Why is it that people who usually look okay are so ugly when they take pictures, and their faces are

People who usually look okay will be ugly after a shot, some people are more photogenic, some people are not photogenic, and some people are more good-looking, and their faces are thinner and thin. But she doesn't look good when she takes pictures, some of her faces are chubby, but she takes pictures very beautifully.

Because she usually looks at people who are okay, she is dynamic, and the face curve is not on the camera, the people under the lens will be fatter than visually, so the celebrities' control of the body will be so strict, a little fatter, the camera will give people a very fat feeling.

Usually look at people who are okay, when taking pictures, it is very time, it should be that the effect of taking pictures is not very good, not like.

Because some people are not photogenic, even if they are usually good-looking, after taking pictures or taking **, their faces will not look good, especially many people with three-dimensional faces will have this problem.

Many people are not actually photogenic, but they actually look good-looking, and they don't even look the same in the mirror. Many people actually look the same way themselves, look in the mirror, look at the ** as a look, and look the same when taking pictures.

I think the effect of taking a photo is always different from what it actually looks like, and some people just look good in normal times, but when they take a photo, they are not photogenic.

Why is it okay to look at people usually, but the photos taken are so ugly. The face is distorted. One is that the angle of the person taking the picture is not taken well. The second is that he is not suitable for photography. Born to photograph doesn't match.

Some people usually look okay, but when they take a picture, they are very ugly, and their faces are distorted, and some people usually look okay, but they don't take pictures, and they don't look as good as themselves.

Usually a person who looks okay is ugly when he takes a photo, and his face is distorted, because he is not photogenic and can't pose, and when he is photographed, his movements are distorted.

Some people are more photogenic, and the photo effect will be better than that of a real person, but some people who are not photogenic will not be as good-looking as a real person, and it is normal to look fatter and distorted when taking pictures.

Usually it's okay to look at people, but it's so ugly when you take a picture, I think it's a problem with your photography skills.

That's because the person who took the picture is not good at taking pictures, and a person with good photography skills can make a very ugly person look beautiful, and a person with poor photography skills can make a beautiful person very ugly.

I think if you care a lot, practice more angles, light, distance, and let experienced people teach you!

There are many reasons, some are because the photography technology is not good, some are because the expression management is not in place when taking pictures, it is more stiff, and it is more likely that it is not on the photo, which is the most common, this is the case for me, so, I am usually afraid of taking pictures, I hope mine will satisfy you, thank you!

I think there are some people who don't take pictures, they don't know how to pose and don't know how to look good, so they don't look good when they come out.

Take pictures to see a certain angle, many people choose the angle of photography when they are on camera, you let others take pictures, or go to a place where you take pictures.

Hello, some people are more photogenic, some people are less photogenic, and the technical skills of shooting are also very different.

The posture is not right, the camera angle is wrong. Look in the mirror and pose for what feels best. Find the light.

It's either that I don't take pictures, or I can't pose, or the person taking pictures is not skilled.

The first possibility is that the beauty camera is turned on too much, and the second reason is that it is not photogenic.

The angle of the photo is very important, otherwise the person will not look good.

This is called not being photogenic.

It's not suitable for taking pictures.

In daily life, you will find an interesting phenomenon, some people do look good in reality, white skin and beautiful appearance, big eyes and high nose bridge, no matter how you look at it, you are handsome, no matter how you look at it, it is beautiful, but the photography is not good-looking. Real people are far better looking than people in photos. Today, I will talk to you about why some people look good in reality, but they don't look good in photography?

Whether it is ordinary people who are troubled by this, and some celebrities are also like this, the real people in real life are very beautiful and handsome, and the proportion of facial features is also good, but hard photos can't be played, and the ** taken is not good-looking, and there is a difference of 108,000 miles from the real person. This is actually what people often say about not being photogenic.

There are four main features of an unphotogenic face, if there are only one or two of them, then the photographed ** can still be seen, if most of the features are there, then the photographed ** will basically be called a "disaster". First of all, the face is relatively large, and the mandible.

Wide. This kind of person is not photogenic. If the face is larger, the mandible is wide and the cheekbones are high.

The self in ** will look very big, and the shooting ** is far less than that of a real person.

Second, the facial features are not three-dimensional or concentrated. If you look closely, you'll see that Westerners are a little more photogenic than Easterners, due to their more three-dimensional faces, deep eye sockets, high nose bridge, and brow bones.

high, the facial features are also relatively several, and there will be no too scattered phenomenon. On the contrary, the eye socket is not deep, the bridge of the nose is not straight, and the mouth is convex or concave. Even in private, it looks okay, and even beautiful, but all kinds of shortcomings will be exposed.

The third is the so-called bad bone physiognomy, that is, the side face cannot reach the four high and three low. The four heights refer to: the forehead should be high, the tip of the nose should be high, the lip bed should be high, and the tip of the chin should be high; The three lows refer to:

The area where the forehead meets the nose should be low, the philtrum should be low, and the lower lip should be lower. People who meet the four highs and three lows may not be particularly brilliant in reality, but they are often particularly photogenic, and the ** shot is superior to me. On the contrary, people who do not have four highs and three lows are often not on camera, and the ** of the shooting is inferior.

The distance between the fourth eyebrows and eyes is too wide and not deep enough, and this kind of person is often not photogenic, and the ** shot is more ugly than the real person. Take a closer look at those good stars who take hard photos, such as Yi Yang Qianxi.

Liu Wen, Ni Ni.

The distance from their eyebrows to their eyes is relatively close, and their eyebrows and eyes are particularly deep, and they look particularly good when photographed. In the same way, if the eyebrows are too wide, you will not be photogenic.

To sum up, many people in life are very beautiful and handsome in reality, but the ** shot is not satisfactory, not because you are ugly, but because your face is not photogenic. The proportion of your facial features is more or less not very good, the distance between your eyebrows and eyes may be too large, and in front of the camera, these small flaws of yours are magnified, so ** does not look as good as a real person.

It may be that some people don't take pictures, but some people look good in photos, and they are ugly when you see me.