Ask a legal expert to help you look at it5, and ask a legal expert to help you take a look

In any of the following circumstances, it shall be deemed to be a work-related injury: 1. Injured in an accident due to work-related reasons during working hours and in the workplace; 2. Injured in an accident while engaged in work-related preparatory or finishing work in the workplace before or after working hours; 3. Injured by violence or other accidents during working hours and in the workplace due to the performance of work duties; 4. Suffering from occupational diseases; 5. During the period of going out for work, the person is injured due to work reasons or the whereabouts of the accident are unknown; 6. Injured in a motor vehicle accident while commuting to or from work; 7. Other circumstances that shall be recognized as work-related injuries as provided by laws and administrative regulations. In any of the following circumstances, it shall be regarded as a work-related injury:

1. Died of sudden illness during working hours and at work, or died within 48 hours after rescue efforts failed; 2. Suffering harm in emergency rescue and disaster relief and other activities to safeguard national interests or public interests; 3. Employees who originally served in the army, were disabled due to war or duty injuries, and have obtained the certificate of revolutionary disabled soldiers, and were injured after arriving at the employer.

You can take a look at the above regulations in detail, I think it should be seen, your friends can only wait for the owner of the car to find him to ask for compensation. And the unit is not compensated!

From a neutral point of view, it may constitute a work-related injury, and the dispute is whether it is on the way to work.

First of all, going to work in five minutes is still not going to work, rather than leaving halfway through work to do personal business. Secondly, it is legal for the two to use their own time to buy mobile phones. In the end, the two did drive to work.

As an employer, the only argument you can make to commute to and from work refers to a reasonable route for an employee to travel between his or her place of work and his place of residence within a reasonable time. You must prove that their route is not a reasonable route between your workplace and your place of residence.

This is not a work-related injury. You can file a lawsuit in court as a personal injury compensation dispute.

Forehead. Let's analyze first: W represents Wan, W was ordered to correct illegal mining, but he refused to change after repeated teachings, so he upgraded the punishment measures and made a "decision to order to stop illegal mining and dismantle the small coal kiln", and took action in time.

First of all, I have to say that there is nothing wrong with this physically;

However, as mentioned in your article, no written decision has been made - if this is true as you said, then it is indeed procedurally wrong, no matter what kind of administrative punishment, there should be a relevant legal document, and the document should be served on the parties, inform the parties of the remedy for dissatisfaction with the administrative penalty, and indicate the specific name (address) of the reconsideration organ and the litigation court, the time limit for reconsideration and litigation, indicate the date of production and affix the official seal of the administrative law enforcement agency, so that the parties have a way to remedy.

So according to what you said, he does have a problem with this penalty decision. However, I would like to tell you a word: if you have no rights and interests to claim in substance, but only have procedural problems, then, at present, the court generally does not revoke the administrative compulsory act or finds it illegal, but completes the relevant formalities and determines that it is a legal and valid act.

In your case, based on the information you provided, I personally believe that there are no physical interests affected. Therefore, I do not recommend that you file a lawsuit or reconsider.

Overexploitation is punishable, I think it's legal, it's legal, it's confined.

You should go to the traffic police to report the case, and the traffic police are also the management department, so it is also convenient to distinguish the sharing of responsibilities.

The child suddenly rushed out of the roadside, and the parent, as the guardian, was partly responsible. As for the main responsibility and secondary responsibility, it is also necessary for the traffic police to analyze and judge.

In addition to the responsibility of the parents, the rest is borne by the boss and you, because it is a duty act during working hours, the employer (boss) is responsible first, and you are responsible for part of the "rest" according to the negligence (if there is no negligence, you are not responsible).

Be quick to deal with traffic alerts, and the sooner you are, the more proactive.

In fact, this matter is not serious, so there is no need to worry.

1。I don't know how badly you hurt your child. You are right to treat the child and take it to the hospital in the first place, and you don't need to call the police. There is no need to report to the traffic police afterwards, the two parties can be private.

2。You're not driving a motorized vehicle, you're driving a non-motorized vehicle. So even if you go to the traffic police brigade to report to the police, you may not accept it.

3。If you can provide evidence to prove that the child suddenly rushed into the driveway, causing the accident, then you will only bear half of the responsibility at most, and the parents obviously did not fulfill their guardianship obligations and need to bear some responsibility.

4。It has nothing to do with your boss. So he is not responsible.

5。The route has nothing to do with this accident, don't think about it.

In summary, you can discuss this issue with the parents of the child. Make it clear that since you have already borne the medical expenses, you should not bear the rest.

1. With those 30,000 yuan, it is enough to hire a lawyer. Only scammed 6,000 and gave the boss 30,000?

2. Fraud is a public prosecution crime, and it is not allowed to be private, and it is up to the procuratorate to decide whether to prosecute and pursue your friend's criminal responsibility, and the boss's "non-prosecution" does not work: the 30,000 yuan you gave the boss is just a private civil compensation issue (in fact, only 6,000 is enough), and the criminal part of the boss can't manage it. The police will continue to investigate, the procuratorate may prosecute, and the court will hear and sentence you.

3. Let the boss write a letter of understanding, which can be used as a discretionary mitigating circumstance when submitted to the court in the future.

4. Before the court hears and decides, the family members of the unconvicted prisoner are not allowed to see him. Lawyers may meet, correspond, and learn about the case, but family members may not.

5. If possible, ask the boss to get the money back, ask a lawyer or defend yourself, try to repent of your guilt, and strive for a light sentence if you can make restitution, have no criminal record, and have a good attitude of admitting guilt.

If you understand, defend yourself.

1. Legal. The three departments are all administrative entities and can jointly enforce the law.

2. Incorrect.

According to Article 4 of the Measures for the Investigation and Punishment of Unlicensed Operations, the following illegal acts shall be investigated and dealt with by the administrative department for industry and commerce in accordance with the provisions of these Measures:

5) Illegal business activities that exceed the scope of business approved and registered, and engage in business activities that should only be engaged in after obtaining a license or other approval documents without authorization.

Article 9 The administrative department for industry and commerce at or above the county level may exercise the following functions and powers when investigating and cracking down on suspected unlicensed business activities:

1) Order the cessation of relevant business activities;

2) Investigate and learn about the situation from units and individuals related to unlicensed business activities;

3) Entering unlicensed business premises to carry out on-site stool inspections;

4) Inspecting, copying, sealing, or seizing contracts, bills, account books, and other materials related to unlicensed business operations;

5) Sealing or seizing tools, equipment, raw materials, products (commodities) and other property specially used to engage in unlicensed business activities;

6) Seal up unlicensed business premises where there is evidence that endangers human health, has major safety hazards, threatens public safety, or destroys environmental resources.

According to Article 2, there is no such penalty as a penalty for operating without a license.

3. Zhao's request to revoke the penalty decision of the three organs shall be the defendant of the three organs that made the punishment, not the reconsideration organ.

You have to consider the risks of this:

1. You know that the enterprise has property that may be enforced, so if the creditor of the enterprise believes that the enterprise is maliciously colluding with you to transfer property, then your mortgage contract may be found invalid, and the house may still be enforced;

2. There is no big problem in terms of procedure, and the mortgage procedure can be completed smoothly.

1.The Housing Authority can register the mortgage.

2.There are certain risks associated with this. Although secured claims have priority over unsecured claims, if the earlier claim is registered as a mortgage first, the first registered claim will be repaid.

If the property is not frozen, seized, it's fine. There won't be anything. However, it is better to mortgage in the name of the company.