What kind of philosophical enlightenment does the story of the Chu people crossing the river bring u

The crossing of the river by the Chu people is a fable.

The content of its story is like this: During the Warring States Period, the monarch of the Chu State.

He was very ambitious and wanted to dominate the world and achieve unification, so he often sent troops to attack other countries. And the state of Chu and the state of Song.

There is a very wide and deep river between them, called the Yongshui River, once the Chu State wanted to sneak attack the Song State, so he secretly sent people to measure the depth of the Yongshui River and mark it, planning to smuggle across the river in the middle of the night to attack the Song State. But the sky was not beautiful, it happened to rain heavily that night, the water of the Yongshui River rose sharply, and the depth also changed, and the ridiculous thing is that the people of Chu did not take this unexpected factor into account at all, but crossed the river directly in the middle of the night according to the original measurement mark, and more than a thousand soldiers were drowned. This frightened the people of Chu, because they didn't take into account that the heavy rain would rise and the river could have been crossed, but now it has failed.

This story tells us that everything in the world is changing all the time, and there is a good saying, "the plan can never catch up with the change", so we must know how to change with the trend and change the plan according to the actual situation, rather than rigidly implementing the original plan, which leads to the failure of the whole event. From a philosophical point of view, behind this story is the principle of the concept of development. The world is eternally developing, and development is universal, just like the story of the Chu people crossing the river, not only people, but even the river is also developing, and the water will rise when it encounters heavy rain.

Therefore, we must recognize the nature of the development of things, use them rationally, and fully take into account the factors of development in the actual plan. I think if the Chu people had taken into account the weather and given up crossing the river after heavy rain or re-measured the depth of the river, then this accident would not have happened.

So this story is to tell us that everything in the world is changing and developing, and we should follow the trend of development, fully consider various factors, and make timely adjustments and changes to the plan, so as to achieve success.

The philosophical enlightenment brought to us by this story is that nature is constantly changing, there is no fixed way for anything, we must consider the consequences of doing things, do not blindly implement them, we must know how to change with the situation.

Do everything to be thoughtful, don't be too anxious, understand the changes in the outside world, and learn to take advantage of the situation.

You must pay attention to the surrounding environment, so that you can do it better, and you need to better protect yourself to avoid serious problems that affect your follow-up.

<>1. The crossing of the river by the Chu people tells us that the situation is constantly changing, and people's understanding should also change with the development and change of the objective situation. People must always take corresponding measures according to the new situation, otherwise they will suffer losses and fall. The river rises and falls, constantly changing, and the understanding of the Chu people should also change with it, but the stagnation of their thinking led to the final fiasco.

Li Hong. 2. The story satirizes those who are conformist, stubborn, inflexible, stubborn, and do not know how to take flexible countermeasures according to objective reality.

This story tells us that things in the world are always developing and changing, and people should take into account this change and adapt to the needs of this change when thinking about problems and doing things. Later, people often used this idiom to satirize people who are stubborn, inflexible, and conformist.