In terms of the performance of a weak sense of dedication, the lack of dedication is a performance

To quote another enthusiastic netizen: A college student said that soldiers should donate taxpayers' money.

Well, the person who said this, gives you four hundred yuan a month, eats a big pot of rice at a time, is in danger of sacrifice at any time, and there is no guarantee to come back to work, go? A soldier, with a background away from home, when everyone is dreaming in the bed, they are vigilant against the enemy's attack on the high mountains and islands and on the border of the motherland, in order to ensure the peace of the people and not be disturbed by the war? What did they complain about, Meng Xiangbin who went into the water to save people.

and Xu Honggang.

When they even give their lives to save people, is it an obligation? Obligation, this cold word will make countless soldiers sad, can it be said that soldiers are desperate to defend their homes and defend the country, and to rescue the people regardless of their own safety in times of disaster, is it an obligation? Then why don't the people who say this come and dedicate themselves and go to the disaster area to provide disaster relief, this society is too unfair to the soldiers.

We are not saints ourselves, and there is no need to ask others to be saints as well.

More than 90% of the people in the world should be just ordinary people, you are actually better off doing what you should do, and if you are pure and helpful by nature, you can do more good things.

If you are just an ordinary person, you don't have so much "I am for everyone, everyone is for me", do your own thing, do your own duty, in fact, it is also a soldier's patriotism and a manifestation of building a country.

in formalism.

In this regard, it is necessary to focus on solving the problem that the style of deployment work is not pragmatic. It mainly includes that the deployment work is copied and transferred, and is not combined with reality; Accustomed to using meetings to implement work, after the meeting decomposition responsibility is not enough, tracking and promotion is not effective; There are not many methods, there is not much determination, and the level of work has not been significantly improved for a long time; Insufficient coordination, poor linkage, and insufficient integration of forces; The weekly plan and monthly summary are not enough comments from the main leaders, the phased promotion of key work is not enough, and the supervision and implementation are not strong; Low sense of identity for strict management, unconsciously and infrequently implemented the system; Turning a blind eye to problems, the problem of being a good person, etc. One is in terms of formalism:

Focus on solving the problem of unrealistic work style in deployment.

It mainly includes that the deployment work is copied and transferred, and is not combined with reality;

Accustomed to using meetings to implement work, after the meeting decomposition responsibility is not enough, tracking and promotion is not effective;

There are not many methods, there is not much determination, and the level of work has not been significantly improved for a long time;

Insufficient coordination, poor linkage, and insufficient integration of forces;

The weekly plan and monthly summary are not enough comments from the main leaders, the phased promotion of key work is not enough, and the supervision and implementation are not strong;

Low sense of identity for strict management, unconsciously and infrequently implemented the system;

The problem of turning a blind eye to the problem and being a good person.

Second, in terms of bureaucracy:

The leadership role of the key solution is not prominent.

It mainly includes: the concept of the masses, the consciousness of serving the people is weak, and the demands of the masses are not attentive, impatient, and unsatisfied.