Is the consciousness of the poor the same as that of raising children in poverty?

Updated on parenting 2024-07-22
25 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    The consciousness of the poor is generally from the bottom of their hearts that they are very inferior, and they also feel that they are inferior, and will infect this kind of thinking to their children. However, raising children in poverty is to give children enough love, and there is no shortage of children's education, but only to reduce some material needs for children.

    Many people feel that their family situation is not particularly good, not as good as others, so they will be very inferior, and this kind of poor consciousness is also deeply ingrained in everyone's heart. In fact, their poor consciousness really blocks their way forward, if we don't have this poor consciousness and feel that we are equal to others, then we will be brave to pursue some opportunities. But if you have the consciousness of being poor, you will feel that you are always inferior to others, and you are not as good as others.

    And for many people who have the consciousness of being poor, they feel that others are good to them, but they only look down on themselves, and their hearts are generally very twisted and terrible.

    Poor children refer to not blindly meeting the material needs of children, many children will have some material needs, they hope that their parents can help them buy something, and most children have their own things to buy, some parents will repeatedly ask their children if they feel that there is no need to buy this thing. If the child insists on buying it, the parents will agree, but later they will tell the child in this way that this is not right, the money must be spent on the blade, and the parents who raise their children will never take the initiative to cry poverty to their children.

    Poverty is not the original sin, then the guilty thing is that everyone knows that they are poor, they don't want to make progress, they don't know how to work hard, and they have been transmitting their poor consciousness to their children, wanting their children to become people like themselves. And when the child wants to buy something, he will always say that there is no money in the family, etc., and such practices will only affect the child's growth.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Of course, it is different, poor children refer to the meaning of children, poor consciousness will make children become very humble, very bad for children's growth, sometimes, children's hearts will also be greatly distorted.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    It's different, these two kinds of consciousness are not the same, they all need to have a scale, they can't instill bad thoughts in their children, otherwise children will become more and more inferior, and they can educate children to be in charge of the house early through the consciousness of the poor, to be independent, and to cherish money, so it's okay.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    It is the same, that is, because the money they have is very small, so their consciousness and the method of educating their children to live are the same.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    It's different, family education is different, and the school is different, so the consciousness of the two children is also different.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Many parents confuse poor children with poor consciousness, but there is a big difference between poor children and poor consciousness, and poor children will also make children successful, once everyone instills poor consciousness in children, it will make children become very inferior.

    Raising children in poverty means that after satisfying the child's basic material purity foundation, he will not buy some other things for the child. This kind of education is to let children know that it is not easy to make money, but they do not cry to children that they are poor, and children have everything they should have, and they do not lack anything more than others. But instilling the consciousness of the poor is that when the child asks for something, the parent begins to tell the child how difficult it is to make money and how poor the family is.

    If this is done for a long time, it will make the child develop a very low self-esteem, and it will make the child feel that he is inferior to others.

    Is it a child's responsibility to be poor? Is it because the child is suspicious that the family becomes poor? Why cry poor to your child?

    If it is said that parents always cry poverty to their children, it will only make children more and more inferior, and it will only make children hate parents more and more. And in the long run, it will also let the child develop a pleasing personality, in the study, in the workplace, will always blindly please others, and others will not treat your child as a friend, will only use your child as a tool to vent.

