Is spending more tuition to send children to private schools an IQ tax ?

Not counting the IQ tax, as we all know, public primary and secondary schools are all compulsory, and tuition costs almost nothing. Private schools, on the other hand, are built with private capital and have a for-profit purpose, and the level of fees is significantly higher than that of public schools.

Under the supervision and management of higher-level departments, public schools need to do a good job in "universal education" within the scope of various laws and policies. Although the tuition fees are indeed relatively high, as long as parents are willing to pay, then self-financing and self-operated private schools, of course, will spare no effort to maximize the supervision of students to improve their test scores with a strict and harsh school-running model.

For ordinary children from ordinary families, it is not necessarily bad to enter public schools, through the cultivation of compulsory education, to enter high school and university in a step-by-step manner, and to study seriously.

But if you, as a parent, have high economic returns, good family conditions, and are willing to let your children enter private schools to receive a different or extra "elite education" through parents spending more money and children suffering more, then perhaps private schools are indeed a good choice. It is also for the better development of children, and in general, it is not an IQ tax.

Spending more tuition to send children to private schools must be an IQ tax, because private schools charge too much, the knowledge learned is the same, public teachers teach better, and the nine-year compulsory education is free. So there is no need to go to a private school.

Hello: Spending more tuition to send children to private schools is not an IQ tax, because private schools are relatively high compared to public schools, but the teaching facilities, school environment, or accommodation conditions will be better than public schools, and public schools have stricter requirements for foreign children.

Therefore, some foreign children have no choice but to choose private schools.

As far as I know, the class size in private schools will indeed be a little smaller. In general, the size of a class in a private school is about 20 students, while the size of a class in a public school is about 50 students.

In terms of the average amount of educational resources, it seems that private schools have an absolute advantage. This is also the biggest selling point of private school admissions publicity.

With the same number of teachers, a class of about 50 people in a public school shares this resource, while a private school shares this resource with about 20 people. Of course, private schools receive more attention per student than public schools. This is an undeniable fact!

However, there are two sides to everything. Public schools have a large class size, and although they do not have an advantage in the average amount of educational resources, they have an unsurpassable "basic skill" in the average amount of educational resources paid to jointly support them.

In other words, private schools charge high fees, in large part because the number of students is too small compared to public schools. The extra tuition fees that parents spend are not necessarily spent on better educational resources, but are likely to be spent on buying large bills for minority groups.

In other words, even if private schools use the same educational resources as public schools, the number of students is far less than that of public schools, and the funds needed to keep schools running are already several times higher than those of public schools.

Therefore, blindly chasing more tuition fees to send children to private schools will often be reduced to an "IQ tax"!

No, private has the advantage of being private. Of course, some private schools do have an IQ tax. But it can't be generalized.

The pit must be an "IQ tax", why do you say that?

There are many private schools in our country, **different, some **high, some **low, but **high will be good!

Choosing a school is like choosing a commodity, people subconsciously think that **high must be ***, but the fact is that there is special, but it is not good**, but some people still buy expensive, as long as it exists, they can sell things, expensive products and cheap products are definitely better, but this cost performance is definitely low.

Schools are the same, everyone thinks that spending more money to send children to private schools can get a good education, but those expensive schools are just good packaging, good teaching equipment, good environment, if a child really wants to study hard, the external environment is useless.

Instead of spending more money to let them go to any private school, it is better to have a good education by their parents, and now parents, who are not well educated themselves, like to push to the school, relying on the school to educate their children to become talents, so even if you spend more money to go to a good school, it is better to have a good parent.

Just look at the results, I haven't heard of many children who are educated by private schools that cost a lot of money.

Spend money to send your child to a private school. It is not necessary to send such an expensive school to your child because of the IQ tax, you can let your child go to public school to learn the same, knowledge.

To put it mildly, if the child does not focus on learning, spend a lot of money, it is not very necessary to send the child to a private high school, of course, if the family economy allows, it is also within the scope of the parents' ability, if it is purely for the child's grades, the child from your private high school to the child, it may be a turning point in his life. According to the reality of the situation, whether you choose a public school or a private school for your child, whether your child will study hard and whether you have great expectations for your future is the premise of choosing a school for your child.

The teaching level of public high schools is completely assured, and the teaching team is also very good, many teachers are teachers who have the ability and experience and skills, and have been employed for a long time, and the student fees are not high; The disadvantage is that schools will pay more attention to "cramming" education, the teaching mode is relatively boring, and teachers are not able to take care of every student.

In addition, some private high schools will pay more attention to the quality of students, and also tend to the all-round development of students, the control is relatively relaxed, and the admission rate is also very high every year; The disadvantage is that the cost of students is relatively expensive, the average family can not afford it, the teachers are not very good, most of the teachers are young, and the mobility of teachers is also large, which will have a negative effect on the learning of students.

Vocational high schools can allow students to have their own professional strengths, can have a good skill, and the employment rate is relatively high in the next job, the disadvantage is that the school will be more inclined to practical operation than cultural theory, and some vocational high schools have a very poor atmosphere, and students are likely to be unwilling to make progress under the influence of the environment.

