How to understand that man is an end, not a means .

"Man is an end, not a means" is understood to be an end, living in a kingdom of ends. Man is an end in itself, not a tool. Man is a free man who legislates and obeys by himself. Man is also the lawgiver of nature.

For the happiness of the many, and to use the sacrifice of the few for the "happiness" of the majority (even at the cost of life), the interests of the minority and the minority (in this case, including property rights).

the right to life, etc.) are used as tools and means to achieve the interests of the majority.

"Man is an end, not a means" inspires meaning

An interpretation of this sentence in real life, once people can be used as tools, following this logic, human society will inevitably come to the stage of "arbitrarily using people as tools", and the exploitation of a group of people by a group of people will be unscrupulous, and the means of using "tools" will be cruel and bloody.

In such a society or a group under such rules, the weak will have no room to live, or the only living space is to be displayed in the tool room as a tool of the strong, and they can be used and appointed.

Man can only be an end, not a means", because once man can be a means, then such a society will inevitably be full of exploitation, oppression, and evil, and man does not care about being called a man.

Marxism believes that man is not only the creator of value things, but also the enjoyer of value things, so man himself is both an end and a means at the same time, and is the unity of opposites between ends and means. ThisTell us that the so-called positive eugenics, sex selection, cloning of superhumans, and other practices that purely "produce" human beings as means are degrading the dignity and worth of human beings.

On the question of what man is, Western humanistic philosophy only believes that man is the end, while Marxist philosophy believes that man is both an end and a means, because man is of course an end, but in order to achieve his own end, man must regard himself as a means, and only by treating himself as a means can he achieve his own end. So man is not a pure end, man must be both an end and a means.

Ends and means can be transformed into each other under certain conditions.

Since the means that people use to achieve their ends are created by themselves, at a certain stage or within a certain range, people can regard the creation of a certain means as an end, and an already realized end can become a means to achieve another end.

According to this fact, Marxism distinguishes between strategic and strategic, partial and total, current and long-term, and so on, stressing that it is necessary to attach importance to both strategic, partial, and immediate goals as well as strategic, overall, and long-term goals, and to regard the former as a bridge to achieve the latter.

Man is an end and not a means" The implication of the phrase is that man cannot be seen merely as a means to an end, but as an end in itself. Kant emphasized that man is the main end and the means secondary. This means that people should not be seen merely as tools to achieve an end, but as an end in itself.

This view emphasizes the dignity and worth of the human person, arguing that the human person should be respected and valued, not seen as a tool to an end. In practice, this requires us to respect the freedom and dignity of each person and to focus on their interests and welfare.

On the other hand, if people are seen as means, then they may be exploited and exploited, and their freedom and dignity may be violated. Thus, treating the human person as an end rather than a means contributes to the protection of human freedom and dignity and to the promotion of justice and harmony in society.

In conclusion, the idea that "man is an end and not a means" emphasizes the dignity and worth of the human person and requires us to respect the freedoms and rights of each person and to focus on their interests and welfare.

On the question of what man is, Western humanistic philosophy only believes that man is the end, while Marxist philosophy believes that man is both an end and a means, because man is of course an end, but in order to achieve his own end, man must regard himself as a means, and only by treating himself as a means can he achieve his own end. Therefore, man is not a pure end, man must be both an end and a means, so a is chosen for this question.

Pragmatism ... Materialism, that's Marx. It is estimated that this is the case, and the ,,, of studying philosophy in five or six years has almost forgotten.

Man is an end, not a means.

In the book "Li Dan's Talk Show Training Manual", his intuitive elaboration of this sentence inspired me the most.

He writes about these stool rolls in the book, and every sentence you read, you can feel strong emotions, even beams, as if trying to wake up some people:

1.The purpose of constantly opening the microphone and performing is to train yourself, not to blow up the field.

2.yourself hard, the stronger you are, the more viewers you will find, rather than the more people you can please, the more viewers you will have.

3.The explosion is a by-product, just as fame and fortune are also by-products;

4.Man is an end, not a means, and this is not only a moral requirement, but also a very rational conclusion.

5.Use yourself as a means, and you can master second-rate means at most. Only by taking yourself as the ultimate goal will you have a chance to master the first-class means.

