What did primitive man look like without clothes

The history of the class is about 3 million years.

When did hominids start wearing clothes? It's hard to tell.

Before there was writing, the answer could only be obtained by word of mouth, that is, in the story of legends.

In my country, the story of the famous "Cowherd and Weaver Girl" is an example.

The story of "The Cowherd and the Weaver Girl", retrospectively, took place in the era of Vega, gradually improved through generations, and has been passed down to this day.

The Vega era was the era of group marriages of matriarchal tribes 12,000 years ago. The Cowherd and the Weaver Girl fell in love with each other, trying to break through the shackles of traditional concepts, establish a fixed marriage, and start a family, but were punished by the tribal leader, but failed. The story shows from another angle that during the Vega era, clothes began to be woven for wearing (instead of covering the body with leaves), although rough, but after all, clothes.

As for geology, archaeology, there is no material yet on when hominids began to wear clothes.

No, because people in that era were like that, and it became natural to get used to it. Besides, there were no clothes in those days, no aesthetics without clothing, no aesthetics, no shyness.

No, because at that time the human mind did not evolve to that time.

There is a process of change, with continuous evolution, from the beginning of not understanding, not knowing, to the continuous change of life and culture, will you know what shyness is? Just like children don't be shy when they're young, girls and boys are **adults ask: children, be ashamed ......As you talk, people grow up, and when you see people around you wearing clothes, you naturally know what shyness is.

It's kind of driven by your surroundings, isn't it? In ancient times, the brain at the beginning would not be as developed as that of modern people, but there was an evolutionary process. So, the conclusion is that I didn't know it at the time, and then I evolved to think a lot more, so I naturally became shy, and there were many other ways of thinking.

That's my idea, it doesn't matter if it's right or not, it makes some sense, doesn't it?

No, because at that time, **clothes were a common thing, and I didn't know what a shy ...... wasIt will slowly become a habit in this era, and wearing clothes has become a habit of people's sheds. Hope you will be satisfied with this answer

No. Because people are ** clothes, but if you wear clothes, you will be shy.

Probably not, because everyone is the same, if everyone ** then it's nothing, and now you** clothes will be shy because everyone wears them.

I don't think so. Because there were probably no clothes at that time, for them, clothes were only used for warmth. And at that time, they probably didn't know what shyness was. What does it mean to be shy. So it won't.

Trouble, thanks!

No, it's the same for everyone.

Satisfied. Primitive people are like rudimentary primates, and monkeys don't all cover a piece of cloth, right?

Primitive people wear things mainly to keep out the cold, and they don't think so much, because they don't feel shy without that condition and thinking ability, and some primitive tribes are like this now.

Primitive people wore different clothes in different periods, including leaves, animal skins, and so on.

Primitive people did not have the weaving technology, and they should have worn clothes made of animal skins or leaves.

You know when the human race began.

Dressed in clothes? British scientists recently dao

From the study of lice, it has been found that the history of human rights to dress can be traced back to about 10,000 years ago. This is the first hypothesis in the academic world about the origin of clothing to date.

Through the use of genetic research methods, Professor Mark Stonekin of the Max Planck Institute for Human Evolution in the United Kingdom cleverly used the influence of clothing on the evolution of lice, and deduced the origin of clothing.

At present, the oldest specimen of clothing in the world is a fragment of ancient Egyptian linen that has been handed down before 5,000 BC. Because clothing cannot be fossilized, scientists cannot conclude that it is the most primitive form of human clothing. However, Professor Stonekin and his research team have taken inspiration from another ancient and common thing, lice, and for the first time revealed the "indissoluble bond" between humans and lice on another level.

Writing in Current Biology, Stonekin et al. point out that there are two types of lice – those on the head and those on the body. The former was born earlier and generally lives on the human scalp. However, as the ancients gradually became accustomed to clothing and shelter, the lice on the scalp began to shift to clothing, and eventually evolved into the latter.

By studying the differences in the genes between the two, it can be determined that the age of this evolutionary process took place, which is the time when humans began to wear clothes – about 10,000 years ago.

At that time, there were still rice clothes, only tree bark, grass and the like.

After understanding the difference between men and women. If you don't understand, you won't be shy, just like the current bathhouse, why wear clothes, when you understand the difference between men and women, it's different, and if you understand shyness, you have to think of a solution, so you start wearing clothes.