Urgently need a debate material on whether adventure is a blessing or a curse!

Adventure is a kind of transcendence of oneself; It is an exploration of nature; It is a kind of hard work and enterprising; It is also a manifestation of the value of life.

We explore the wonders of "the desert is lonely and the sun sets over the long river"; We pursue the infinite charm of nature; We discover the mysteries of the vastness of space. At all times, people try to transcend these horizons, and our actions are precisely – expeditions.

People all over the world are praising the great navigators Columbus and Magellan; are all praising the heroic messenger Zheng He; are all praising the brave adventurer Robinson, and they are praising the great Xu Xiake and Wang Yusheng. And the career they pursue in their life is adventure. If exploration is not a beneficial activity, is it a manifestation of human ignorance?

It is precisely because of human exploration that we are in the icy and snowy Antarctic; in the arid and hot Sahara; in the mysterious and deep Amazon; in the vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean; In ......Only then did we have the footprints of human beings, and only then did we have today's world.

If you don't ......

We still have to live in caves, wear bark, and live like other animals.

Personally, I believe that curiosity should be maintained is a consensus that can be reached on both sides of the debate, and in the process of argumentation, the important role of curiosity and related examples can be clarified, and of course, it is necessary to distinguish between positive and negative curiosity, and define curiosity in favor of oneself in the process of defining curiosity. In my opinion, the point of confrontation in the debate should be on the frequency word "often". What is constant and what is the concept?

It can also be reminded that, as in the example mentioned upstairs, curiosity may only play an important role in the beginning, and in Marie Curie's later work, it can also be said that faith supports her work and exploration, and here, faith is not curiosity, preventing the concept from being stolen.

As for the material, you can find an encyclopedia to find it, such as Marie Curie's example (Newton's example is the most suitable for you, you can keep it in your life and give up to keep it curious).

To cite a counter-case, it is necessary to clearly adhere to the central argument that "risk-taking" and "adventure" are not the same concept, and insist on emphasizing to the other side that "risk-taking" is a rash and unconstrained move without knowing the reality of the situation and without considering one's own strength, so "risk-taking" will inevitably lead to failure. We can cite the examples of the fifth anti-encirclement and suppression of Li De and Bogu's military adventure to attack Guangchang and the heavy losses, as well as the case of Qin Wugong's violent death of Zhou Ding, the case of the Japanese army in the Battle of Midway Island rashly attacking under the condition of blindness and deafness and losing more than half of the aircraft carriers, and the case of Ma Tan losing the street pavilion.

Positive: 1, grasp the experience of adventure to people, 2, make people become self-confident 3, understand life 4, exercise people's ability to survive independently.

Opposite: 1, prone to accidents, causing irreparable damage to people 2, while the exploration is popular, for some pollution-free areas, it also leaves human footprints, which is not conducive to environmental protection, 3. Some underage children blindly explore without organization.