The annual meeting of employees won a suite, and the boss regretted it? What is the truth of this

The truth of this matter is actually that the employee is wrong, not because the boss is wrong, because the employee did not win a suite, but only won an award for emptying the shopping cart, but when the boss was about to empty the shopping cart for him, the boss saw that there was a house in his shopping cart, which was too much. Therefore, although the boss did not fully fulfill his promise, if we analyze it with moral and ordinary people's thinking, it is indeed the employee's problem, not the boss's problem. Because a house is expensive, even a small place is worth hundreds of thousands, and the boss can't take hundreds of thousands to reward an employee, because it is completely out of his expectation and budget.

This thing is like this, because we are about to go to the Spring Festival holiday, and under normal circumstances, before the Spring Festival holiday, major companies will hold some annual meetings, so that the company's employees can repay, but also a kind of encouragement and relaxation for employees, in this process, there will also be a review of some work in previous years, as well as the outlook for the next year's work, it can be said that it is very festive and very united on this occasion, because this kind of annual meeting will generally hold a kind of **activity, and** The level of rewards will vary depending on the basic situation of each company, but this time there is one company that has come up with a prize because of his ingenuity.

And this prize is more because the boss thinks that if he prepares gifts for employees himself, then employees may not like what he prepares, so he sets the first prize as "emptying the shopping cart". Because this is also a great risk to the boss, although the prize is very attractive, if the employee puts some very expensive things in it, such as tens of thousands of bags for hundreds of thousands of cars, millions of houses, then how can the boss really empty it? As a result, it really happened, after a male employee of their company won the first prize, it stands to reason that the boss must help him empty the shopping cart immediately, but when the boss sees the contents of a shopping cart, the boss regrets it on the spot, because the employee's shopping cart has a house in it.

Faced with this situation, the boss suddenly became in a dilemma, because if he retreated, he would subvert his previous promise, and if he entered, it was indeed impossible to take out so much money as a reward at once, so the boss did not completely refuse to empty his shopping cart, but it was impossible to pay him the full amount, and then he discussed with the employee that he could help the employee pay the deposit for this suite. In fact, this is also because the boss's policy has not been adjusted well, in fact, he can set a limit of how much money, everyone can understand.

The employee put a Country Garden room in his shopping cart. The boss said that the whole company couldn't afford to buy the house, so he regretted it. Then Xiao Wang felt that the boss was very discredited, and the boss said that he could only afford the deposit, and there was really no way to pay the other money.

I think the boss should set a ceiling and a minimum amount for the award, so that both parties are not embarrassed and everyone can be happy.

I definitely regretted it, but I still paid the deposit for the house later. Recently, Xiao Wang, an employee of a company in Hangzhou, asked for help and said that the boss promised the winner of the first prize of the annual meeting that the company would help "empty the shopping cart", and he won the first prize, because the shopping cart was a suite, and the boss refused to help "empty". Xiao Wang felt that the company was "discredited", and the boss Mr. Li reluctantly said that Xiao Wang was a bit "excessive", which was to "pay for him by the whole company", but in the end he still paid the deposit for the house.

The boss doesn't regret it, he can't afford to pay the full amount, the thing is actually like this, there is a company holding an annual meeting, the winner can let the boss empty the shopping cart for him, and the employee just won the lottery, his shopping cart is a suite, the boss said he can't afford to pay, let him change it, or only pay the deposit for the house, but the employee does not agree, this matter is still being negotiated.

The truth of the matter is that the employee really has a house in his shopping cart, and the boss regrets it, saying that he will only pay the deposit for this house.

The truth is that the employee** was awarded for emptying the shopping cart, but the employee put a house in the cart, and the boss regretted it.

Xiao Wang, an employee of a company in Hangzhou, recently felt very "wronged", and the company promised that the annual meeting award was "emptying the shopping cart", but when he won the lottery, the boss regretted ......It turned out that Xiao Wang put a suite in the "shopping cart" The boss said that the company did not consider setting rewards, but a suite was indeed "beyond the scope of the company's bearing". Xiao Wang thought that the company was "untrustworthy", and finally the boss agreed to pay the deposit for the house.

Later, the boss and the employee also communicated to a certain extent, saying that it was this kind of ** activity, I really didn't expect you to be able to add a suite in it, the value is too high, it has exceeded the company's normal budget, but considering the authenticity of the annual meeting** activity, the company is willing to pay the down payment for this employee, and other mortgage employees will repay it by themselves, I personally feel that this boss has been very benevolent, and you meet the kind of boss who turns his face and does not recognize people, and then he will not give you a clear,What can you do? Has the company's annual meeting been notarized, saying that employees must get this thing after the draw.

If there is such an activity in the annual meeting, you have to consult the company in advance, what prizes may be launched, and the shopping cart should be added, but you don't go too far, if you touch the rationality of the boss, the boss will not deal with you at that time, and you have no way, so stop it when appropriate, you have tens of thousands of dollars or hundreds of thousands of things in the shopping cart, and the boss will also give you the promise of such a big family businessBut you have millions of tens of millions of houses, and the boss really can't fulfill this promise for you, and it won't be worth it if you don't have anything left at that time.

I think that in the annual meeting, the boss of a suite repented, and the boss's operation was irresponsible for what he said.

Regarding the repentance of the owner of a house in the annual meeting, I think the boss's operation is irresponsible for his own words. Because in our daily lives, the boss is responsible for what he does, and if they promise someone to empty the shopping cart, they will definitely have to pay for it in the following days. After all, it is a big company, and if they cheat employees in their daily life, they will definitely make them distrust the company in their daily life.

