Is power justice justice in the interests of the strong?

Updated on society 2024-05-27
34 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    There is a problem in the question, the logic is confused, power and justice are two completely independent things of different nature, but there is a connection between them, so the question should be that justice is always in the hands of the powerful side? Of course not! How can two completely different things always appear at the same time?

    Powerful people or groups can interpret justice and make laws", and yes, they can even say that they are defending what is called "justice". But is the "justice" they mean in our question? No!

    They just stole the word "justice" and changed the pillars. In fact, you have unconsciously judged that this kind of behavior itself is not righteous, so you will unconsciously ask, "Is this justice?"

    If you have power, you can control everything? ”。

    In the United States today, although the elites who control the country's wealth can influence and make laws, it cannot be said that their actions are completely just. There are still people who openly doubt and criticize this in the free society of the United States, but how can there be perfect justice in the world? Therefore, from a global perspective, the United States** at least the justice of the people at home is second to none, which is beyond the reach of the world.

    As long as justice exists in the hearts of Americans, they can continue to progress, which is unthinkable in the eyes of Chinese.

    People can only survive by living in groups. There is one for every group, big or small"Wang".A person who is convinced by everyone.

    When the individuals in it collide with friction, it is determined by this"Wang"to reconcile from it. The so-called greater the ability. With great responsibility.

    This"Wang"Reconcile the angle of things, the degree of impartiality. And the final result for the individual is"Wang"Responsibilities that must be borne by the burden. So I said:

    Justice produces power. Strength upholds justice. Only people and things can be selfless and fair.

    Those who convince their individual will be empowered to do so"Wang"Bit. So"Wang"must shoulder the responsibility of justice to uphold the principle of fairness and fairness in the community.

    What I said"groups","King"If expanded to one country, one **. So can it explain the landlord's suspicions?

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    People can only survive by living in groups. There is one for every group, big or small"Wang".A person who is convinced by everyone.

    When the individuals in it collide with friction, it is determined by this"Wang"to reconcile from it. The so-called greater the ability. With great responsibility.

    This"Wang"Reconcile the angle of things, the degree of impartiality. And the final result for the individual is"Wang"Responsibilities that must be borne by the burden. So I said:

    Justice produces power. Strength upholds justice. Only people and things can be selfless and fair.

    Those who convince their individual will be empowered to do so"Wang"Bit. So"Wang"must shoulder the responsibility of justice to uphold the principle of fairness and fairness in the community.

    What I said"groups","King"If expanded to one country, one **. So can it explain the landlord's suspicions?

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    What kind of power are you talking about??

    Strong body, strong will or what?

    If in our country, I think that justice is something that is in the interests of the vast majority of people.

    Justice is different for everyone.

    I often read books that say What is Justice?

    It's just that everybody's moral standards are different.

    Of course, when you're strong enough to ignore anything.

    Then what you say is right, and what you think is right is righteousness, which may be something that only God can do.

    Don't think about this inconclusive thing from ancient times to the present, just like the meaning of human existence.

    Having said that, I think it's okay for me not to do things that make me feel guilty.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Power is not necessarily justice, but without power it must not be justice.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Quite simply, absolute power represents absolute justice, but there is no absoluteness in the human world, only relative. The power is extremely righteous and not always right.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    That's right! Power is justice, there is no victory without strength, there is no justice without victory!

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Upstairs, Pan Pan Zhu won't look back when he leaves.

    Please do not tarnish the word justice.

    According to you guys. Not worthy of that word.

    Justice does not need any explanation.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The ultimate victory is, the king is defeated, and the person who wins in the end can interpret justice.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Power and justice are not to be confused.

    There is a distinction between justice and injustice.

    There is no other explanation for justice.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    I use *** in the phrase: "policy out of the barrel of a gun" - unfortunately, yes.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    There is no absolute good, and there is no absolute evil. are all suitable for a certain era of interpretation. You just need to understand what justice is in society at this stage.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Forces are divided into justice and injustice. Real life is already clearly pulling.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    It is equivalent to strength to determine the right to speak.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Theoretically, I don't understand.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Is it just for the United States to fight Iraq?

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    "Justice is the interest of the strong", this is the classic philosophical proposition of the Greek sage Slasmachu.

    It also represents the academic views of the Greek Sophists. In Plato's Republic, there is an elaboration and debate on this issue.

    Later Hobbes inherited and developed this proposition. This is also reflected in related writings. The revival of humanism also influenced a large number of Enlightenment thinkers. For example, Machiavelli's "The Monarch" also embodies this idea.

