Why compare Ross to Iverson?

Answer and Rose are two styles of guards who are very close, both are fast, and both have a strong desire to attack, and they are not far behind in bounce, the former has participated in the slam dunk contest, and the latter often plays aerial dunks in the game. The only difference is Iverson's rebellious attitude, while Rose is much more well-behaved, depending on personal preference.

Rose and iVersion are both known for their speed, with sharp breakthroughs, and I personally think that the current Rose is not as good as the peak AI

Xiao Ai is the shortest champion in history, and Rose is the second shortest champion. Rose won the regular season MVP in his third season and led the team to the regular season championship, and so far he can match or even surpass Xiao Ai in personal honors. But in terms of influence, Xiao Ai is a sign of the times.

No one can surpass it.

Iverson's advantage is that his ability to dribble under the crotch is very strong, and his flower arrangement ability is very good, his personality is very good, and his performance on the court is very good. Rose's advantage is that the body's reaction speed is very fast, the physical fitness is very good, the explosiveness is very strong, and the skill of the client column is very superb, the disadvantage is that the physical fitness is not particularly high, the body's tolerance is not particularly good, there are more injuries, and it will be easy to get injured.

Iverson averaged points, rebounds, assists and steals per game, shooting 42% from the field and 32% from three-point range.

The advantage is that they are fast and explosive. But what is certain is that they can only be point guards, not forwards. And the eyesight is not good enough.

Iverson and Rose are both superstars in the NBA, and both have great individual and leadership skills.

Iverson is now retired, and Rose is no longer the youngest MVP of the year, they were all stars in the NBA who caused headaches for defenders.

First of all, in terms of speed, we all know that Iverson is very fast, and Ross is not slow, but I personally feel that Iverson is relatively faster.

We often see Iverson's fast break on the court, and the speed of the layup after passing the pass, which is very fast, so I feel that Iverson has a slight edge in terms of speed.

Explosiveness, explosiveness My personal feeling is Rose, the two of them are not high in the guards, what I often see on the field is Rose's cruel and violent dunk, because I watched very little live broadcast of Rose at his peak, but I have seen his highlights, the cruel dunk, it makes people's blood boil.

So the leader in this one is Rose.

Flexibility, both of them are very good on the court, especially Rose, his layups are basically pulled, not pulls the rod is uncomfortable, it may be seen that he is very flexible.

Iverson, what is impressive is his passing, as the saying goes, crossing you is like crossing the road in the early morning, it is very easy to pass you, his change of direction is passing, even if you know where he is going, you have no way to take him, this is his strength, you can see it through the ball he shook off Jordan.

So I think Iverson is more flexible.

So, in general, both of them are very strong, but I think Iverson is a little stronger, Iverson has a tenacious, unconvinced attitude, watching his game, like if the other party wants to win, you have to step over his corpse, just like the first game of the finals against the OK combination, Rose, the youngest MVP, also used to kill all sides in the arena, and then due to injury, he became less brave.

It may be that Iverson is stronger at the peak, first of all, the two of them can't be regarded as an era, and Iverson is no longer young when Rose stepped into the NBA.

How many people still remember the shot of Iverson hitting the shot in a row under Jordan's defense, Iverson was unruly. As the champion of the 96** generation, as soon as he entered the league, he was full of glory, and his change of direction was so large that the defenders were often unable to resist.

Remember the image of Iverson stepping over Tyronn Lue after facing the Lakers' shot from the bottom corner? He has become an eternal classic in the minds of a generation, and a small man has dominated the NBA, and his ability can be seen.

Rose is also a top pick, relying on super physical fitness to quickly gain a foothold in the NBA. Others change direction to slow down, he doesn't slow down or change direction, passing people is like crossing the road, breaking into the inside line to face the defense is either a violent buckle or a super lever, his game is very enjoyable.

It was this devastating style of play that overwhelmed Rose's body, and the successive injuries almost destroyed his mental qualities, but he was strong enough to get back on his feet and get back on the field.

It doesn't matter if you dunk, pull up or make a layup, it's 2 points, and the biggest difference between Rose and Iverson is in the shooting percentage. We all know that Rose doesn't have a basket, others can put him a meter outside the three-point line to prevent him from breaking through, which is more passive, if you shoot, the hit rate is not good, if it is sudden, the opponent blocks your breakthrough route in advance.

Have you ever seen someone who defended Iverson and let him vote? No, that's the biggest gap between the two, so I think Iverson, who has a far better shooting ability than Rose, is better when both of them have strong breakthrough ability.

Both of them are very fond of it.,I'm a die-hard AI.,After careful consideration, I think it's still AI stronger.,Because Rose's peak is really too short.,Maybe it's not fair to consider.,But Rose's debut in 08 was really amazing in the league.,Personal feelings,Personal influence,Detail technology and speed,AI dominance,Explosiveness and body,Ross is definitely stronger than AI。

No one has ever seen the peak of Ross, but at least it shows that the gap with AI is still not small. After all, the pinnacle of AI is something that Kobe Bryant can't reach. It's just that a good center is missing, otherwise there is no talk of the Zijin Dynasty.

Can't compare to Ross not having his prime. I haven't played normally since the age of 23, and I've spent my peak years with injuries.

Rose, I don't think I'm at the top, and I can't see it when I'm injured. Iverson's peak should be 01, scoring champion, steal champion, MVP, All-Star MVP, Eastern Conference champion. In the end, he lost to the Lakers.

And Rose is the youngest MVP, and the description of Rose's body before the '08 draft is the strength of a bear, the speed of a leopard. If Rose can get to the top without injury, I think it's going to be better than Iverson, it's a lot stronger physically. But judging from the current results, I don't think any star has performed better in a season than Iverson in '01 after '01.

I think the only one who has the courage to match Jordan is Iverson.

Rose is not at his peak at all, and Rose, who won the MVP, is just a rising star who is far from reaching his own peak, and has already been tormented by injuries, so the peak of Al should be strong.

Iverson scored more points and led the team stronger.

Iverson's pinnacle? It's too short, and within a few years of fighting, the league changed the breaking rules. Otherwise, I feel that Iverson may go further, of course, the championship should still be out of the question, but the data will definitely go up a lot.

It would be great if a healthy Rose had the current three-point skill pack, not to mention what kind of skill pack Rose could have at the peak.

No one has ever seen Ross at the top.

Who dares to say that a champion Xiu Sui is already at his peak and will not improve again.

No one knows what heights a healthy Rose will take that bull at the age of age.

There is no peak Rose, only a healthy Rose.

Rose was knocked out by injuries before he was even in his prime.