The first case of gambling stones in China, 80 million rough stones were gambled, what do you think

The risk of gambling on stones is really too big, you may get rich all of a sudden, or you may gamble all of a sudden, this risk is really big, and you can't gamble if you can't bear it.

Personally, I think that as long as it is a gambling component, there will definitely be risks, and this degree of risk is very large.

In my opinion, the failure rate of gambling stones is high. Because this really depends on luck, even people who are more familiar with gambling stones will still lose.

Invest with caution. Because gambling stones are originally three points of eyesight and seven points of luck, so this kind of transaction is a willingness to buy, a willingness to sell, how can there be a profit in the world.

On April 20 this year, the "first case of gambling stones in China" finally came into existenceLatest developments.

China's first gambling stone case" was officially announced in the people's court of Bazhou City, after three days of trial, at 6 pm on April 22, the court announced the "first case of China's gambling stone" to be sentenced at a later date.

This "first gambling stone case in China" mainly revolves around the fictitious gambling venues of the three defendants to the parties, and whether the transaction behavior of the three constitutes a crime of fraud.

As one of the defendants, Zhang Youxing and his family came to the court scene, and the defendant's family reflected to the reporter in an interview with reporters: For many people to say that the gambling stone industry is not a fraud, gambling on stones in the hometown is a tradition, has a long history, if the fraud in the gambling stone case is recognized by the court as fraud, the future of this industry does not know how to operate, I believe that the court will have a fair judgment on this case.

Defendant Zhang Yousheng's defense lawyer defended Zhang Yousheng's innocence.

The plaintiff insisted that the three defendants' gambling and stone trading constituted fraud.

The source of "China's first gambling stone case".

The source was in April 2019, Zhang Youxing, as a jade merchant in Yunnan, sold a piece of jadeite rough worth 80 million yuan to a well-known entrepreneur Ma Mou with the facilitation of two middlemen, but after Ma obtained the jadeite rough, he found that the ** of this jadeite rough was far less than expected. Later, Ma traded with the three again on the grounds that he was willing to pay for high-end goods, but after the second rough stone was delivered to Ma, it was detained, and Ma asked the three to return the payment for the first jade rough.

Ma insisted that Zhang Youxing and the other three people's fictitious jadeite rough stone was illegal fraud, and after negotiating with the three to no avail, Ma chose to call the police to deal with the matter.

At the end of 2019, three people in Zhang Youxing were criminally detained.

In this regard, the People's Procuratorate of Bazhou City held that Zhang Yousheng and the three people illegally defrauded others of their property in the name of gambling stones, and the amount involved was huge, which was sufficient to constitute criminal responsibility, and the three people would be investigated for criminal responsibility on the grounds of fraud.

The defendant, Zhang Yousheng, insisted that the case did not constitute fraud, but mainly because of a dispute arising from gambling stones. The main contradiction is that the customer Ma does not have a full understanding of the culture of gambling stones, gambling stones have a long history in China, but at present, the state has no relevant laws and policies for eating alone, in this case, the tradition of gambling stones should be respected.

On April 22, the first instance of the "first case of gambling stones in China" was announced: the verdict was announced at a later date. What will happen in the future?

China's first gambling stone case" - false origin fraud.

In this case, the lawyer believes that it is fraud, and Professor Zhang Mingkai of Tsinghua University mentions a concept in his book as "the theory of failure of purpose".

Yi Shenghua, the victim's lawyer, said in a statement: "As long as the victim can guarantee that the stone is wood, I will ask for it, and if not, I will not buy it; The three defendants insisted that the original stone was guaranteed to be from the mouth of the wood. At the same time, Zhang Mou Province and Zhang Moulin also pretended to be Burmese (the real household registration place is Yunnan), claiming that the rough stone involved in the case was excavated by himself at the mouth of Munachang, Myanmar.

It can be seen that the victim had a request for the origin of the purchased stone. If the defendant does not know the place of origin, it can be said that he does not know (the situation of multiple transfers), and he cannot say that the unclear situation or the stone that is not Burmese is a Burmese Munachangkou. The defendants in this case, Zhang and Zhang, pretended to be Myanmar and made false statements to deceive the victim into obtaining transactions.

Liu Hongming, the defendant's lawyer in the news, mentioned: "There is no conclusive evidence of the origin of the original stone, and I insist on a not-guilty defense." The author believes that from this interview, it can be seen that the ideas are:

If the origin of the stone cannot be determined to be "Guatemalan", it means that it may be from Myanmar, which means that the evidence for the prosecution of the alleged fraud by the prosecutor's office is flawed, and it is difficult to establish a conviction for fraud. However, lawyer Yi Shenghua mentioned in his statement: "Three authoritative institutions have tested the rough stone and have all reached a consistent conclusion

The origin of the rough in question is Guatemala. From this point of view, the defendant's lawyer, Liu Hongming, said that it is difficult to establish the origin of the rough stone without conclusive evidence, and more powerful evidence is needed to support his opinion.

