Why didn t the ancient Chinese government pay attention to technology?

In the eyes of everyone, science and technology belonged to the work of businessmen, and was despised by dignitaries and nobles, so naturally no one would pay attention to it. And migrant workers have difficulty making ends meet, let alone engaging in science and technology.

In ancient China, the government did not attach importance to science and technology, because it was mainly based on agriculture, and the state attached great importance to agriculture.

The reason why the ancient Chinese government did not pay attention to science and technology was mainly because the ruler at that time wanted to rule for himself, and at the same time he wanted to restrain people's minds, which was conducive to the ruler's rule.

Ancient Chinese science and technology have had a significant impact on the world and have made significant contributions to the world's science and technology. Therefore, there is no such thing as an ancient Chinese government that did not pay attention to science and technology.

In ancient times, people were generally more superstitious, and then they liked ghosts and gods, and they didn't believe in science and technology, and they didn't think about developing science and technology when they were self-sufficient.

In ancient China, the government did not attach importance to science and technology because people's thinking at that time was not advanced, and people's thinking of valuing business and suppressing agriculture was relatively serious.

1. The scientific and technological content mainly focuses on agriculture-related agronomy, astronomical calendar and medicine, etc., with strong applicability, but the exploration of the development law of things is insufficient; In terms of research methods, it is mainly the collation of traditional classics, such as experience summarization, and lack of experiments; Attach importance to summarizing practical experience, and despise theoretical generalization and abstraction.

2. In the use of science and technology, it mainly serves the development of feudal agricultural economy and the needs of large-scale projects, and lacks the motivation and awareness to effectively transform science and technology into productive forces and become the further development of science and technology.

3. Pay attention to the exploration of social and humanistic issues, pay attention to the unity of nature and man, respect nature, and attach importance to improving the relationship between man and nature.

To be precise, ancient China was underdeveloped in science, but technology was not bad, which was also a common problem of most ancient civilizations.

Because the so-called "science" is a complete and self-consistent system, based on the law of the operation of all things in the world, and advocates a skeptical attitude towards everything that has not been proven. However, the ancient Chinese scholars, represented by Confucianism, believed that sages were born to know and could not make mistakes at all. They believe that the third generation of Xia Shang and even more ancient times is the almost perfect ** prosperous era, and what they pursue is retro.

It is impossible for these ideas to give birth to a modern scientific system.

On the contrary, some genius craftsmen have a flash of inspiration and will invent a certain technology and process, but they have no guidance and summary of scientific thought, and cannot rise to the height of theory.

First, the treatment of craftsmen was very low, in those days, there was no real estate will be ridiculed, and modern people do not have a house at the age of 40, and many craftsmen have money to buy land instead of engaging in scientific research.

Second, there is no special scientific research in China, even now, have you seen a bunch of Olympiad champions, but has there ever been an Einstein? Although science is popular now, the more popular industries are all engineering, and not many people study science. What use do you say about the theory of relativity?

How much money can I earn? You said that the theory of relativity can be applied to nuclear energy technology in the future, then I will invest directly in nuclear power plants.

Third, due to the small-scale peasant economy for thousands of years, it is very difficult to disseminate technology, and some research is regarded as family heirlooms and not publicized to the public, and many superb technologies are slowly lost.

Fourth, it is still a small-scale peasant economy, and China's science and technology are all related to agricultural production, focusing on practice and ignoring theoretical research.

There are also reasons why it is due to the ancient Chinese concept that some things are called useless learning.

It's not that it can't be explained, but because there is a lack of records left in ancient times to corroborate, modern people don't know whether the method of restoration is correct.

In addition, modern society does not invest much energy in reproducing ancient technology, and many ancient technology research and reproduction are carried out by civil groups or even individuals, and the state or chaebol does not participate in these things at all, and the human and financial resources are insufficient, so of course it is difficult to reproduce.

Because some techniques or methods have been lost in ancient times, it is normal that they cannot be explained until now, and it may be that the technology at that time was relatively sophisticated.

Because some ancient technologies in ancient times are indeed more tricky, and the interval is a bit long, some technical methods have long been lost, and it is difficult to verify.

This shows that it is not that we could not invent science and technology in ancient times, but that we did not develop it, such as Mozi's organ bird, which can fly without power, how can human wisdom understand this level now.

It is true that modern science and technology have made a lot of progress, but the wisdom of the ancient people cannot be ignored.

After all, we are standing on the shoulders of the ancients to further develop technology, and we naturally cannot explain some ancient technologies that have not been thoroughly studied.

This is very normal, all the achievements we have made now are nothing more than standing on the shoulders of our predecessors, and there are many skills in ancient times that we are still amazed by in modern times.

Modern technology is also in development and cannot explain everything, and some ancient technologies have not been fully studied by modern times.

Let's stand from a different angle, there are many things in ancient times that science can't explain clearly, and ancient technology has not been thoroughly studied so far.

This is well documented, for example, the construction of pyramids in Egypt is a problem that cannot be explained by current technology.

Why can't some ancient technologies and modern technologies explain them? Today I know it.

We know that the level of modern technology is much higher than that of ancient times. So, why can't some ancient technologies and modern technologies explain them?

First of all, there is the question of research intensity. Scientific and technological inventions pay attention to innovation. The purpose of human invention of science is to facilitate life and transform life, in fact, to put it bluntly, scientific invention pays more attention to practicality.

And many ancient technologies, although they look magical, are of no value if they are really studied. It may be that when conducting scientific research, it requires a lot of costs, and these cost investments cannot solve practical problems, so there are many ancient technologies that have not been scientifically explained until now.

For example, many ancient production technologies, at that time it was an agricultural civilization, and the ancients invented a lot of magical production tools, but they were only recorded in the history books, and did not retain the physical objects. In fact, according to the current level of scientific research, it is possible to create its research, but now is the industrial age, or has already taken a step towards the age of science and technology, no one will want to go backwards and invest energy and money in this area. It is precisely because of the lack of research efforts that many ancient technologies have not been discovered.

Secondly, there is the issue of technology inheritance. When we watch martial arts, we often see that some martial arts sects have the rule of "single transmission" or "passing on men but not women", because they are not widely spread, so many martial arts are slowly lost. The same is true of many techniques in ancient times, such as medical skills and the like, there were many famous doctors in ancient times, but there are almost no who have really passed down the essence of Chinese medicine.

There are many historical documents that record those ancient techniques, but perhaps because of the language habits of the ancients, many of them are finished in a few strokes, and the process and details of the technology are not recorded. Because the technical records are incomplete, it is impossible to grasp the research of modern science and technology. Many times, it may not be difficult to study something, but to study something that is not recorded is like facing a myth, and there is no clue at all.

Then, there's the issue of technology blurring. It is undeniable that there were many magical technologies in ancient times, and these technologies have greatly promoted the development of production technology. But there are also some techniques and tools that have been deified, and they may not exist, but they have been passed on by some people for various purposes.

At that time, it was inconvenient for people to exchange information, and there was no spirit of questioning, so they believed it without seeing it with their own eyes. Then the technique was passed down orally, but few people actually saw it. So this kind of technology, modern technology can't explain it.

It's just a misunderstanding, there is nothing that ancient technology can't explain, it's not mysterious, it's just to see if enough technical resources are used to explain and study.