The boss's operation must be to keep his funds from being lost, and only in this way can the company develop better in the coming days.

I hope that in the coming days, the boss will be able to correct his own operations, and only in this way can his employees trust their company more.

It's originally a picture with a reward.,If you want to play like this, add a few luxury cars.,Diamond** or something.。 Is there a legal definition for "emptying the cart"? Is the nature of annual meeting awards regulated and protected by law?

If you don't have it, it's a play on words, and if you delete it all, it's also called "emptying".

This wave of operations made people feel very helpless and sad, after all, the boss actually agreed, and he would regret it.

Very speechless. It is estimated that the owner of this suite has made a decision, but it was drawn by the staff.

The boss's behavior is also a serious offense, and it deceives the feelings of these employees, and it can also make them disinterested in their work.

Employees have moral problems, and the boss has good intentions, but you can't hack others like this! I also got a house of several millions, and the boss's money didn't come from the wind! In the face of such a person, delete the shopping cart directly for him, this is not empty.

I think maybe the boss was too naïve, I didn't expect that there was a suite in the employee's shopping cart, which had greatly exceeded the prize limit!

If you don't want to cash in, don't get this award, so as not to chill employees and bring credibility to your own business. Moreover, if the boss does this, it will also affect the loyalty of employees to the company.

I think this employee is really too much, this kind of person who likes to use chicken feathers as an arrow, likes to go on the platform, I think it's quite outrageous, the boss was originally well-intentioned, what does it mean that he put a suite in the shopping cart.

Therefore, it shows that the boss pattern is very small, and the mind is also very narrow-minded, and this approach will make employees feel particularly cold, and if they can't afford it, don't talk about it.

I think the boss should not go back, after all, you are the promiser, since you have promised, you can't easily go back, you should establish absolute authority in the hearts of employees, so that employees are convinced.

This boss obviously can't afford to play, our unit annual meeting someone won a Golf and a Phaeton, the boss here directly handed over the keys on the spot, during the annual meeting ** There are a lot of Apple mobile phones, the boss has sent it directly, and I feel that I can't afford to send it, and it also affects the company's atmosphere, employee trust and cohesion.

As a boss, you should do what you say, how can you choose to regret it because the prize is too big, and seriously condemn the boss.

The question of the theme of the building should be the news: the boss gave help to empty the shopping cart, and the man added a house to the shopping cart, right?

If you dare to say it, you dare to do it. One says without an upper limit, and the other does it without a bottom line.

There are no wonders about the size of the world. The boss is now heartbroken.

Employees can negotiate with the boss, if they do not agree, they need to go through legal procedures to protect their rights and interests, and winning the lottery at the annual meeting is the welfare that the boss promises to give to employees, and it is the treatment that employees should enjoy. It is a violation for the boss to repent.

Employees should consult with the boss and come up with evidence to ask the boss to keep his promises, and if he can't keep his word, he can find the police and help mediate.

If the boss doesn't keep his promise, what can the employee do, but if I were this employee, maybe I wouldn't continue to work in this unit because this boss doesn't speak honestly.

Employees can sue their bosses. Because he didn't talk enough, he deceived the employees, and the law was able to solve the problem.

You can defend your rights through legal means, and it should be useless to win a suite, and the boss regrets it.

Employees must choose to protect their rights and apply to the labor arbitration department for cash, so as to protect their legitimate rights and interests.

This situation can be reported to the relevant departments, but the most important thing depends on whether your boss only verbally agreed or has evidence at that time.

Employees should report the situation to the relevant departments in a timely manner and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests.

Communicate and solve it first, if the communication fails, sue directly, and let the law help solve it.

The annual meeting of employees draws a suite of owners to repentThe boss's repentance is logically unreasonableFor the boss, you need to comply with the provisions of these benefits for employees, but for employees, it can't be too much, some employees do know that the boss will pay benefits, so he knows to empty the shopping cart, he joins a suite, but for the boss, if you are normal This kind of shopping cart contents, the boss will definitely empty it for you, but for such employees, it is actually unreasonable, And for the boss, he may not have thought that his split employee would do this, which is for two reasons, on the one hand, the employee himself did not put himself in the position of an employee at all, and he himself wanted to be greedy for cheap, and wanted to let himself buy a relatively large object.

For the boss, he didn't think that the employee would do this, maybe he would add some other things to the sky, but it was impossible to think that he would add a house to his shopping cart, in this case the boss to pay or not to pay is a problem, for the boss is actually unreasonable, and it is very uncomfortable, in this case, the boss is not able to pay, or the boss does not want to pay at all, he just wants to empty the employee's shopping cart normally.

But the employee's approach is actually more so that the boss can't get off the stage, for the employee, each of them may have something in the shopping cart, just add to the shopping cart and want to buy but dare not buy, not so much ability to buy things, but for the boss to empty the shopping cart, they add a lot of themselves to it, originally can be bought, but can't afford to buy things at all, in this case, it belongs to a state of the pit boss, So the boss is definitely not willing to empty his shopping cart.

This kind of thing is actually a state of conscience for each of us, if this person is to covet this little bit of cheap or want to do this, in fact, it is not particularly good for him, especially if he still needs to work in this place in the future, if he does not need to work in this place, then it doesn't matter, but if he still needs to work in this place, then what will the boss think, he may not do this for people who have points in his heart, But this person's words definitely didn't expect that he would win the lottery, nor did he think that the boss would talk or not, these are all problems that we didn't expect, and the boss repented of winning a suite at the annual meeting of employeesThe boss's repentance is logically unreasonable