In addition, after the victim paid a huge amount of money, the defendant quickly transferred most of the money abroad through the underground bank, which has to make people suspicious ......

The following quotation is Zhang Mingkai, Criminal Law, Fifth Edition, Chapter 22, Section 4, "Fraud and Extortion", p. 1005.

Although the perpetrator has provided the most comparable goods, but when he will not pay the money after being informed of the truth, he deliberately makes a false statement about the effectiveness of the goods, etc., so that the other party mistakenly believes in the effectiveness of the goods, and accepts the money delivered by the other party, which constitutes the crime of fraud. In other words, even if the perpetrator provides a considerable amount of payment, but the purpose of the exchange of the deceived person is basically not realized (including the payment of items lacking the important attributes agreed upon by both parties), it should be found to be the crime of fraud (failure of purpose theory).

The Bazhou City People's Procuratorate believes that Zhang Youxing, Zhang Xiaolin, and Tao Dejun, together with others, fabricated facts, concealed the truth, and defrauded others of their property for the purpose of illegal possession, and the amount was particularly huge, and should be investigated for criminal responsibility for the crime of fraud.

The focus of the trial: whether the origin of the gambling stone is fictitious, and whether the transaction constitutes the crime of fraud, in Liu Hongming's view, this is a dispute arising from the gambling stone, which can be resolved through mediation by the gambling stone association or through civil means. Liu Hongming said that the other party may not have a full understanding of the gambling stone culture in Yunnan and Guangdong, and the gambling stone has a long history and is a tradition, and in the absence of relevant laws and policies in China, we should respect the trading habits.

Pay attention to whether the industry norms formed by the gambling stone industry are recognized by the law, and whether such transactions are regarded as fraud. If the law rejects the tradition of gambling stones, then the entire industry is likely to have serious problems.

I would like to know whether this case has been carried out to constitute a crime. Or in a fictitious venue. Gambling stone has a long history, is a tradition, in the current China does not have relevant laws and policies, should respect the trading habits.

Guatemala is expected to be when the Myanmar jadeite rough is not a gambling stone tradition, it has only appeared in recent years**, this case is undoubtedly fraudulent, is it the gambling stone that must be cut?

Gambling stone is the "gambling jade culture" developed by practitioners after the reform and opening up, which fights with the traditional virtue culture of the Chinese nation, violates the "promotion of the traditional culture of the Chinese nation" advocated by the country today, and mainly violates the inheritance of virtue culture. Use the "reason" of relying on vision and "luck" in the "gambling stone culture" to play the edge ball of the law. It is a fraud and illegal act for practitioners to use fake jade, shoddy, indiscriminate filling of ores, and other stones with inclusions (foreskins) to pass off jadeite and Hetian jade.

Many people consider themselves unlucky after being misled by the industry and even "brick families". This kind of gambling is also under the banner of "culture" and is confidently spread and promoted in life and on the Internet. Do you think this "culture" and business are legitimate?

Legal.

The so-called gambling stone, in fact, is a normal rough stone transaction, betting on your eyesight and luck.

Gambling on stones is knowledge and eyesight, and it is also called gambling and gambling is legal in China.

The link to the web page can be followed at any time as it is updated.

Summary. Gambling stone is a kind of investment behavior, this gambling refers to this kind of investment is extremely risky, even professionals do not have a reliable grasp, not a gambling gamble, of course, not illegal.

Is "gambling stone" legal in China.

Gambling stone is a kind of investment behavior, this gamble, refers to this kind of investment is extremely risky, even professionals do not have a reliable burial Zheng grasp, not a gambling gamble, when the hail does not commit the bend of the law.

Can gambling stones be reversed if they lose?

No, because gambling is allowed by law, your side is voluntary, and there is no way to recover the loss if you lose.

Can I report the crime?

This is allowed by law, if you voluntarily participate and you need to bear the loss, it is useless to call the police.

It is recommended that you stay away from all gambling behaviors in the future, maintain an optimistic attitude, be positive, and wish you a happy life.

It is to buy a stone, cut it to see if there is any jade in it, if there is, it may be possible to make dozens of times the profit after gambling once.

It's similar to gambling, one knife is poor and one knife is rich, a lot of tongues are put together, and there are stones that may have jadeite gems in them.

Gambling stone is that there are many merchants who sell jade to buy some stones, and the buyers select the stones to the high ** through their own experience and vision, and then the seller opens the stone to see if there are gems inside.

This is an act based on one's own knowledge and luck, generally to guess whether the stone is specific and valuable, if it succeeds, it will turn over directly, and if it fails, it will be ruined.

Gambling stone is a term in the jewelry industry, which is a way of trading jadeite rough stones, which is popular in the border area of Yunnan and Myanmar, with a gambling nature. When the jadeite is mined, it is wrapped in a layer of weathered skin, and it is impossible to know the quality of the jadeite, and the quality of the jadeite can only be known after cutting.