What kind of controversy did Gucci s Year of the Tiger campaign sparked with a real tiger?

Because tigers are endangered animals and are protected animals in our country. Therefore, the use of real tiger filming has made people in the Animal Protection Association worry that someone will carry out illegal ** on the tiger, which will cause controversy.

Triggered this tiger, will it bite in the end? Will it hurt the controversy of the model? I think this controversy is quite good.

Recently, Gucci has been controversial because of its use of real tigers in advertising, and many netizens are asking Gucci: "Why not use fake tigers?" "In fact, the effect of the fake tiger is absolutely bad, rather than using the fake tiger to use the cutout to add the tiger to the advertisement, but Gucci itself is a luxury brand, in terms of advertising is relatively strict, Gucci also believes that the use of real tigers can highlight the style of the brand, so the choice of real tigers to join the advertisement, if not considering other factors, Gucci's advertising is indeed very good.

First of all, many people may not know enough about luxury brands, in fact, not only luxury brands, many high-end brands have very high advertising requirements, such as Apple, Casarte, etc., these brands are the same as Gucci, have unique insights into advertising, so when we see the advertisements of Apple, Gucci and other brands, we can immediately find that this advertisement is high-end, and it is different from other brands, this is because different brands pursue different textures, These big brands are all looking for high-end and authentic textures.

Secondly, there is a word in Chinese called Shenglong Huohu, which tells about the impact of truth and agility, and shooting advertisements is actually the same, the advertisements shot by fake models are like a pool of stagnant water, and the advertisements shot by smart models seem to be smart, which is also the fundamental reason why Gucci insists on using real tigers, fake tigers cannot bring vivid impact to the audience at all, so the scheme of fake tigers is definitely not Gucci.

Finally, although everyone is complaining about Gucci's use of real tigers to shoot advertisements, we also have to admit that the effect of this advertisement is really real, smart and high-end, so the recent controversy that Gucci has received is actually far less than the revenue that this advertisement has brought to Gucci.

In order to make the advertisement more realistic, look more classy, and shoot better, in order to make the whole picture unique, in order to better attract people's attention.

Because the Year of the Tiger in China is coming, using a real tiger to look not only lifelike, but also makes the whole picture feel different, which will attract everyone's attention.

I think it may be for the authenticity of the advertisement, so I don't use fake tiger shooting.

Some people feel that this advertisement has caused a bad influence on the tiger, and it is not an act of protecting the tiger, and they feel that it is very inappropriate to let the tiger shoot the advertisement, and this kind of creative idea should not be launched.

Gucci's move has sparked controversy over animal protection, and Gucci's approach has angered animal protection organizations.

Because this can improve the realism of the advertisement, so that people can understand the brand more accurately, can expand the influence of their own brand, and increase people's sense of experience to a certain extent.

Will not write this, alas. This is done because the brand feels that it is memorable and can also show the sincerity of the brand.

Because in this way, you can expand the intensity of publicity, be more effective, more attractive, make yourself very topical, and increase your popularity.

I think this method is very dangerous, and it will cause your personal safety to suffer a certain amount of harm to your personal safety, and the tiger is now a protected animal, and it has violated the relevant laws, so it is not recommended to use real tigers to shoot advertisements.

I think this approach is very dangerous, because although I want to show more authenticity of the advertisement, but the Huai tiger, as a very fierce animal, although it has been nucleated by human taming, it is still more dangerous.

This kind of shooting will definitely bring a lot of unfavorable socks and wandering influences, there is no way to guarantee the shooting situation, and the use of real tigers will definitely bring unexpected situations, so it will cause controversy to Mochang.

This is suspected of violating the law, because real tigers are protected by law, and if real tigers are used for the purpose of shooting advertisements, it must be illegal.

Yes, it has been violated because animals are protected by the state, and it must have violated the corresponding regulations by being used in advertising.

It is suspected of violating the law, because this tiger is a protected animal of the state, and if it is used indiscriminately, it will violate the right to privacy and portrait rights.

Because foreigners will feel that this phenomenon will trigger people's hunting of endangered animals, which is a social phenomenon that is not good for preparation, and Chinese netizens believe that the Chinese Year of the Tiger is coming, and this is an auspicious omen for coarse hermit.

Real tigers pose a safety hazard to models, and tigers are protected animals and should not be placed in advertisements to attract traffic.

The focus of debate among netizens is whether this tiger has been trained or not, and whether it will bite the enemy? Microsoft technology is very big.

The brand said that although real tigers were used in the advertisement, the tigers were filmed in a completely safe environment, but they would be taken as a warning later.

The tiger was filmed in a very safe environment and did not hurt the tiger, so there were no serious consequences.

The official response said that it was carried out in a safe environment, and I don't think you should risk safety at any time.