and economic situation, the improper distribution of social benefits and burdens determined by it is considered to be the essential characteristic of injustice, and the emergence of these injustices is the indulgence and connivance of natural, social and historical contingent factors. John Rawls, an American political philosopher, ethicist, Ph.D. from Princeton University, and professor at Harvard University, was born on February 21, 1921 and graduated from Princeton University. He is the author of The Theory of Justice, Political Liberalism, Justice as Fairness

    He is one of the most famous political philosophers in the English-speaking world in the 20th century. John Bordley (February 21, 2002 November 24) was an American political philosopher and ethicist. Ph.D. from Princeton University and professor at Harvard University, author of A Theory of Justice (1971), Political Liberalism, Justice as Equity:

    He is one of the most famous political philosophers in the English-speaking world in the 20th century.

    One of the main representatives of the Western New Natural Law School in the 70s of the 20th century, and one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th century. Many of his students now go on to become important figures in moral and political philosophy, such as Thomas Nagel and Joshua Cohen.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The core of Rohr's concept of justice is that "freedom takes precedence over equality, and justice takes precedence over efficiency."

    John Bordley Rawls regards justice as the fundamental criterion for measuring social systems, and the theoretical basis of his theory of justice is the new contract theory. On the basis of resolutely upholding the right to individual liberty and equality of opportunity, Rawls adopted the "principle of difference" to limit social inequality as much as possible and improve the situation of the most disadvantaged in society. At the heart of Rawls's view of justice is that "freedom takes precedence over equality, and justice takes precedence over efficiency."

    Rawls, however, does not advocate equality for all, but for the limits of inequality, which must be applied under two conditions, one is fair equality of opportunity, and the other is in the best interests of the fewest beneficiaries.

Related questions
34 answers2024-06-16

There is a problem in the question, the logic is confused, power and justice are two completely independent things of different nature, but there is a connection between them, so the question should be that justice is always in the hands of the powerful side? Of course not! How can two completely different things always appear at the same time? >>>More

9 answers2024-06-16

Food and clothing are sufficient to know honor and disgrace, and Cang Liao is practical and reasonable.

18 answers2024-06-16

The Buddhas and Bodhisattvas educate and save sentient beings, and they should be enlightened by the causes and conditions of sentient beings. If necessary, he will also use thunder means, King Kong to subdue demons. This is also a form of compassion that prevents sentient beings from creating negative karma and suffering in the future. >>>More

5 answers2024-06-16

1.There are all kinds of good things in the world, and there are a lot of good and obedient words, but it is rare to ask for a true word. - Qing) Shen Juyun 2 >>>More

2 answers2024-06-16

I'm more familiar with this aspect of DC. Marvel's temporary unsolved. DC's side searched for an up master named Barry Allen before station B.,He has DC's animated movie collection in it.,It's very complete.。 <> >>>More