    Once you cry too much to your child, you will let your child form a pleasing personality, even if others are very excessive to your child, the child will accept it, and will feel that if you have resistance, your good friend will leave you. In fact, others don't regard your child as a good friend at all, but just use your child as a tool for venting and as an errand tool. But because your children have lived in such an environment since they were young, once others treat them well, they will die and follow others.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    There is a big difference, if you are poor, you will make your child very inferior, and your character will be very weak, and raising a poor child will cultivate your child's strong willpower.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The difference is huge. The consciousness of the poor is to educate children through this way of education, but there is no material shortage of children. Raising children in poverty refers to the promotion of children to the elderly if there is a certain lack of material resources.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The difference is very big, it will have a great impact on the child's stupid laughter, affect the child's normal life, affect the child's daily life, affect the child's learning ability, and affect the child's personality.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Not the same. The consciousness of the poor is to instill some limited thoughts in the children, and the poor children are to let the children suffer materially, and the gap between the two is very large.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It's different, raising children in poverty is a process and a concept, and the consciousness of the poor is a living thought.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    These two are completely different. Raising children in poverty is one way, but poor consciousness is one thought. Poor people shout that children can't give children a superior life before pretending. The consciousness of the poor is a hall of negative consciousness.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The two are not the same at all. It is one way to raise a child out of poverty, but the consciousness of the poor is a kind of ideological uproar. Poor children cannot give them a superior life. Bad consciousness is a negative consciousness.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Poverty is not the goal, the concept is the core, as the saying goes: poor sons, rich daughters. But in reality, there has to be a degree to it.

    First of all, it is necessary to distinguish between those who are poor and those who are rich. Whether it is economically poor or rich or spiritually poor or rich, distinguish between this problem and talk about the problem of poor sons and rich daughters! In fact, many parents have not figured out this relationship themselves, but have entered the misunderstanding of raising children!

    Yes, in the eyes of Chinese parents, boys can only be superior to others if they "suffer hardship", but how many parents know that there are great drawbacks to "raising children poorly".

    First: Poor raising will make the child lose his generosity and decency.

    In most families in China today, in fact, they are ordinary, but they are not ordinary enough to meet the basic needs of their children, in addition to food and clothing, parents should give their children both external and internal, external to meet the dress, use is no worse than most of their peers, not the best, but should also be upper-middle; At the same time as giving the child the outside, in fact, it is also giving the child the inside, he does not have to compare with others for the most basic things, he will think about things will be more meaningful, and he will be generous and decent in handling things, and will not be a big man who seems stingy and makes others look down on himself.

    Second: Poor upbringing will make children lose their temperament.

    At first glance, in addition to his appearance, the most attractive thing should be temperament, temperament may be an ethereal thing for many people, but in fact, when we cultivate children, we should let him have his own temperament, and temperament is formed by a person's insight + cultivation + words and deeds; And the formation of temperament needs to be properly enriched.

    Third: Poverty will make the child lose the pattern.

    Spending money to travel to see the world and participate in more paid learning can often broaden the child's horizons, so that he has a blind vision and a pattern, which is lacking in poverty.

    Fourth: He will have low self-esteem.

    Poor raising is easy to make people feel inferior, we can see that there is a big difference between children in the countryside and the city, You Zhaokong especially when they are in the new environment together for the first time, you can tell which are the children in the city at a glance, because the children in the countryside will appear cramped when getting along with others, and when talking to others, it is obvious that the knowledge is inferior, but they are just peers, and many children in the countryside will have a sense of inferiority in front of the city people.

    Parents' giving should be just right, and find a good balance.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    It's not the same. The difference in education and attitudes, the consciousness of the poor is deep-rooted and not easy to detect. Raising a poor child is a mental suppression, which will make the child feel inferior. out of the world.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The consciousness of the poor and the poor raising children are definitely different, the two biggest differences are that the poor children of Fantong are to let the children cultivate his hard-working spirit, so that the children cherish the food, cherish the current living environment, and work hard. The poor man means that the poor person's mode of thinking about the source is different from the poor raising children. State fissure.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    In the same way, because the consciousness of the poor will affect the character of the child, the child will also develop the thinking of the poor.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Yes, there is no difference between the bad and the bad in this way, which will also lead to the child becoming more and more inferior, affecting the child's correct values and money misconceptions, and affecting normal life.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    It is not the same that the consciousness of the poor refers to the spiritual poverty of raising children, and the material wealth of raising children, but poor raising of children refers to the spiritual and material poor support.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    It's not the same. These are two different concepts, there is no way to put them together, the consciousness of the poor refers to the fact that because of the suspicion of life, there are some problems in their perception of the world, and the poor children are just strict requirements to defeat the reputation, the child has a strict plan for the child's life, the difference is relatively large, and the impact on the child is completely different.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Of course it's the same. The big difference is that the way of education is different, the method of education is different, the teaching of simple and virtual reasoning to children is different, and the education bureau of children is different.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    There are many netizens who don't understand the difference between poor consciousness and poor children, but in fact, there is an essential difference between the two. First of all, the consciousness of the poor refers to the fact that when parents educate their children, they will always instill in their children some awareness that they are very poor, and always talk about how difficult it is to work and make money in front of their children. When the child asks his parents for something, his parents will say in front of the children that the family is very poor, and over time, the child will develop a poor mentality, so that the child feels inferior to other people.

