In recent times, I have rarely heard of the great discoveries of the scientific community, have you

I haven't heard of any major discoveries in the scientific community for a while, not because of a bottleneck, but because general scientific theories or research are based on the accumulation of time, and time is not very fast, like Einstein and Newton are theories that have been studied for a long time.

The development of science has always required time to accumulate, and it takes a long time to accumulate, especially basic science theories. From Newton's classical mechanics to Einstein's theory of relativity, it took three hundred years, and now the theory of relativity has only been proposed for about a hundred years, and the so-called "no fundamental breakthrough" is also normal!

In fact, more often than not, it's because we're so caught up in it that we don't feel the scientific breakthrough. Just like at the beginning of the last century, Einstein's theory of relativity was not recognized for a long time, and in recent decades it has become a well-known theory after continuous verification by the scientific community, and people at that time would not consider the theory of relativity a major breakthrough!

If you think about the history of ancient mankind, if the breakthrough you are talking about is a breakthrough like Newton's classical mechanics and Einstein's theory of relativity, and ancient humans have not made a breakthrough for thousands of years, this is even more abnormal!

To put it bluntly, major breakthroughs in scientific theories need to be accumulated, quantitative changes cause qualitative changes, and there will be no breakthroughs in scientific theories without the contributions of countless scientists.

Nowadays, the development of human science is becoming more and more subdivided, and many scientists need to work together. At the same time, the development and application of artificial intelligence, biotechnology, quantum technology and other aspects are actually scientific breakthroughs!

However, scientists have made a great breakthrough in unifying the basic forces of nature, unifying the electromagnetic force, the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force, and the current difference is gravity. Once these four basic forces are unified, it is likely to cause a great change in human science again!

In general, the development of the scientific community is accumulated over time, not by encountering bottlenecks and slowing down. Perhaps there will be some major scientific breakthroughs in the near future.

The biggest bottleneck lies in the dimensional level of human beings. Because science is human-centered, human beings can perceive information from a very low level, just like ants use antennae and blind people use crutches. Therefore, when a blind man is trying to "feel" a color with the crutch in his hand, this behavior touches the absolute bottleneck of science, and he is doing a cross-dimensional move.

Therefore, it is only when the human species is promoted that science will be qualitatively promoted along with the upgrading of information. When you are still relying on limited information to deduce, analyze, calculate, hypothesize, and prove whether the earth is round or flat, those "high-level people" are directly "seeing", everything is already clear, and they have already told you everything.

Yes. Because the development of science and technology is endless, and there is no bottleneck, mankind can continue to progress.

Of course, there is no end to the development of science, and the development of science is still in continuous progress, and the progress of human civilization will never stop.

There is no bottleneck, and progress can be continued. Human creativity is unlimited, and human creativity will bring about technological innovation, progress and development. Nowadays, all countries attach great importance to education and the cultivation of talents, so the development of technology will also be the general trend.

The development of theoretical physics has reached a bottleneck, which will affect the development of science and technology, we can use vision to understand the mass and weight of matter and the structure of matter, but in the field of energy, such as fire, light, electricity, magnetism, force and temperature, etc., these things without mass and weight and structure of matter cannot be recognized by conventional cognitive methods, which is the main reason for the difficulty of development. It is only by possessing the cognitive mode of energetics that we can explain the microscopic world of space.

No, it's okay, because aren't we breaking through ourselves now?

Human beings have had scientific research since ancient times, and thousands of years have passed since the development of the world, especially since the First World War, the scientific and technological development of various countries has progressed very rapidly, but the scientific and technological progress cannot be endless, because of the constraints of various reasons, scientific and technological progress will encounter bottlenecks.

What I'm going to talk about today is the area of energy utilization. Because energy utilization accounts for more than 80% of the world's total, all kinds of cars, ships, airplanes, including the electricity used in our lives are a kind of consumable energy, but how can we improve energy efficiency? Decades have passed since the Second World War, and there has been no breakthrough in this issue.

In terms of ordinary energy utilization, such as the oil we commonly use, this energy is a kind of consumable with a little less, from the invention of the first car and the first airplane to the present is the use of oil, scientists around the world have long been studying ways to strengthen the use of oil or new energy that can replace oil, but even so far there is no energy saving purpose is no alternative high-efficiency new energy, jet aircraft fly two hours on the consumption of tons of fuel, Cars consume more than 10 liters of oil when they travel 100 kilometers, and the problem of energy consumption has always been a gap that cannot be crossed by the scientific community, which may be the bottleneck of the scientific and technological community. In terms of energy utilization in the field of military aerospace.

Since 1905, Einstein proposed the mass-energy conversion formula, although there has been great progress in the use of nuclear energy, but since World War II, it has basically stayed on the hurdle of nuclear fission for 50 years without new progress, and today's nuclear submarines, aircraft carriers, nuclear power plants and other fields that use nuclear energy are basically the use of nuclear fission energy methods, if you want to pursue higher energy utilization then the study of nuclear fusion is the goal, However, with the current technology, it will take at least 300 years later, and if there is a higher level of energy, such as dark matter energy, it will be at least a few thousand years later.

No, technology is still evolving, it's just that many technologies haven't been announced yet.

This is not the case, human technology has not yet reached a bottleneck, and it is endless.

Not really, scientific and technological progress is never-ending, and it may only be difficult to break through for a while.

Human science and technology have not reached a bottleneck at all, and there is still a lot of room for improvement.

