Could a legal expert help me analyze it?

Regardless of whether you are pregnant or not, you are not legally responsible for criminal law.

However, civil liability depends on the circumstances.

a.If you are not pregnant, congratulations!There is no need to bear any civil liability.

b.If you are pregnant, and the child is born, survives. Then you are the father of the child, and the parent-child relationship will not be affected by anything, so you need to raise the child or pay for the maintenance of the child (until adulthood).

This request can be fulfilled by the woman through legal means. In this case, it is recommended that you take a one-time "closing" approach. But don't forget to sign a written contract to prevent the other party from repudiating it later.

Overall, you don't need to worry. There will be no serious consequences.

Finally, you need to be criticized for this unethical behavior!

Your situation is a typical extramarital affair. Legally, the problem is so uncomfortable. It's troublesome, though. Who knows what the other person will do?

Your conduct violates the Marriage Act's prohibition on cohabitation by a spouse, and if the divorce results in divorce, the innocent party is entitled to claim damages;

If the sexual relationship is consensual, she has no reason to sue you, regardless of whether she is pregnant or not.

Sex outside of marriage is morally condemnable and is not currently punishable by law.

There are no de facto legal consequences, and the social impact is almost there.

The current law will not hold you accountable for any wrongdoing, and you will only accept the condemnation of the ethics court.

On the interpersonal side, you may be affected by some (including your wife). Child. Close relatives. Friends).

But the law will not make judgments that are harmful to you. After all, you love me.

Morally you are to be condemned!I'm kind enough to reconcile and apologize, so it's too late!

There is no provision for this in the law.

Voluntary or not voluntary is what you are saying, what if she denies it?

From a legal point of view, your thinking is a bit confusing, your purpose is to need money, what is the relationship with this contract?You didn't make that clear. I can only answer you one question at a time.

1. Sublease and transfer are different expressions. To be precise, a sublease is a release to someone else, a transfer is a sale to someone else, the house is not yours, you have no right to sell, so the transfer does not actually exist. It's just that we ordinary people usually confuse these two concepts.

I don't know what you mean, is it that subletting means someone else taking over your business, and transferring means someone else taking over the house to do other business? If so, legally, it's all called subletting.

2. According to the contract, during the lease period, you have no right to sublease, and when the lease expires, the contract will be terminated, and there is no question of the successor. It doesn't make sense for the landlord to tell you that.

3. According to the contract, you don't need to sublet, in fact, talk to the landlord and give him a certain amount of liquidated damages. Legally, you pay him a maximum of 5,000 yuan, and the matter is settled. However, I thought that 5000 didn't need to be given to him, you could talk to him, say that he is really in trouble now, need to terminate the contract early, consider his losses, you can supplement some of his money, and even find a new tenant for him.

Business is not in favor.

4. You belong to a civil dispute, you only lose money, and you do not go to jail, that is to say, even if you leave now, the big deal is to lose money, and you will not go to prison, which you can rest assured. Unless, he provokes you, you beat him.

1.Assignment is the complete transfer of the rights and obligations of the contract to a third party, and no longer have any connection with the contract. Sublease means that you, as the lessor, lease the rights and obligations of the contract, but you assume the corresponding obligations and enjoy the corresponding rights to the original lessor.

2.I don't see what the landlord meant from your contract, it should be what he said.3Probably not, the contract stipulates that you sublease A has the right to terminate the contract to take back the shop, and require you to pay 5,000 yuan in liquidated damages.

4.It's not going to jail, it's okay to argue. He has the right to take back the shop and the right to demand liquidated damages from you. That's all, nothing else.

1. The object of sublease is the rental house, and according to the contract, Party B does not have the right to sublease at any time, so Party B cannot sublease the house. As for the transfer, the questioner probably meant that the transfer of the shop business together with the rental house essentially included the subletting of the house, which was also a breach of the contract.

2. If the above is the full text of the contract, the two parties only agree that Party B does not enjoy the right to sublease, Party A shall not take back the shop without permission, and the liability of both parties for breach of contract. Both parties should perform the contract in good faith, and since the lease period has not expired, Party B should not terminate the contract in principle.

3. According to the provisions of the contract, with reference to 1, the consequence of Party B's unauthorized transfer may be that Party A terminates the contract and takes back the shop, then Party B may not only bear the adverse consequences of the contract, but also may have to bear the liability for breach of contract to the transferee.

4. If you hide from the landlord to someone else's shop, you should bear the contract responsibility and other adverse consequences, as described in 3. He is prosecuted, and Party B only bears civil liability. Imprisonment is a criminal responsibility, and criminals sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment and life imprisonment are sentenced to prison to carry out their sentences, commonly known as imprisonment; Fines are generally an administrative liability. The dispute between you and the landlord is civil liability, and the consequence is to compensate for the damage.

