-
In fact, it can be useful, and it can also protect them, usually reducing some damage, and it can also be used to defend against their attack power.
-
Useful. First, it reduces the enemy's advance speed and gives the soldiers enough time to fight. Second, it can give the enemy the illusion that there are mines.
-
Yes. "Foxhole" is one of the safest places in the war, including in modern warfare, the example of soldiers using "foxhole" is still very common, it is said that even American GIs like to avoid the foxhole, this pit is not large, mostly a pit of one or two meters of space, it is an effective shelter for skirmishers to avoid shells, the general position is dug more hidden, there are not many obstacles above, it is conducive to detecting the enemy situation and timely return fire, not only can avoid the indiscriminate bombardment of enemy aircraft artillery, but also can avoid stray bullets, shock waves, etc., It is equivalent to the necessary fortification of the individual soldier to save his life.
-
Useful and able to protect them at some important moments, so they dig some foxholes every time.
-
When fighting, the foxholes dug by the soldiers, which can prevent a large number of grenades and shells, reduce the ** on the soldiers, and can indeed protect them and make them less harmful.
-
The foxhole dug by the soldier is very useful in battle, for example, when the shell falls nearby, you can jump into the foxhole to protect yourself, the fragments of the shell will not blow up yourself, and you can protect your life with a high probability.
-
Useful hailstorms, foxholes can dodge the enemy's strafing and most of the damage of bombs, we can also understand it this way, if digging foxholes is useless, then why should soldiers waste their efforts to dig it, so foxholes are still useful.
-
Digging foxholes to avoid shells is a useful way. Because digging a pit can hide Min Zao's own body in the soil, so that the fragments brought by the cannonballs will not scratch themselves.
-
The foxhole can effectively protect against all kinds of light and heavy gun shrapnel and shock waves, and it is also convenient for individual soldiers to observe and shoot, which is useful for individual combat at any time.
-
Useful. The main lethality of artillery shells comes from the shrapnel produced by **, and foxholes can effectively prevent damage caused by shrapnel.
-
It's still somewhat useful. But it's not very useful, if the shells are really next to **, they can still blow up the soldiers, so they just want to have peace of mind.
-
During the Second World War, artillery far surpassed rifles and machine guns in terms of their killing efficiency. According to some post-war statistics, about 60% of the soldiers in World War II were caused by artillery, and it can be said that artillery was the "number one killer" during World War II. In order to escape the shells, soldiers during World War II would dig foxholes on the battlefield.
A foxhole is a simple fortification, usually a foxhole can accommodate one or two soldiers, and the soldiers hide in the foxhole to shoot, but also rely on the foxhole to hide from shells and bullets.
The foxhole has a strong effect on preventing the attack of artillery shells, there are three main ways for artillery shells to kill and injure soldiers, the first is a powerful shock wave generated by **, which can shatter the internal organs of soldiers and tear the soldiers' bodies apart. Even if the soldier is not in the center of the **, he still cannot dodge the attack of the shockwave. However, the shockwaves are all spread horizontally, and if a soldier hides in a foxhole, he will be able to rely on the crater to cancel out most of the shockwave's power.
The second way is the fragments produced by **, shell fragments are the main way of killing artillery, and the shells will release a large number of fragments when **, these fragments have different forms and are more lethal than bullets. Because the killing range of artillery shell fragments is very large, and the killing power is relatively large, as long as the soldier is within the attack range of the shell fragments, he will basically be hit by the fragments of the shell. Soldiers hiding in foxholes can effectively dodge the attack of artillery shell fragments, even if the soldier is hit by some powerful shell fragments, the shell fragments are already very powerful after penetrating the soil.
The third way is the loud noise generated by **, because the sound of ** is relatively loud, and the person in the center of ** will be shocked to death by the loud noise generated by ** even if they are not hit by the shock wave and shrapnel. Because foxholes do not have the ability to insulate sound, if a cannonball lands near a foxhole, the people inside the crater will still be injured by the loud noise generated by the shell**. In general, foxholes can defend against most of the damage of artillery shells, effectively protecting the lives of soldiers, so soldiers digging foxholes during combat must have the effect of dodging shells.
-
It is useful for soldiers to dig foxholes in the ground to avoid shells. When being hit by the enemy's shells, hiding in the foxhole can effectively avoid the shell attack and save your own life and health.
-
It was very useful for soldiers to dig pits in the ground to avoid shells, and this method had developed a tactical approach at the time.
-
Definitely useful, these foxholes can effectively cope with shells **.
-
In various war films at home or abroad, the audience can often see the scene of being heavily bombarded by one side's position, the soldiers hiding in the craters left behind the shells, and finally surviving the fires everywhere.
So, is the big blind reed pit left behind by the shells the safest place on the battlefield? In fact, the mystery that the characters behind the screen can survive hiding in the shell crater is mostly because he is the protagonist. Whether the crater itself is safe or not is difficult to say.
