Whoever understands the law will help me, and those who know the law will help me

First, the loan was borrowed from the bank in the name of the factory, and from the perspective of your brother-in-law's status as the chairman, the loan agreement should be valid. Therefore, the market should have the obligation to repay the loan.

Second, your brother-in-law embezzled the money from the yard without permission, which constituted the crime of embezzlement, and your father and uncle should go to the police and ask the police to arrest your brother-in-law.

Third, the market is jointly opened by the shareholders, and the shareholders bear limited liability. Banks can only ask the market to repay the money, but not the shareholders individually.

Fourth, if the amount of money involved is large, it is recommended to hire a professional lawyer**.

Of course, it can, it should be won, and the factory will go through bankruptcy liquidation procedures, and there are many complicated procedures, and it is already a crime for him to take the money and run away.

It mainly depends on what the formalities look like.

Also, if the loan runs away, it should belong, and it belongs to the crime of embezzlement, because it is convenient to use work.

1. Is there a written contract or agreement when transferring shares? How not, your dad is responsible for this money!

Second, in a lawsuit with your uncle, he must appear in court as a defendant! He's in ** now?

Three, lawsuits with those friends? Who is the defendant? Are you dad or are they? Sue what?

Fourth, if you win the lawsuit, you will sentence him to return the money, but the actual implementation may be more difficult, Laibei!

To sum up: your case is incomplete!

Your relatives opened a steel mill together, and you didn't explain the nature of the factory, so you described that your company's business should be a limited liability company, right? This is critical. In the case of a limited liability company, you are liable to the extent of the amount of capital, and your father transferred the shares to your uncle, and if there is evidence to prove it, your father is no longer liable for compensation.

That is, the factory has nothing to do with your home.

You can now go to the police department to report the case, and your uncle's behavior should be in line with the crime of financial fraud. (The factory stopped production and deliberately took out a loan when it was unable to repay).

1. They do not have the power to set such a large fine, which is an illegal act.

2. No matter who signs the contract with the big factory or the small factory, both parties must hold one copy each. It's also illegal for them not to give you a written contract. If you go to court, you don't need your contract to come out, but they need to prove it.

But when the time comes, they will naturally come out. That's fine.

3. The 5w penalized by the big factory does not need you to come out, because of the contract you signed with the small factory. are not parties to the rights and obligations between them.

4. Personally, I think that you are weak and the subject matter is very small, so you can sue together with others. Or consider other avenues. Let's say arbitration.

More than 300 should buy a lesson, it is not enough to protect rights and toss. When we are cornered, we are told that there is a law, and when we turn to the law, we are told that there are unspoken rules.

Compared to the black brick kiln, you are already very good.

300 yuan is not to make trouble, there is no contract that cannot be won, and it seems that you are still cheating.