What is the difference between a madman and a saint?

There is no essential difference between a madman and a saint, but some people are recognized and some people don't deny it, and a madman to the left can be a saint, and a saint to the right is still a madman.

The madman doesn't know how to make people understand, but the saint makes people understand!

It's actually very simple, it's just between the lines.

The difference is whether they are normal people or not: crazy people are abnormal people. Normal people have the right way of thinking to guide their personal behavior, on the contrary, crazy people are self-disciplined and act chaotically!

Generally speaking, the difference lies in whether it is the same or similar to the thinking, behavior and emotions of the vast majority of people, and whether it is compatible with the era, regional customs, and cultural background of the time. For example, in Northern Ireland, it is normal for men to wear skirts, while it is generally abnormal for Shanghai men to wear skirts on Nanjing Road in broad daylight, so it is difficult to say that it is normal.

Whether or not you can consciously control your behavior is the difference between the two.

Psychosis refers to a severe psychological disorder in which the patient's cognition, emotion, will, motor behavior and other mental activities can be manifested and persistently manifested. Unable to study, work, and live normally; Actions and behaviors are difficult to be understood by the general public; Under the control of pathological psychology, there are actions such as suicide or attacking or harming others.

To put it simply, a normal person is a person who can face himself squarely, get along with others smoothly, and be able to adapt to a normal life.

The specific situation depends on the actual situation of the patient.

1. All heroes are mortals with flesh and blood, who will be sad, hurt, and emotional, and do their best to do something meaningful without hesitation, while a saint is a person with super energy to accomplish a meaningful thing, so a hero is greater than a saint.

Heroes can conquer the world, but they can't conquer themselves, and the sages don't want to conquer the world, but conquer themselves; Heroes leave their troubles to others to pick up, and saints themselves provoke the troubles of the people of the world, right?

Maniac is a mental disorder, an emotional disorder, and uncontrolled behavior, which belongs to the disease.

A madman is just an ordinary person who is so focused on a certain aspect that he has reached the state of selflessness in disregard of his surroundings, just incomprehensible.

Generally speaking, it's the difference between being sick and not being sick.

A psychopath, if it affects one, two, ten or twenty people, then he is crazy.

A mentally ill person, if it affects 12,000, 102,000,000 people, then he is a madman.

It doesn't make a difference, it's all neuropathic ......

The classic ...... answered upstairs

One is a nervous patient and the other is an arrogant mind.

On the surface, they are all arrogant, grotesque, stubborn, and neurotic, which is unreasonable, and often attracts ridicule and ridicule; However, between a genius and a madman, there is a difference in form but quality

The former is mentally healthy; The latter is insane. The former seeks truth from facts and has many elements of self-confidence; The latter is cranky and arrogant. The former is almost not socially harmful, but it has a great possibility of bringing unimaginable benefits to human beings; The latter is feared by everyone, and destructive is always there.

The former is broad-minded, the latter narrow-minded. Before the former became a genius, he thought more for others and society; The latter, before becoming a madman, thought a little more for himself...

When others call you crazy, you can understand that others are calling you a genius; Don't be complacent when others say you're a genius, you can also understand that others are calling you a madman.

A group of mentally ill people released their inner mania on the stage, cut out their hearts and handed them over to the audience for review, this is an absurd world, ethics are broken, rules are submerged, and the stage is dominated by a group of monsters dancing weirdos.

Are geniuses and madmen the same kind of people?

The difference between a madman and a fool is that a madman is overly obsessed with studying a thing or thing, etc., but the difference between thinking logic, cognition, and memory is not much different from that of normal people, of course, except for a few people who are crazy because of cognition and memory, and fools are generally just too poor in cognition and poor memory, and others are the same as normal people, can you imagine that if a fool lives for 200 years, will he still be stupid? Even a rabbit is like a human being, right, of course, if you hack, he is locked up in a space with only one person for two hundred years, you didn't say it.