Rather than a variety of knowledge, skills and abilities, attitude is the most fundamental thing for students to improve their scores. As the saying goes, "attitude determines everything", the right learning attitude can bring great effects to students' learning, and it is also the initial stage of success.

Whether it is a school for students to choose or a teacher to choose a school for employment, the teachers of the school must be carefully considered, but they still have pros and cons, students have good habits, teachers have strong strength, must have their own place, so in today's educational background, students' own ability is the "key" to success.

I don't think it's necessary. I believe that if children want to learn, no matter if they are in the middle of the uproar, they will have results. Private schools have high tuition fees and a lot of pressure.

I don't think it's necessary, because if the family conditions are not good, there is no need to send the child to a private school, and it is not conducive to his development.

There is no need. Because the child's grades are mainly dependent on the child's own, I don't think it's really necessary.

At present, a very real problem is that many high-quality private schools are much better than public schools in terms of operating conditions, management, and education and teaching quality. This is the fundamental reason why parents would rather pay so much money and send their children to private schools.

First, high-quality private schools generally have superior conditions for running schools.

I don't know how other places are, as far as our local area is concerned, the school conditions are superior, the teachers are abundant, and the admission rate is high, basically a few well-known private schools. Many high-quality private schools occupy group companies behind them, or hang the title of high school attached to famous universities, with strong financial support and human information resources, basically not affected by the interference and influence of the education system, and have relatively relaxed freedom to run schools.

Second, the teaching staff of high-quality private schools is relatively young, with a high level of academic qualifications and a relatively reasonable structure.

Better private schools generally hire better school administrators and teachers from the city, the province, and even the whole country with high salaries. The teaching team has a great advantage in terms of subject allocation, age structure, and academic level, and the exit mechanism of teachers is particularly strict, and they will leave if they do not do well. As far as our local area is concerned, there is a middle school with more than 30 provincial and municipal teaching experts.

In public schools, there is an aging of teachers, an uneven subject structure, and a generally low salary of teachers, and teacher burnout is very serious.

Third, private schools have greater freedom to run their own schools.

Private schools strive for survival and development by quality. Therefore, in terms of internal management, education and teaching, teacher team construction, school connotation development, etc., they are relatively refined, performance-oriented, and have particularly high management requirements. Therefore, the quality of education and teaching in high-quality private schools is generally relatively high.

Fourth, high-quality private schools generally implement hierarchical management and seamless management.

From the child's entry into school, class, eating, sleeping, activities, etc., every important time and link is managed by a special person, which truly realizes seamless management. Moreover, in private schools, the division of labor among teachers and staff is very clear, the responsibilities are in place, and each person's job responsibilities, management responsibilities, and double responsibilities are very specific, and the implementation is several layers of networking, grid management. Therefore, the safety, learning, living, rest, and activities of students in school are better guaranteed.

To sum up, the competition between education is essentially the competition for educational resources. The competition for educational resources is essentially the competition for teachers. High-quality private schools not only have superior conditions for running schools, strict and standardized management, but also have a strong teaching team, and the quality of education and teaching is generally high.

Therefore, parents would rather pay expensive tuition fees than send their children to private schools.

Private schools are relatively higher than public schools, fees are generally higher, private schools are indeed better in terms of teaching quality and service level, not all private schools are impeccable, some private schools also have certain teaching problems, and even the level of teaching services is not as good as public schools, some parents will spend ** to send their children to private schools, in fact, the main purpose is to hope that children can receive a better education, can enjoy better educational resources. In response to this question, Mr. Xiaojiang would like to share a few personal views.

First: the enrollment threshold of private schools is high, and the tuition fee is not cheap, and the enrollment threshold of private schools is relatively high, whether it is a private kindergarten or a private middle school, the enrollment threshold is set relatively high, for example, some private kindergartens need parents to interview when recruiting students, and even require children to have a certain level of English, if the parents do not pass the interview process, and the child's English proficiency is relatively poor, so even if parents have the right, they may not be able to enter private kindergartens.

The enrollment threshold of private schools is high, and the tuition fee collection standard is relatively high, and the tuition fee of some private schools may be as much as tens of thousands of yuan a year, or even hundreds of thousands, and the relatively high tuition fee collection standard to a certain extent also reflects that private schools can provide students with better education services and provide students with better educational resources.

At that time, parents must have a clear understanding that not all private schools can provide high-quality teaching and education services, and some private schools also have certain problems in running schools, and it is difficult to ensure the quality of teaching and the level of service.

Second: the reason why parents would rather spend ** to send their children to private schools is actually obvious In the eyes of parents, private schools can provide better teaching services, and they have to enter private schools, so they can enjoy more high-quality educational resources, have a better learning environment, and be able to study with excellent students, which is conducive to children's learning and growth.

Of course, for some stages with limited financial ability, there is no need to feel sorry for not sending the child to a private school, in the view of the teacher, whether the child can become a talent, does not depend on the private school or public school, but depends on the child's personal efforts, if the child's mind is not on the study at all, even if it is in a private school, then the learning effect will not be very good.