The views of countries on the Syrian issue, on the Syrian war

I'll tell you what Russia thinks, and you can think for yourself in China.

As a "former power", Russia has been striving to contain the Western forces led by the United States without provoking the United States, which is not about justice, but prevention. In the same way, the United States did not take Russia's ideology lightly because of the change in its ideology after the end of the Cold War, and the fact that the anti-missile system was placed in front of Russia's house shows this.

Syria and Iran are political opponents of the United States, and Russia is happy to see them in the first place, as a buffer zone to contain the United States without confronting itself directly with the opponent, so that he cannot sit idly by and watch this chess piece be eaten casually, and must do his best to keep it. Because apparently there is only one barrier after Syria and Iran. However, Russia's opposition has a bottom line, just like the War of the former Yugoslavia, once it involves military confrontation with the United States and Europe, Russia can only retreat.

Even during the Cold War, Russia rarely intervened directly militarily, at best, at the point of delivery ** or something.

Russia's opposition is entirely motivated by the dream of preserving Russia's great power chauvinism, and if it can be an influential country, it will be beneficial to foreign exchanges and economic interests.

The ideal way for the United States to enhance its influence in order to safeguard its national interests is to make itself a spokesman for "morality." The fundamental purpose of relying on overwhelming military superiority to support foreign policy is, of course, to safeguard national interests, and whether or not it has promoted the "moral" development of the international community at the same time is a matter of opinion. On the one hand, some Western countries follow the United States because they have the same goals as the United States, and on the other hand, they have the inertial thinking of the Cold War, and on the other hand, "democracy" is indeed a common understanding in the past that was said in China.

People will only find something to do when they are full, and these countries want to do some "charity" to help the world and save people when they are economically comfortable. No matter what others say, at least most of them still approve of it in their own countries, otherwise with the direct election system of the West, those who go against the will of the people will be easily driven out**.

Some countries do not want to interfere, because once interventionism is popular, it is difficult to guarantee that it will not fall on them.

China is committed to a peaceful settlement of the Syrian issue. Non-interference in the internal affairs of Syria.

Syria's internal affairs are indeed unladylike, and I have not yet found a convincing objection to this, so I have to admit it. But the Spanish Revolt newspaper said that some powerful countries have forgotten history: the sectarian contradictions in the Middle East today were created by the Western colonial era.

It was planted back then, and now it sprouts, but it has become an excuse for Western interference...

Great power game. The United States (NATO countries) seeks its own interests, which conflicts with the interests of Russia and China. Because Russia has suffered losses on the Libyan issue, it has joined hands with China to resist the internationalization of the Syrian war.

Economically, the United States is interested in Syria's natural resources, and politically, NATO's eastward expansion has put pressure on China and Russia, and has also brought benefits to Israeli Jews. The United States has always fought Arab countries, similar in nature to the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. Hope it helps!!

If China doesn't help, China itself will be next.

From the perspective of the development of the world political landscape, the turmoil in Syria is a continuation and development of the changes in West Asia and North Africa. It is undeniable that these countries in the Middle East have encountered huge obstacles in their respective development paths due to imported inflationary pressures after the financial crisis, and the continuous sectarian strife of various political factions (Sunnis, Shiites) in the country has led to economic depression, low employment, social protests and mass violence. In any case, the situation in Syria remains a national development issue, an internal affair, not an international affair.

However, Syria's close proximity to Iraq, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Turkey and other countries echoes that of Iran, and its geographical location has extremely sensitive geopolitical overtones. Therefore, in the past, Syria has inadvertently played an extremely delicate and crucial role in regional affairs involving the sensitive nerves of the West, such as the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks, the reconstruction of Iraq, the counter-terrorism in the Middle East, the Iranian nuclear issue, and the Kurdish national issue. Moreover, to the great uneasiness of the Western world, the Assad family, which rules this geopolitical "battleground," continues to be a maverick that is incompatible with Western society.

In the face of the intensification of contradictions in Syria, Western countries naturally actively intervened, hoping to take this opportunity to promote change through pressure, and then achieve the goal of controlling the political situation and natural resources in the Middle East through the change of regime in Syria.

China (China) views the Syrian issue as follows:

1. Syria is Russia's core interest, not China's. China really doesn't have any views on the situation in Syria, and it is only because of the relationship between China and Russia that it supports Syria.

2. China has a very good relationship with Syria's enemies, such as Saudi Arabia and Israel, (but its relationship with Syria is average), so it is impossible for China to openly support or oppose anything. If China intervenes too much, it will make Middle Eastern countries (such as Saudi Arabia and Iran) uneasy, which will not be good for China and its relations.

3. On the Syrian issue, China has always adhered to the political settlement of the Syrian issue and put forward ideas for resolving it. China believes that the settlement of the Syrian issue must always follow the right direction of the "five insistences".

The first is to insist on resolving the Syrian issue through political means.

The second is to insist that the Syrian people decide the future of the country independently.

Third, we need to promote an inclusive political process and start an equal, inclusive and open political dialogue as soon as possible.

Fourth, we should persist in achieving national reconciliation and unity in Syria.

Fifth, we should continue to carry out humanitarian assistance in Syria and neighboring countries, and continue to increase humanitarian assistance to the Syrian people and neighboring countries.

Whether it's Libya or Syria. It's all about oil, but the main issue is a dispute between the United States and the United States in order to determine its hegemony in the Middle East. In other words, the ** head is a subsidiary of the United States, and if you don't listen to me, I will replace you.

I'll kill you if you don't. Whether it's sovereignty or politics, it's up to me to decide. What ** army or armed organization is completely disagreeing with the US hegemony and paying attention to the contest of power politics, but it is just a moth to the fire.

International students are not stupid, looking for death in that chaotic place, there are thirty-six plans.

It's not an oil issue, it's a geopolitical issue, starting with Libya, then conquering Syria, marching into the Islamic world in the Middle East, encircling Iran, and then China and Russia encircling the encirclement in the West.