Is it a sick sentence for a star to draw a slender red light in the sky?

It's not a sick sentence, it's just that the description is wrong, the stars can't draw red light, and the sick sentence is generally a wrong word or an unclear reference to the meaning of Qi Qi does not correspond before and after.

This sentence is a sick sentence, the word star should be qualified in front of it, it should be said that it is a meteor, and some pops can draw a slender red light, which can be corrected like this: pop draws a slender red light in the sky.

On the surface, it looks like a sick sentence, but in fact, if you understand it carefully, it is to describe people in a beautiful place to let their mood be released and feel good.

This is not a sick sentence, it is an anthropomorphic sentence, the stars cannot draw light, only people can draw light, so it is not a sick sentence.

I'm not done, do you say that the stars draw a slender red light in the sky, is it a sick sentence? I think it's a sick sentence, and the stars can't be seen at all.

This one makes a lot of sense. It's not a sick sentence. Anthropomorphism is adopted.

It's not a sick sentence, and it reads very smoothly.

Yes, it is impossible for a star to glow red.

It can be added that it seems to be the most beautiful meteor shower.

The night sky hung with a bright moon and many land hengjiSparklingof the stars.

Although the "shining" in the original sentence is in line with the spoken expression, it is not standardized in the written language. In order to more accurately describe the state of the stars in the night sky for morning socks, the phrase "shining" can be used instead of "shining", which is more in line with the norms of the written language.

The night sky is hung with a bright moon and many shining stars. Analogical rhetoric is not a sick sentence.

The ancients had clouds: the moon and stars are rare. It means that when the moon is bright, the stars are scarce and bright. From this, it can be understood that the problem in the sentence is that there is a contradiction. The revised sentence could look like this: I look at the bright moon and twinkling stars in the sky.

Starlight is tiny in our eyes" is a mismatched sentence. "Starlight" is something that has no shape and cannot be described as "small".

The modification is as follows: Starlight is very in our naked eyesFaint.

There are many, many unclear stars in the sky, and the sentence is modified as:

1. There are many stars in the sky.

2. There are countless stars in the sky.

3. There are too many stars in the sky to count.

Many, many and too many to count are repetitive, so it is enough to delete one of them.

**: 1. Improper use of words, where is it under the night sky?

2. It's inconsistent, the so-called "moon stars are rare", where is the sky full of stars?

**: 1. Improper use of words, where is it under the night sky?

2. It's inconsistent, the so-called "moon stars are rare", where is the sky full of stars?