    Raising children in poverty refers to trying to meet the material needs of children, but when the basic needs are met, they will not buy other luxury things for children, and they will not buy some useless things. This kind of education is actually very good, and it can make children understand how difficult it is to make money. In this way, the child has everything he should have, and there will be no obvious gap with other children, so the child will not have an inferiority complex.

    In this comparison, netizens will find that they can raise children poorly at home, but don't transmit a sense of poverty to children, because raising children poorly is just to let their children understand that it is not easy to make money, understand the importance of money, and develop a character that does not waste casually. However, the consciousness of the poor is a useless indoctrination, which will only make their children more and more inferior, and this inferiority complex will have a great impact on children in the future.

    Therefore, I also advise all parents to be poor when educating their children, but never always pass on books to their children, poor consciousness, otherwise, they will understand such evil consequences in the future. Children should indeed cherish money and know how to be thrifty, but they can't feel inferior casually, if the child has an inferiority complex, after entering the society, it will also be greatly affected.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    There is a difference, generally these people's living conditions are not particularly good, so they are not willing to invest too much money and time when raising children, and Li Lanchun will often pass on a bad idea to the child, which will make the child more and more inferior, and the concept is completely different.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    The difference is very large. The consciousness of the poor is that the thinking in terms of wealth is relatively narrow, and the vision is very short-sighted, and only considers the immediate interests. Raising children in poverty means not giving children a lot of money to spend and quarrel with, so that children can realize that it is not easy and hard to make money.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    I think there is a difference in thinking, in behavior, in education, in dealing with the absence of questions, and in personality.

Related questions
13 answers2024-07-22

The similarity is very large, but it will be different, first, the person who has just died before reincarnation (generally no more than 49 days) into the bardo body, the bardo body has supernatural powers, can see what you can't see before you die, can hear what you can't hear before you die, and the scene you see is also very different from when you were alive, so it's not impossible to change your consciousness, emotions and morals. Second, after reincarnation, they will be confused (e.g., reincarnated as a human being), but their habits will remain a lot. >>>More

11 answers2024-07-22

Judging from the **, this peace buckle of yours is jadeite. In the discipline of jewelry and jade, "jade" and "jade" are two different concepts, jade contains jadeite, and jadeite is only one of the jade. In the understanding of the jade industry or some consumers, "jade" is equal to a specific jade variety, some people will commonly refer to jadeite as "jade", and some people will refer to Hetian jade as "jade". >>>More

10 answers2024-07-22

It's definitely not the same, at least when I was a teacher, the child ate much better than us, the baby is a nutritious meal, and what to eat at each meal from Monday to Friday is a good match. And our teacher is the kind that eats a pot of ** vegetables and adds some meat scraps into it, which is the cheapest. It's good to stir-fry a pot of shredded meat for you occasionally, but it's always more vegetables and less meat, and the kindergarten teachers are all girls, and they don't eat much meat, so they don't think there's anything, anyway, just eat a meal at noon. >>>More

16 answers2024-07-22

Mind.,Because it's more insecure to be with a guy who looks short.。 >>>More

25 answers2024-07-22

The two are completely different, not something that can be explained in one or two sentences, and SLR is not easy to play. It takes a long time to master the correct **, and you have to pay attention to hand tremor, white balance, aperture, **compensation or something, and more. DC's functional SLR is basically there, but most of them don't support video, but I seem to have heard that some machines now have them, but I haven't seen them. >>>More