In this case, Party B may negotiate with Party A to change the contract; It is also possible to pay liquidated damages and terminate the performance of the contract early; It is also possible to transfer its rights and obligations in the contract to a third party with the consent of Party A, that is to say, with the consent of Party A, Party B will find another lessee for Party A and withdraw by itself.

Alternatively, other options may be considered, such as hiring someone to take care of the store.

1. Keep evidence, such as witness testimony, relevant circumstances at the scene, call records of the police, children's injury reports, records, expense lists, etc., and find someone to detain his motorcycle;

2. Require the traffic police to conduct accident identification as soon as possible, and the police will coordinate compensation matters;

3. Go to the court to sue the driver and ask him to compensate for the loss.

4, he wants to sue you for hurting people, let him sue him, a slap is not enough to commit any crime, I don't believe that the local small police station can cover the sky with one hand. Besides, the cell is overcrowded right now, and there is no place for you.

5. If the police station messes around, go to the Public Security Bureau to sue the Discipline Inspection Commission, but it really can't be done, and the police station will be ended.

You hit someone and you get into a traffic accident with someone else are two different things.

So you should be held accountable for your own beatings. You only slapped someone in the face, and asked that person to go to the hospital to see a doctor, and you have to pay for any medical expenses. As for making you guilty of intentional injury, it depends on how you beat others, and if you don't cause internal injury, you shouldn't be guilty.

As for the police station looking for you again, you must believe the law, and if the police station says that you will be held legally responsible, you must say that you agree to deal with it according to the law, and at the same time ask for an appraisal of the person who was beaten to see if it constitutes harm. With the appraisal, it will be clear whether you are guilty or not.

To add that the police station can decide to detain you for a few days at most, and then release you after a few days. Moreover, the police station itself cannot decide to detain the person, and the police station must report to the county-level public security bureau for approval if the person is to be detained.

First of all, the other party must bear the corresponding responsibility for the crime of causing a traffic accident. 1. Bear the child's ** expenses. 2. Bear the corresponding administrative responsibility and even criminal responsibility.

Second, the slap you slap does not constitute the crime of intentional injury, and the crime of intentional injury requires that the result of causing more than minor injury to the other party is the crime of intentional injury, and your conduct is obviously minor and the harm is not great, so it does not constitute criminal responsibility.

Third, the local courts are not in charge of the public security bureaus at the same level, and China is a typical example of the administration over the judiciary. If that person has a close relationship with the police station, you can directly file an administrative reconsideration with the higher-level organ of the police station, that is, the higher-level public security bureau or the people. If there is still favoritism in the administrative reconsideration, the lawsuit should be filed directly with the court.

1. Motorcycles bear the responsibility for traffic accidents; Handled by the traffic police;

2. You bear the responsibility of beating people, and the police station will handle it;

3. Two things, the bridge is the bridge and the road is the road;

4. It is recommended that the negotiation is the best.

1. Legal. The three departments are all administrative entities and can jointly enforce the law.

2. Incorrect.

According to Article 4 of the Measures for the Investigation and Punishment of Unlicensed Operations, the following illegal acts shall be investigated and dealt with by the administrative department for industry and commerce in accordance with the provisions of these Measures:

5) Illegal business activities that exceed the scope of business approved and registered, and engage in business activities that should only be engaged in after obtaining a license or other approval documents without authorization.

Article 9 The administrative department for industry and commerce at or above the county level may exercise the following functions and powers when investigating and cracking down on suspected unlicensed business activities:

1) Order the cessation of relevant business activities;

2) Investigate and learn about the situation from units and individuals related to unlicensed business activities;

3) Entering unlicensed business premises to carry out on-site stool inspections;

4) Inspecting, copying, sealing, or seizing contracts, bills, account books, and other materials related to unlicensed business operations;

5) Sealing or seizing tools, equipment, raw materials, products (commodities) and other property specially used to engage in unlicensed business activities;

6) Seal up unlicensed business premises where there is evidence that endangers human health, has major safety hazards, threatens public safety, or destroys environmental resources.

According to Article 2, there is no such penalty as a penalty for operating without a license.

3. Zhao's request to revoke the penalty decision of the three organs shall be the defendant of the three organs that made the punishment, not the reconsideration organ.

1. Not illegal.

2. Unreasonable.

3. The court shall issue a legal bill.

4. Not illegal. The court is afraid to inform you that you will transfer the property.