Sincere access to a legal expert is too tricky!!

You are legally responsible for the child, but not for your girlfriend. There is a legal obligation to support the child.

The law does not interfere with your sexuality, but the child is an independent social individual, and once born, as the father, you have a legal responsibility for his upbringing.

You emphasize that you are a civil servant, but you want to know if this will have an impact on your career, which I despise!!

Anyone who violates the "Population and Family Planning Law" shall pay social maintenance fees in accordance with the law and shall also be given administrative sanctions in accordance with the law.

I won't give you any advice, and at the same time, I despise your irresponsible attitude, and your girlfriend is really blind.

In these days, civil servants seem to be irresponsible civil servants! If such a thing is revealed, will you, as a civil servant, still have a political future?

When a child is born, it is necessary to talk about responsibility, of course, it is the responsibility of raising the child, and everything else is secondary. This is a question that even if you only think with your lower body, you know.

1. Try to recall it.

2. If he said that he underpaid 10,000 yuan, what is his evidence? I also said I paid 10,000 more?

3. Find the transaction records of the day when you paid the money, such as the transaction records of the day of the bank passbook, or the recent transaction records. Because the amount is relatively large.

4. Find out if your own friends and relatives were present when you made the payment, and remember together.

There should be a surveillance video in the S store, check the video at that time to see if it can provide clues. But you can't watch this video, because it's in their hands, and if they want to falsely accuse you, they won't let you. However, the video is just a clue.

6. Since he wants to call the police, then you just tell the police the truth.

7. If there is no evidence, what can't you do? Why didn't they point out that there were 10,000 less? Or did they not find out themselves at the end of the month?

It's ten thousand, not a dollar, what does their accountant do? It's been almost a year, and I'm still looking for you.

8. To prove that I underpaid 10,000 yuan, he must at least come up with evidence.

10. As for where the invoice is, you can go to their car dealership in the way of strangers to consult, such as **. Say you want to have a high-end car, but you are a little short of money, what is the mortgage process? If you go out like this, where is the invoice?

Or look for your mortgage contract, which is usually written on the contract. Or ask the bank.

From a civil law perspective, it belongs to aiding and abetting torts.

In China, telecommunications operators take very small numbers of photographs, and the counterparts who use telecommunications services know or should know that the account providers they purchase on the network are illegal business entities.

Buying an account with an illegal operator at a low price is actually an act of aiding the infringement. It is illegal, but because such illegal acts are not for profit, they are generally minor violations and will not be subject to substantive punishment and prosecution.

According to the jurisprudence of the crime of theft, the theft of stolen goods is also the crime of theft, and in the same way, it is also illegal to take advantage of the software loopholes of illegal operators to obtain improper benefits. However, if such unjust enrichment is not for profit, it is only a minor offense. There will be no substantive penalties.

The situation you mentioned is often encountered on the Internet, and it is definitely illegal from a legal point of view. In fact, it is often the "consumer" himself who suffers in the end.

1. Using this ** to buy an account, whether it is illegal or not, objectively speaking, it is illegal, because it was obtained by someone else. If you don't know how to top up and buy it, you can only be exempted from liability.

**The original transaction records can be used as evidence.

In addition, with a significantly lower than the average ** purchase, as an ordinary person, the court can also presume that you should know, and pursue responsibility.

Core problem: It is illegal to just buy, if the amount is small, no one will be held accountable, and if the amount is very large, someone may be held accountable.

Resale is also illegal, but with less liability than the original manufacturer.

2. Broadly speaking, it is also illegal for you to call the free **. But it's certainly not stealing, and it's not enough to be convicted. Because if he doesn't have a fixed method of operation that you need to follow, and it's his own design flaw.

The likelihood of constituting a crime is very small, but it can constitute unjust enrichment.

Core issue: Broadly speaking, it is illegal to benefit oneself without a legitimate reason to harm the interests of others, because there is an unjust enrichment system that can require you to return it. It can also be said that the illegality is not strong.

The more obvious violation is that the software stipulates certain operating procedures, and you deliberately violate the rules and procedures, deliberately looking for loopholes to make a profit.