The crater itself may not be safe. When a large number of shells fall from the sky, the distribution of the landing point is actually in the entire area, maybe accurately hit the designated position, or deviate from a certain distance, whether the shells are ** is also an uncertain factor. In other words, it's a metaphysical property that is indeterminate – it has to do with the environment of the battlefield and the type of shell.
The main soldiers will have a feeling that there will be no more shells where the shells have fallen, and therefore it is safe.
If there is a deep trench and a strong fortress, it is better to stay inside. In modern times, in the era when all kinds of precision guidance are flying all over the sky, it is very unwise to avoid bomb craters. When the Northern Alliance united with the US military to attack the Taliban, as soon as the US bomb landed, the ignorant Taliban also felt that there would be no more fire from the place where the bomb fell, and then they scrambled to get into the crater.
Then, the next bomb was unbiased into the craters of the Taliban, smashing a bunch of brainless fanatics.
In fact, when the artillery grinding balance bullet bursts, it is not as we usually imagine that it will blow people into meat sauce, not everyone can be so "honored" to be directly hit by the shell, but the trigger of the warhead of the shell or the proximity fuse (many anti-aircraft artillery shells have radio proximity fuses) are stimulated and ignited, triggering the ** of the warhead, and hurting people through the flying fragments produced by **, so as to achieve the purpose of eliminating and weakening the enemy's vital force, and the splashed fragments are flying towards the sky, It's like when we throw a rock at a splash of water that goes up instead of down, and we've never heard of a few flying fragments burrowing deep into the ground like armor-piercing bullets, so jumping into a foxhole at this time will dodge the flying fragments, and while you may not be immune to damage, you actually have a 70% higher chance of surviving than standing on the ground.
Although I have never been in a war or been on the battlefield, I feel that digging foxholes is very useful, and it can greatly reduce the number of soldiers when the opponent's shells wash the ground. However, if you get too close, even if you are not hit by shrapnel, you will be killed or injured by the shock wave.
-
It is possible to dodge the shells to a certain extent, because the fragments produced after the shell** fly at an altitude above the ground.
-
This is a useful state attack, because the foxholes are dug deeper, and when the shells come to close the attack, hide in it, although some will blow through, but the effective reduction of the number of people brought by the shelling **, thus ensuring the safety of the combat troops.
-
During World War II, it was useful for soldiers to dig foxholes in the ground to avoid shells, which reduced their bomb area and could protect themselves well.
-
It is useful that the shell** will produce a huge air wave, and the foxhole can effectively resist the air wave and block the shrapnel generated by **.
-
It has a certain effect, because the fragments scattered in all directions after the shell ** stool seeps will cause great damage to the soldiers, and the foxhole can effectively avoid this kind of damage, as long as the shell does not directly hit the foxhole, this measure is still quite effective.
-
Useful. Because the shells of the World War II period were not very powerful, and the foxhole can effectively reduce the impact of **, it is useful.
-
It's not a useful grind. Because the attack power of the shells at that time was very large. Its closed area is very wide and radiates from the ground. So it's useless to dodge like this.
-
It worked, in the conditions of that time were very poor, digging foxholes was an effective way to hide from shells, it could reduce the number of soldiers, but if the bombardment was intensive, the number of people was also quite large.
-
During World War II, it was of course very useful for soldiers to dig foxholes in the ground, which were used to hide from shells, which could effectively reduce the lethality of shells, thereby saving more soldiers' lives.
-
It still has a certain effect, because if you dig some foxholes, then some fragments of the shells won't hurt you. Of course, if the shells are really around you**, then even hiding in a foxhole, it will still hurt you a lot.
-
Of course it works. In war, foxholes can effectively protect the enemy's light and heavy firepower, artillery shrapnel, aircraft bombardment, and the shock wave after the shell**. It can provide effective protection for soldiers who fight alone.
They don't dare to play dead, there must be a reason. And this reason is actually just that even if they pretend to be dead, they can't live, it's better to do something vigorous, and maybe they can end up with the title of a martyr. It can even be admired by people. >>>More
In ancient times, when there were no banks, soldiers would send some of their salaries home, and the other would be spent on the spot. Although there were no banks in ancient times, there were some ways to send them home. And the army is often followed by caravans, so the money can be spent. >>>More
Many people often watch martial arts** and some ancient movies, and they will find a problem. In every dynasty there were some particularly powerful martial arts masters, but these masters disappeared in the war. Those martial artists basically don't go to the battlefield very much, why is that? >>>More
The reason why the big clubs did not poach the young Messi is due to the following reasons:First of all, Barcelona has the grace of knowing Messi, Messi's feelings for Barcelona are very deep, and it is extremely difficult to poach them; In addition, Messi is the focus of Barcelona's training, the core of the team's future, and not for sale; Moreover, when Messi was young, not everyone was optimistic about his future development. >>>More
When fighting, at least rush to the front, and those on foot follow behind, and now it is mostly used to obey others.