Watches are not a necessity of life now, but only rich people bring watches, do you agree?

After years of development, the watch has evolved from the original quartz three-hand chronograph to the current multi-functional compound; There are perpetual calendars, moon phases, minute repeaters, tourbillons, etc.; It is not only a simple timekeeping instrument, but also a high-tech handicraft and work of art. or a piece of jewelry or ornament; And watches play an important role in different application environments.

<> mobile phone is so convenient, why do the professional elite and the rich wear watches? The watch can be used to see the time; People who often sit in a car or drive know that it is inconvenient and unsafe to look at their mobile phones, especially when crossing the street, many people stare at their mobile phones; And the watch can get the time faster, which is much more convenient. On some important occasions or meetings, don't look at your phone repeatedly, it's more natural and polite to look at your watch.

Wearing gold and silver or bringing a watch or something, this is actually different from people being liked, don't have an absolute relationship with rich people! It can only be said that it is relative, now I always feel that wearing a gold chain or something makes people feel very tacky, and wearing a watch seems to be a little more cultured, so now men carry more watches, but not everyone brings Rolex or Patek Philippe luxury watches, maybe most of us have to bring 10,000 or thousands or even hundreds of watches, it can't be said that it must be rich, it's just a little more decoration. Forget about it.

Watches, Chu or something's auction, the maximum limit, generally millions or hundreds, ordinary people say good watches, that is, more than a dozen to dozens. It's the same with cars, except for Bugatti, which is a luxury car defined by ordinary people, that is, one million, and a little higher, two or three hundred. This **, if these things are for the working class, it is nonsense, in fact, it is not something to show off in the rich area.

Do a detailed explanation of the problem for a detailed interpretation of the problem, I hope it will help you, if there are any questions, you can leave me a message in the comment area, you can comment with me more, if there is something wrong, you can also interact with me more, if you like the author, you can also follow me, the like is the biggest help to me, thank you.

I don't agree with this point of view, watches are still needed in large exams, and people with a better sense of time will also wear watches for a long time, which is not a symbol of wealth.

I very much agree, because the watch is to show a person's identity, and now a better watch ** is more expensive.

It cannot be said that rich people like to wear watches, but it should be said that people who want to show their strength like to wear watches. Since the chronograph function of the watch has been weakened, it is mainly the decorative function and some value preservation functions at present. Therefore, people who have the above ideas have the need to wear watches.

Of course, this does not include those who have a fanatical penchant for precision machinery, which has nothing to do with whether they have money or not. Although some people say that people who really have no money can afford to wear ** and can afford to wear jewelry, but anyone who can afford to wear ** will not be without money, they are all rich people. However, in real life, it is undeniable that I have indeed seen many people who can't afford to eat and still have a gold chain around their necks, and there are indeed people who wear gold bracelets of 10,000 or 20,000 yuan, but there are only a few hundred yuan left in their accounts.

Of course, we can't say that such a person must be vain, no matter what kind of person he is, he has the right to love beauty and the freedom to pursue beauty. Then the rich must not wear **? Actually, it's not, at least I've seen a lot of rich young ladies who still wear **.

It's just that they usually wear colored gold, such as a very thin 18k gold chain, and a thin colored gold ring with diamonds. Many people will say that most of those are Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpels, Bulgari and the like. It is not denied that it will be these luxury brands, but aside from the brand, the essence of those jewelry is indeed a lottery.

So it can't be said that there is no money to wear **, in case of those ** jewelry, one is hundreds of thousands.