Why did Qin Shi Huang issue an order to kill his most satisfactory successor, Fusu?

Updated on history 2024-07-21
13 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    Because Fusu has always been disobedient to Qin Shi Huang. Fusu's personality is too benevolent, which is completely opposite to Qin Shi Huang, and Fusu always looks down on Qin Shi Huang's practices and always opposes him.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    It was not Qin Shi Huang's decree, but Zhao Gao and Li Si tampered with Qin Shi Huang's decree and renamed Hu Hai as the crown prince. Fusu knew that the truth would definitely take revenge, so he was killed by Zhao Gao's false holy decree.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Clause. 1. From some historical records, it can be seen that Qin Shi Huang's most satisfied son was indeed Fusu, but he died of illness during Qin Shi Huang's parade. Clause.

    Second, at that time, Zhao Gao and others had always been at odds with Fusu's son, so it is possible that the three of them forged an edict to let Hu Hai succeed to the throne and kill Fusu at the same time.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    This decree was not issued by Qin Shi Huang, but after the death of Qin Shi Huang, Hu Hai's teacher Zhao Gao falsely passed on the holy decree, which led to the death of his son Fusu. This is Zhao Gao's conspiracy to put Hu Hai on the throne.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Qin Shi Huang died violently on the way out of the patrol, did not leave an edict to let anyone succeed to the throne, nor did he issue an order to kill Fusu, it was Hu Hai who accompanied the patrol and Zhao Gao, Li Si conspired, forged an edict to Fusu who was guarding the northern Xinjiang, Fusu committed suicide after receiving the edict, and Hu Hai succeeded to the throne.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Qin Shi Huang did not order Fusu to be killed, but the eunuch falsely passed on the holy decree, and in order for Hu Hai to ascend the throne smoothly, he designed to tamper with Qin Shi Huang's edict and kill the crown prince Fusu, who was most likely to inherit the throne.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Qin Shi Huang was the first emperor and had his own merits. He is very aware of Hu Hai's ability, for a calm emperor, he understands that if he wants Qin's Wandai must be enthroned by Gongzi Fusu, but Zhao Gao.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    First, this friend. The historical materials you know come from Sima Qian, and Sima Qian also heard about it.

    Second, the so-called conspiracy of Liss is completely his conjecture. There is no real evidence.

    Third, Gongzi Fusu is just a slogan for later generations to raise troops. The borrower is a statement.。。

    Of course, there are many reasons.

    But I think the primary reason for this is that the Qin Dynasty had no historians. This is completely what Sima Qian heard.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Politics!

    It's already very mysterious!

    It must be said that Qin Shi Huang is a talent!

    If you are if, you are if!

    If Gongzi Fusu has to be established as king!

    Most of the current people, I think, should be from the Qin people, not the current Han people!

    Qin Shi Huang's choice was right!

    But people can only expect to live, not to die!

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    If the eldest son, Fusu, had ascended the throne, China's history would have changed.

    To put it simply, Fusu is alive, and history itself has changed.

    To complicate it, if Fusu does not die, then most of the famous generals of the Qin State will not die Xiang Yu, the overlord of Chu, is no longer facing the old, weak, sick and disabled Qin army, but the iron cavalry of the Qin State of the Baiyue tribe in the Southern Expedition.

    After all, in history, after the death of Qin Shi Huang, the millions of elites of the Qin State were dominated by the Second Emperor to go south to attack Yue, and because the Second killed too many generals who were pro-Su, the Qin army that cut down Baiyue did not return to the dynasty after the victory, which weakened the strength of the Qin State.

    But the entire history of China has not changed much, after all, history is created by a group of people, not one person can change it. It is difficult to support alone, and a drop of water will not dry up until it blends into the sea.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    If Fusu does not die, China's history will not change.

    At the beginning of the Han Dynasty, there were many seminars organized by **, specifically discussing the reasons for the fall of the Qin Dynasty, some people said that it was the problem of the county system (early) that the Han Dynasty adopted the feudal system, and finally came to the conclusion that it was actually the contradiction between immediately winning the world and immediately ruling the world. For details, please refer to Jia Yi's "Treatise on the Passage of Qin".

    In the early years of the founding of the People's Republic of China, we made great efforts to govern the country, summed up the lessons of the previous dynasties, and adjusted national policies. Then the country developed, the people became rich, and the national strength reached its peak.

    But the problem is that there is no perfect system in the world, and no system can last forever without problems. The only way to avoid this phenomenon is to establish a system that will enable him to make self-corrections and adjustments (i.e., democratic institutions and political diversity), but it is precisely this kind of system that is lacking in our country, which advocates great unification. So after the heyday, it will inevitably start to go downhill.

    Then reciprocate.

    The reason why the Qin Dynasty died was not because the army was not strong enough, but because there was no experience to follow from the previous dynasty, and it was not a problem that could be solved by whoever became the emperor.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It will change in a short period of time, at most prolonging the reign of the Qin Dynasty, but the general trend of history will not change if it is divided for a long time.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    If Fusu doesn't die, Meng Tian won't die unjustly, a generation of famous generals, it's a pity! It is impossible for Han to replace Great Qin, maybe today's territory of China will be even more vast, and even the whole earth is Chinese!

Related questions
7 answers2024-07-21

Historically, Yingzheng has been in power.

He ascended to the throne of Qin at the age of 13, and was not crowned until he was 22 years old, which was actually uncourteous. >>>More

16 answers2024-07-21

During the entire period from King Qin to Qin Shi Huang, there was no time to look west. >>>More

12 answers2024-07-21

In the thinking of ancient and modern people and even today, it is believed that people will live in the two worlds of yin and yang, in the yang world when they are born, and in the underworld after death, so they pay attention to "death is like life". After death, most people will do what they can to equip the people of the underworld with daily necessities. As a greedy Qin Shi Huang, he will stop at nothing to build his underground kingdom. >>>More

8 answers2024-07-21

Qin Quanqian" - a symbol of Qin Shi Huang's unified currency Regarding the power of money, as early as the Qing Jiadao period, Dai Xi (Chunshi) recorded it in the "Guquan Conghua". Bao Kang (Zi Nian) in the Tongzhi period printed a rubbing map of power and money in his "Guan Gu Ge Spring Theory", and there was also a saying of "power and money". In 1940, Ding Fubao's "Dictionary of Ancient Coins" also contained relevant descriptions and rubbings, all of which were considered to be rare treasures in the world (the original coins contained in the book were missing). >>>More

7 answers2024-07-21

In the Zhou and Qin eras, it meant that a family was not only a symbol such as a surname, but also a clan. In fact, it is this clan that is the surname we use today, and the ancient surname has died out and has not been passed down to this day. Let's understand it this way, who we say today whose surname is Zhao, in fact, we should say that he is "Zhao" 2000 years ago. >>>More