3. Under normal circumstances, the operator should not record the call, because it violates personal privacy. If it is disseminated, it is even more illegal and violated.

However, if it is used as evidence, even if it is illegally obtained evidence, whether the validity of the evidence can be determined in practice, the exclusion objects of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in China's law are not very wide, and some recognize and some do not.

Illegal! Greedy for small profits! Destroy yourself!

Break the law, go ask someone! It's absolutely illegal, and it's not right to play online games in the first place.

The Internet is a virtual platform, true and false, false and true, there is no free lunch in the world. It's better not to enjoy that bit of insecurity.

1 You know that you don't know how to recharge that account has nothing to do with whether you are breaking the law or not, but if you know that you are stealing someone else's account to play **, you buy and use it, then it is an illegal and criminal act, because China's criminal law has clear provisions in this regard, of course, you may not use it to that extent, but it is better to be careful.

2 It should be an act of theft, and unjust enrichment is in civil law, but theft is in criminal law, and the consequences in criminal law are much more serious. If the circumstances are serious, you can go to prison again.

Although you sent me a message, from your question, I still can't be sure of the complete operation of the practice, so I don't dare to jump to conclusions. But in principle, I personally tend to think:

1. To judge whether it is illegal, in the simplest terms, it should be judged from whether you know that you are harming the legitimate interests of others. If it is damaged, it is naturally illegal.

2. Because the practical operation is not very clear, therefore, I can't judge whether it is possible to determine who is using the software and benefiting from it through technical means, if not, then in terms of individual cases, the cost of law enforcement is too high, you want to ......Just hehe......

3. Personally, I tend to think that it is unlikely to be recorded, otherwise the operating costs of this operator will be too high. As for other means of exploiting software vulnerabilities, it is entirely possible to claim that they are misoperated, unless the license for the use of the software has clear requirements for operation.

4. As for the law, alas, the problems are too complicated, the laws are too complicated, and the recent affairs are too complicated.

The crime of negligence causing death is constituted, and the analysis is as follows:

In the composition of crimes, harmful acts are very important factors, which can be divided into two forms: acts and omissions (some believe that possession should also be included), where omission refers to the obligation of criminal law to require the perpetrator to perform a specific positive act, and the perpetrator is able to perform but does not fulfill the obligation, in short, "should be able to do but not do". Specific obligations in the omission, ** in the following areas:

1. Explicit provisions in law.

2. Obligations required by the position and business.

3. Obligations arising from previous acts.

4. Obligations arising from legal acts.

5. Obligations required by public order and social morality.

In this case, the woman committed suicide by taking pesticides, and the man did not have the obligation to rescue the woman, either legally, in his position or in business, or on the basis of his previous acts or legal acts. However, since the two were in a romantic relationship, the woman's suicide had a certain relationship with the man, so from the perspective of public order and social morality, the man had the obligation to protect the woman's life and eliminate the danger, and he should rescue the woman in a reasonable manner. When the woman drank the pesticide and foamed at the mouth, the man instead of rescuing her, slammed the door and locked it, which was subjectively negligent and constituted a crime.

First of all, we want to condemn the indifference of the male protagonist in the case.

According to the provisions of China's criminal law, the objective act of the crime of intentional homicide or intentional injury shall be an act. Only the omission of a person under a legal obligation can constitute the crime of intentional homicide or intentional injury.

Because the hero in the case has no statutory mandatory obligations to his girlfriend, such as rescue. His girlfriend is a person with full capacity for civil conduct, so the male protagonist in the story does not need to bear criminal responsibility for leaving his suicide girlfriend. But to receive moral condemnation.

The above is only a personal opinion, and the specific judicial practice also requires the undertaking judge to convict and sentence in accordance with the law.

Any objections are welcome**.

does not constitute a crime. The husband does not have any legal obligation to help, only a moral duty to help.

This is one of the past questions, and the answer is the same as that year. I agree with that.

Moreover, the man's conduct does not fall under the obligation of omission under the criminal law**.