    The question of justice is a subject of eternal discussion in the legal profession. At present, the most influential is probably Rawls's "A Theory of Justice". The book uses a lot of ideas and speculative analysis, and if you grasp it to that extent, it is quite good, hehe.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Justice should be the victory of the weak and get the benefits they deserve.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Because the strong can control everything.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Literally, it can be understood as: the correct meaning of the existence of things.

    Justice in a narrow sense refers to the prevention, correction or even destruction of the thoughts, behaviors and factors that are and will have a negative impact on the vast majority of people in order to ensure the legitimate interests and development of the vast majority of people in a limited range of moral, historical and cultural backgrounds.

    Justice in a broad sense refers to the prevention and correction of the movements and formation factors that are and will have a negative impact on anything in the shortest possible time in order to ensure the essential meaning of existence and the discreteness and structure of any thing without exclusion (harmony) in the moral and historical and cultural background of a wide range of time and space.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Righteous things are to be judged by the world, throughout the ages, many heroes and heroes think that they are righteous, but only those that are truly in line with the trend of social development, can be supported by the general public, and can endure can be called justice.

    For example, the large-scale development of the western region is a just thing, and the series of activities that have been derived from the large-scale development of the western region to promote the development of the national economy are also more or less just.

    For example, Wenchuan is ruthless, but after Wenchuan, the active participation and broad support of the people across the country, the enthusiastic participation of college student volunteers, and the touching feelings of the People's Liberation Army serving the people, these things are all just.

    Let's talk about Japan, we all say that Japan's aggression against China in World War II was unjust, which is also what we have been denouncing, but in Japan at that time, we all thought that it was just and for the benefit of the general public, because what they saw was the land, wealth, official position, food, etc. brought by the war, and today, in the huge Japanese level, we China out of humanitarian aid, which is also just, whether it is sending rescue teams or supporting relief materials, It is also the heavy vehicles of Sany Heavy Industry, and these are all kinds of assistance that we in China are willing to be friendly with the Japanese people from the bottom of our hearts.

    Similarly, precisely because China is a peace-loving nation that does not like war, the Chinese will not impose war on other countries, because no matter when or what era, it is unjust. In the same way, because our own country is a country with a large area, a large population, and rich land, we should think about how to make greater contributions to our motherland in our limited energy, which is the right thing.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    In a broad sense, justice is to have good thoughts and not to do things that are harmful to others, and in a narrow sense, justice is to have a strong sense of justice, to have opinions on some bad things or behaviors, and to actively express one's own opinions or work to stop them, and to have love and a sense of responsibility.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Justice is something that everyone wants to have, but not many people actually do, and China pursues a harmonious society.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Justice is something that is used to fool people. What is used to enslave people from evil thoughts is also used to make you righteous indignant.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Justice is not buddy righteousness, I personally think that the justice of this society is that you dare to tell the truth! There are too many fake things in this society, and to speak the truth is the righteous side!

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Justice knows no size, no boundaries. Sometimes, in fact, the inconspicuous gesture can also show the righteous side of human nature

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Personally, I think that not doing bad things is justice. For those who do good deeds are not necessarily righteous either.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    Literally, it can be understood as: the correct meaning of the existence of things.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Justice, conscience, but peace of mind.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Try to do what you think is right.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    Justice means not doing bad things yourself, and you can also supervise others not to do bad things.

  31. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Nice words, sonorous slogans.

  32. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    Justice is nosy! ~~

  33. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    Justice is to live well, and to live well is justice.

  34. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    Justice is violence possible.

Related questions
11 answers2024-05-27

It is difficult to define justice and injustice. The Assad regime is a minority of Shiites ruling the majority of Sunnis, which will naturally lead to a conspiracy by the traditional Sunni countries in the Gulf, while neighboring Turkey will restore the glory of the Ottoman Empire and encroach on Syrian land. At the same time, Syria's population is growing too fast, employment is severely underemployed, and the oil-based economy is sluggish. >>>More

17 answers2024-05-27

There is no absolute justice in the world, and justice will change according to different values. >>>More

14 answers2024-05-27

For the sake of the interests of its own country, in fact, some of China's actions are also for its own country, and there is nothing just or unjust.

29 answers2024-05-27

This argument is unscientific, and there is no scientific basis to prove that a Buddha can cause bad luck. >>>More

42 answers2024-05-27

Defending one's homeland Defeating the invaders has the greatest sense of justice.