Case questions about law, understand the law, learn the law with the help of law!

Case 1. 1) Not assumed. Because the product has not yet entered the market, that is, the producer itself has not put the product into circulation, according to the provisions of the Product Quality Law, it is not liable for compensation. (In layman's terms, it is just kept in the warehouse, or it can not be sold).

2) Wang is definitely responsible (you understand this). As for Li, it depends on whether he knows it or not (if he knows that he stole it and bought it, he will be responsible; If you don't know, don't).

Case 2. 1) False propaganda. The provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law on the use of advertisements for false advertising shall apply.

2) The supervision and inspection department shall order the illegal act to be stopped, eliminate the impact, and may impose a fine of between 10,000 and 200,000 RMB depending on the circumstances.

1) Should the electric heating plant be liable for compensation? Why? (2) Who should compensate for Li's losses?

Without compensation, normally speaking, Li's loss is compensated by the seller or producer, and the seller's loss is compensated by the producer, but the difference in this question is that Wang's acquisition is an illegal act, not obtained in good faith, and is not protected by law, so Wang is solely liable for compensation.

1. The legal consequences of Li should be borne by Wang's son.

2. The medicine should be bought by the Wang family, because Li was the trustee in this case, and his behavior was completely in accordance with Wang's entrustment, and there was nothing that did not comply with the entrustment. And after buying the medicinal materials, due to the death of the client, the fact of their commission still exists. Wang's son, as the legal heir, should pay for the purchase.

A1The Wang family should bear it.

2.The medicine should have been bought by the Wang family, as they agreed that it was a verbal agreement, and that the death of their father was not a valid reason to terminate the agreement

The legal consequences shall be borne by the Wang family.

The medicine should be bought at the expense of the Wang family. Li and Wang entered into an oral agreement, and the death of their father is not a valid reason for terminating the agreement, and should be performed in accordance with the law.

(1) Party B's laying of laminate flooring constitutes an anticipatory breach of contract.

2) No, because the mis-laying of the floor does not meet the conditions of the right to defend against uneasiness under the Contract Law of China, and the title does not state whether each payment of A is made according to the progress of the renovation or purely according to the time.

3) No, because the floor is proved to be laminate flooring and non-solid wood flooring, it means that A has reasonable and convincing grounds to believe that B is in breach of contract, and B has not expressed to A that it has the intention to remedy its breach of contract. Since the floor accounts for a significant share of the decoration of the whole house, the value of solid wood flooring and laminate flooring is very different, and once the floor is laid, it will be difficult to split again, and the splitting will affect the overall progress of the project and the damage to the object, it should be said that the behavior of the real estate developer has constituted a breach of the main payment obligation, so A can stop his payment obligation by first performing the right of defense.

4) B's right to terminate the contract is not established, because B's request for termination of the contract does not meet the conditions for terminating the contract under the Contract Law, and if B is at fault, the termination of the contract will cause significant losses to the other party, the contract shall not be terminated.

1.The act of giving A and B to C is a disposition without authority, and B's gift to C without compensation does not constitute a bona fide acquisition, so A is still the owner.

2.A is not criminally liable because minors over the age of 14 but under the age of 16 are criminally liable for only 8 acts, excluding theft.

1. The criminal victim also appealed. (The victim has no right to appeal, and the procuratorate needs to raise a prosecutorial counter-appeal) 2. The second-instance people's court conducted a closed trial of the case by a single-judge panel composed of adjudicator Zhao, (the single-judge system is not applicable in the second-instance trial,) 3. The Intermediate People's Court of a certain city again had the collegial panel hear the case in private, (remanded for retrial to restart the first-instance trial procedures) and told the defendant that this judgment is final and cannot be appealed. (This is a remand for a new trial, and the judgment in accordance with the first-instance trial procedure can also be appealed) 4. There was no defender present in the previous trials, and the courts explained that we had fulfilled our obligation to tell and that he himself had the ability to appoint a defender but did not appoint a defender.

Where the defendant might be sentenced to life imprisonment or death, a defender shall be retained, and the judicial organ that the defendant has not retained shall designate a defense for him) One point is omitted, and juvenile cases should not be tried in public.

1. Minors under the age of 15 cannot be tried in public.

2. The judgment is erroneous, and the juvenile is generally not sentenced indefinitely. 3. Single-judge trials are not applicable to second-instance trials where the sentence is too heavy.

4. The reaffirmed court shall hear the case in public.

5. The retrial is subject to appeal and is not a final judgment.

6. If there is no defender present in several trials before and after there is no condition, the court shall appoint a defender for juveniles.

1. Under the age of 16, the trial shall not be held in public.

2. Those under the age of 16 shall not be sentenced to death.

3. The second-instance trial shall not be tried by a single-judge court.

4. Remand for retrial is a first-instance procedure and can be appealed.

5. A guardian must be present at the juvenile trial.

6. Minors must have a defender when they are tried.

Hello, why is the first instance final? That's not bad, is it big.

1.constitutes an offence, 2In the crime of theft, the offender wants to steal real money, but what he actually steals is counterfeit money, which belongs to imaginary competition, and according to the light punishment, it belongs to the crime of theft, because counterfeit money is also worth some money in the market.

1. Constituting a crime.

2. It is a crime of theft (attempt). The subjective aspect has the purpose of secretly stealing 2,900 yuan of currency, and the objective aspect has also achieved the goal, the subject is no problem, and the object aspect of these counterfeit coins has the external manifestation of monetary value, which is in line with the property attributes. The main reason why it was determined to be an attempt was that the actual nature of the object (counterfeit money) (non-legal property) caused the defendant to fail to cause the property loss of the other party due to an error in judgment.

According to the legal analysis, counterfeit money should be confiscated, so it has no value.