6.The purpose of life is to achieve a better version of yourself.

This also echoes Nietzsche's sentence:

A person who knows what he lives for can endure any kind of life.

The truth is the same.

The original intention determines your ceiling and pattern.

When you recognize that the purpose of your work is to become a better version of yourself, then you will not choose to retreat from the troubles you encounter at work, but to face the difficulties and try your best to solve them.

For those difficult people in the company, you will not easily choose to leave, but seek a better communication model.

For the treatment that you think is not fair enough, you will not feel wronged in every way, but think about how to surpass your current self.

The same is true in life.

Whether you are married now or not, or happy in your marriage, if you recognize your life goal, not to please anyone, but to cultivate into a better version of yourself, you will most likely not worry about whether the other party loves you or not, and think about something that disturbs your mind all day long.

It's about going all out and doing what you can do, which is the right way.

Remember, you are your end, not the means.

When you put your time far away, elevate your identity, and then look at the people and things around you from a different angle, you will find that the number of resentful, hateful, and reproachful people is greatly reduced, but you need to cultivate day after day to become a better version of yourself.

All in all, don't forget why you set out and want to get there.

A little girl who was lying on the ground, she had no strength to walk because of hunger, and her mother was waiting not far away to receive relief food, and she did not have time to take care of her for a while. She wears a humanitarian aid bracelet on her body, and she can't tell her real age because she is so thin.

At this moment, a vulture flew up behind the little girl, as if waiting for her death, and then feasted. Carter was stunned by this image, and he adjusted the angle to shoot "The Hungry Sultan" with tears in his eyes, and then chased the vulture away, leaning alone under a tree and silently weeping.

Later, this ** was published on the front page of the New York Times in the United States, and Carter won the Pulitzer Prize for journalism in 1994, but since then he has been criticized and attacked by all walks of life. A Florida journalist wrote in an op-ed: "He was a selfish journalist who won a Pulitzer Prize by stepping on the corpse of a little girl.

He's just another vulture. ”

These malicious remarks, coupled with the peculiarities of Carter's profession, always saw images of despair, blood, and violence, and eventually his spiritual world was shattered. On July 27, 1994, Carter committed suicide by using carbon monoxide in his car, saying that he was sorry to everyone.

Why go against the heart of man for the sake of pursuit.

Using human means, even if it is self, there will be a day when you will go against yourself. What is felt is not the supreme honor, but the exact pain.

Man should be an end rather than a means, not a tool of development, and everything he does is for the sake of man himself, not for anything else. We don't make art for art's sake, we do art for the sake of people themselves being able to draw happiness and knowledge from it; We are not happy for the sake of being happy, we are happy for the positive feedback that people themselves can get happy.

Man is always the subject, and everything else is the object. Immanuel Kant said, "Nothing can be pursued above human ends, no matter what banner it bears." ”

You will always be your own subject, and you must not allow yourself to become a slave to other things or other people's thoughts, a tool of society.

Purpose, as long as you succeed, no one will remember what means you use, unless someone has a heart.

Answer: Doctors help patients to relieve their suffering, and they cannot regard the evaluation of professional titles, making money, and fame as the goal, and the students and patients as the means.

1) It is a self-centered bourgeois life value. Historical materialism holds that in any society, the members of the society are both ends and means, and they all serve each other, and it is always the unity of ends and means.

2) Marx proposed that each person can only achieve his own ends as a means to another person; Each person can be the means of another person only as an end in himself, and each person is a means and an end at the same time, and only by becoming a means can he achieve his own end.

3) If we talk one-sidedly about people as an end, we are essentially treating ourselves as an end and turning others and society into means to satisfy our own desires. This is an extremely selfish value in life.

128. The value of people and their realization.

1) The value of human beings exists in social relations. (Select).

2) The relationship between human value is the relationship between personal self-worth and social value.

3) The value of human beings includes two aspects. Society's respect and satisfaction for the individual. Individual responsibility and contribution to society.

4) The criterion for evaluating the value of a person should be a combination of the two aspects. On the issue of the relationship between the two, historical materialism first emphasizes the individual's contribution to society and others, that is, the social value of human beings comes first.

5) The most basic relationship between human value is the relationship between tool and purpose. Man is both an end and a means, and the unity of ends and means.