Human technology has not yet reached a bottleneck, and it is endless.

This is not true, because science is advancing all the time. It's just that some sciences are difficult to break through, and some are easy to break through.

Human technology has been advancing, for example, in terms of artificial intelligence.

That's for sure, everything has a certain degree, and there will be a limit to a certain amount of time, otherwise many problems will be solved.

It's not that science has hit a bottleneck, it's just that technology is now developed enough. The early development of science was a blank for all disciplines, and it was easier to make achievements, and the earlier science was done, the easier it became, and the later it became, the more complex it became, and the more difficult it was to make achievements.

Only more and more advanced, step by step.

Why are there no scientists like Albert Einstein and Newton in modern times? Is science hit a bottleneck?

Einstein and Newton's apple.

The idea of the unity of two people is, in essence, relative in the broad sense and relative in the narrow sense. Only physics and mathematics are reflected.

The reason why there are no great scientists like Einstein Newton in modern times is that science has encountered a bottleneck, because they all lived in the era of relatively early science, so they can draw many great conclusions, but the closer they are to the frontier, the more difficult it is to study scientific theories.

The early development of science was said to be blank for every discipline, and it was relatively easy to make certain achievements. The great breakthrough in human science and technology is an act of accumulation over a long period of time, and it is not because there is an excellent theory put forward by people across the ages.

Mathematics has always been a successful way to study physics, but now it doesn't work, and the scientific community hasn't found a new way to do it, so science is in winter.

The main reason is that modern science has encountered a bottleneck and has not been able to make a qualitative leap.

Modern science has reached a certain height, and it is difficult to surpass the current science, so it can be said that it has stagnated.

It's because there are many people who think that the current development of science is not particularly fast, but I don't think so, I think the speed of modern science is still very fast, and it has not stagnated.

No, it won't be locked. Physics needs human ingenuity to break through innovation again, and technology will become more powerful.

I don't think it's really locked up yet, it's just still developing, there's no breakthrough, and it's going to be fine soon.

And the bottleneck was not reached. Modern physics has been constantly developing and expanding, and it will only develop better and better, and human science and technology have been constantly innovating and progressing.

It doesn't lock up, a lot of things are not perfect, and we're just scratching the surface.

The development of superstring theory may have reached a bottleneck, so that it is difficult to make new breakthroughs.

Yes. At this stage, the superstring theory still lacks enough convincing power for the various multidimensional universe models that exist, because it is unwilling to invest the budget in the production of large colliders, so there has been no new information for a long time.

The development of superstring theory has encountered a bottleneck, which is why it has not been updated for a long time, and it is not uncommon for modern physics to encounter a bottleneck at any time.

The development of superstring theory may have hit a bottleneck, making it difficult to make new breakthroughs.

As an epoch-making theory, superstring theory has far-reaching significance for the development of physics. It is an organic combination of general relativity and quantum mechanics, which has helped physicists and related scientific research to a great extent. A new beginning.

Therefore, it is no exaggeration to say that superstring theory can even be hailed as an important landmark theory in physics. In the 21st century, neither quantum mechanics nor general relativity can solve all problems. In physics, both quantum mechanics or general relativity are used as one of the tools to solve problems.

There are exceptions in this case. The singularity of black holes must be solved using two theories. The organic combination of general relativity and quantum mechanics is a relatively difficult problem.

Scientists have found that the theory of relativity, contrary to general relativity, has a role in promoting the development of quantum mechanics.

I think it's a bottleneck, because this theory is relatively difficult to overcome, and since there has been no news for so long, I think it must have encountered difficulties somewhere, and there is no corresponding explanation.

It has been millions of years since the birth of human beings, throughout the history of mankind, there have been many shining figures in the long river of years, among which the most brilliant and dazzling are scientists, these scientists have left an indelible mark in different fields, such as Copernicus, Newton, Tesla, Einstein, Galileo, Hawking, etc., these are well-known and well-known scientists, with their superb wisdom to promote social development, has made a great contribution to mankind!

Albert Einstein is known as one of the most creative scientists in human history and the greatest scientist of the 20th century. He was born in 1879 and died on April 18, 1955.

<> Einstein has played a role in promoting the development of natural science, and it is also leapfrogging, so that human civilization has entered the next era, Einstein launched a revolutionary subversion for the scientific community with the power of one person, and the theory proposed by Einstein is also generally recognized by the world's scientists, optimists will say that the speed of our scientific and technological progress is changing with each passing day, new technologies and new inventions emerge in an endless stream, and the future development of science and technology is bright, but in fact, human science and technology is in a bottleneck period, After Einstein put forward the theory of relativity, almost all of human physical theories only stayed at repairing and proving the original theories, and the scientific and technological theories of human beings have been spinning in the same place.

The progress of science and technology is inseparable from the hard work of each generation of scientific research workers, it is undeniable that the science that emerged in modern society is not at the same level as that of Einstein's era, the influence is not at the same level, from the industrial society to the later scientific and technological revolution, it took only 100 years to upgrade, and then to today's Internet information age, in the past 40 years, the most successful human beings should be AI artificial intelligence, I believe that in the near future, human beings will give birth to a great scientist like Einstein!

Because science has reached a bottleneck, but it is not without breakthroughs, and there are still many small breakthroughs in gradual development, but there are no major inventions.

No. Because genius has always existed, but Einstein's achievements were too high for later geniuses to reach, so it is not that there is no genius.