Trump s Twitter banned permanently! 80 million followers emptied in a second

On January 8, 2021, Trump's Twitter was permanently banned, meaning he lost the most important social ** platform that he could communicate with more than 10,000 people. Previously, Trump's Twitter has been temporarily banned, and his access to other social media platforms has also been restricted. Twitter said he violated the platform's code of conduct, including a series of statements on Twitter that were seen as incitement during the demonstrations and led to the Capitol attack.

The ban gives Twitter a good opportunity to show that it is responsible for the actions of influential accounts and to promote their code of conduct and rules.

1. Because of network delay, try to restart the network pure rock boring. Twitter is an American social networking and microblogging service dedicated to serving the public conversation.

2. Twitter officials said that Trump may be permanently banned for violating Twitter rules. This means that within 12 hours, the tweet will be blocked and the suspected fake news will be removed. If the Tweet is not removed, it will remain closed.

3. Twitter cannot be unfrozen forever. Twitter is permanently suspended for reasons such as the Twitter system thinking that we may be bots, adding a large number of followers just after the account is registered, or posting a large number of advertising messages, reporting abusive tweets, or being attacked or caught in security risks.

5. Secondly, you need to check Twitter's usage policy to find out if you have violated Twitter's rules. If this is the case, you will need to admit your mistake in your grievance and show your good faith to cooperate with Twitter to ensure that you do not violate the rules again in the future.

Because at this stage, some of the actions of Trump supporters, and some inappropriate rhetoric and incitement, will have a negative impact on the entire American society. So Twitter banned 70,000 Trump supporters' accounts.

Because the comments of these accounts are not legal at all, they can only be banned as soon as possible.

He wants to be a platform that he can speak out of, and he doesn't want to be banned and controlled by other platforms, Lao Teh is still a child's character, and I hope he can continue and never play at will.

He just wanted to return to the social platform, blocked his Twitter, and he built his own platform.

Because most of Trump's actions are to dump the blame on China and not recognize the election results, even during his tenure, he often tweeted some very casual words, so Americans also feel ashamed to have such a **.

In fact, it is because he has been the top leader of this country and knows the important secrets of many countries, so he is very afraid of him talking.

This is because Trump always wants to destroy the interests of their country, and in addition to that, he wants to act against others, so he is afraid of Trump speaking.

How did American citizens get involved in politics in the earliest days? Find a place with a lot of people, such as a park or a vegetable market, put a (wooden) soapbox on the ground, stand on the soapbox and give a speech, and people will come together. In fact, the city hall is also a public space, but it is an official venue, and the authorities always have a way to restrict you, especially when the authorities are still colonial officials, if you want to discuss the issue of independence, you have to go to the vegetable market, to the park.

Most Americans today don't go to the park for recreation or the wet market for shopping. Instead, entertainment is an entertainment, shopping and dining complex invested by a private real estate company, similar to Beijing's Blue Harbor, or Houhai, or Wanda Plaza, the difference is that in the United States, even the land belt industry is a private company. Wet markets, street markets have also basically perished, and people go to Walmart, wholefoods, and even Amazon to buy things.

Say, can I break into your house and talk about local public affairs with a loudspeaker? No, it's trespassing. Then I obviously can't do this at Wal-Mart, I can't do it at Wanda Plaza and Houhai.

The security guard of the supermarket can throw me out, which is not a violation of free speech (before the black civil rights movement, private owners could even decide not to serve certain people, such as opening a restaurant and not entertaining black people, because the hotel is the private property of others, and through the civil rights movement, the right of commercial owners to refuse to enter their commercial real estate by certain people is denied, without this, you don't need to do anything, Wal-Mart can throw you out for no reason). But apart from these places, Americans don't go anywhere else, so the public space is gradually killed and turned into a private sphere.

It's interesting that "public space" means a place where people go, but what should people do if they don't go to the places owned and managed by the "public" and go to the territory of private companies?

Technology is developing, capitalism is developing, things are no longer the same as in the pastoral era of the eighteenth century, today more and more platforms and infrastructure are being privatized, go to Zhongguancun North Street for a walk, and even the aunt sweeping the street can tell you: do platform, don't do content. Companies that have succeeded in making platforms, such as Twitter, Amazon, Walmart (in a sense, it doesn't produce goods, it's a sales platform), they play the role of public service, they have public power, they look like "public", they sound like "public", but if you look at their "bill of right", you will find that they are actually only accountable to shareholders.

Today's incident is an accident and a personal act, but it also pierces this layer of window paper: some platforms that seem to be public are actually shareholders, enterprises, not users.

A long time ago, when my father and I were talking about some grassroots work in the Communist Youth League, he said a few words, "With a sharp weapon, the murderous intent arises." ”

This kind of thing is not a problem of a certain country, regardless of the East or the West, but no country has ever done so. The Twitter incident is special in two aspects, on the one hand, the private use of public weapons and murderous intent are two hailstorm things; On the other hand, information power is not yet public power, but it is no less powerful than public power, if China's barbaric growth is a railway guerrilla, then the United States is a barbarian nuclear submarine. Fortunately, China and the United States are not weak, like the Middle East and North Africa, which were directly bulldozed by the barbarians.

It's hard for you to think about the relationship between the Arabian Winter and this for the first time, right? Think about it, will this Twitter employee and his colleagues have adhered to the ethics of Gaddafi Assad for the past decade or so? As for his North African counterpart, he copied the guy directly.

Armed with a sharp weapon, he started to kill the stalls. The wrath of the horseman, the blood flowed like a river. These barbarians are destined to kill the chickens and dogs of the Middle East and North Africa, and I only hope that they will not let China follow the dead, and they will not kill the United States**, let alone the United States in China**.

They can't do it even with higher requirements.