Actually, these two words are not necessarily derogatory, some workaholics, we also call them crazy, some are only for others, not for themselves, we also call them fools, whether crazy or stupid, they live according to their own ideas, work according to their goals, they live with thoughts, if you just talk about mental problems, whether you are crazy or stupid, they are very happy, because they lose their minds, they lose their ideas, they don't have ties, they don't remember, everything is good in their eyes, there is no joy

A madman is almost like a fool, and a fool can easily become a madman. No one cares about the madman in the hospital, and he becomes a madman himself in the future.

A madman has a mental problem, and a fool has an intellectual problem.

One is to look forward, the other is to look back, the other is to turn when encountering fate, and the other is to remain unchanged with fate, if you have the heart of becoming a saint, if you have the feeling of being an arhat, you will be troubled and cannot be liberated.

Buddha, a mythical story, something that doesn't exist at all. If you want to believe, believe in Jesus, because he is a real person, and his efforts are witnessed, but what did the Buddha do for us? None of them can be proven, and what is obtained is more superstition.

If you don't understand like the landlord and ask, it is different from the saint, this is called discriminating, I hope you can understand.

All roads lead to Rome, why should the landlord be obsessed with this. Thousands of methods, just go in front of you first.

Without meditation skills, the nature is just a lonely claw, only meditation skills, and the nature is gradually drifting away.

The saints have their hearts for all sentient beings, and ordinary people think of themselves.

If you say it bluntly, just three words: don't be distracted.

If a person drinks water, he knows whether he is warm or cold.

Jingyun: The law is equal, and there is no superiority.

in the law of equality. I don't see ordinary people who are different from saints.

Knowing from the heart and seeing from the nature is the Buddha. Why cling to the law?

Enlightenment is a saint, and delusion is an ordinary man.

The realm of ordinary people is "always burning" is the French rebuke of the Buddha, because there is no holy way, so it seems to be always burning in the fire.

The Diamond Sutra says: "If you don't live in the color and in the heart, and if you don't stop the sound, fragrance, and touch the Dharma, you should give birth to the heart without dwelling." "If you can have this state, you will jump out of the fire and be free.

In fact, the mind is all active in the touches of color, sound, fragrance, and the Dharma, and it is either greed or hatred, or it is stupidity, evil knowledge, or doubt, or it is high and slow, and all kinds of false distinctions. This is the inner realm of ordinary people.

In the realm of saints, "all their leaks" are afflictions, and these arhats practice the four thoughts to eliminate the fundamental attachment to love and see afflictions.

When you encounter lovely causes, you are not greedy, and when you meet hateful causes, you are not angry, so you can gradually attain the holy path, because in order to attain the holy path, one must be able to get rid of the attachment that was before initiating greed and hatred, and only with the clarity of prajna can one become a saint.

What exactly is the relationship between genius and madness?

Those who succeed and achieve achievements are called geniuses, and those who have not succeeded or achieved zhi are called mad daos

Genius before it succeeded, and most of the time people thought that he was crazy, like Albert Einstein, who proposed a theory of relativity that was so avant-garde, not to mention ordinary people, that even scientists at the time disagreed with a lot, but it was true.

And then there's poets, painters, and I'm not talking nonsense, but you can look up their biographies and biographies, and some of their behaviors are like crazy people in the eyes of ordinary people.

For example, Van Gogh cut off his ears in order to paint a self-portrait of himself. Wait a minute.

3 4 people have the baidarpp-32 gene, which controls both geniuses and madmen, so so.

Zhi's genius is crazy.

But why aren't madmen geniuses? ·· I think that if Einstein had been discovered by the Neurological Hospital, then there would have been no relativity of the atomic bomb in the world.

Genius has the tendency to be mad, and madman has the potential to be a genius.

Most geniuses are able to concentrate on a certain version of the work, and perseverance until success, so most of them are regarded as crazy.

Most madmen can only pour their minds into the things they are interested in in front of them, persevere, and eventually get something, so most of them can achieve something.

Do you mean Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche?

Genius is good for society, while madness is only harmful.

People need him to believe that he is a genius, and he is a madman who is disgusted