What are the requirements for a good article?

First of all, you have to think about the material and what you want to write about.

It should be central, if it is a narrative, it is necessary to grasp the details of one thing to describe (for those who write about one thing), and if there are many things, it must be detailed.

The beginning is either "straight to the point", or it is a foreshadowing or something related to paving the way for the following.

The ending can echo the beginning, or it can point out the center of the article, or give the reader a space for imagination (preferably in connection with what you are writing).

Writing a scene is simple, you can start with "What is the weather today" or quote someone wrote a poem, etc., you should grasp a scene in the middle and describe it in detail, and end with something you learned from something.

Or maybe it's a feeling about the quality of the scene or something.

The discussion should express its own views, and the positive and negative views should be clear.

To write a good article, it is best to write a diary or weekly diary, which can accumulate material.

According to Xuexuetang, although writing ** is a painful process, there are still many things to pay attention to:

1、"Me"Use less colloquial words"Author"The first reaction of the teacher is like copying, and the standard usage is the person.

2. Exclamation marks and question marks should be used sparingly, ** academic articles are rigorous, exclamation marks are too close to the Internet language is not in line with the norms, question marks can only be used at the end, and other places can be used less as much as possible, because ** is not an emotional article.

3. Try not to use sentences and quotations, because ** is rigorous, even if it is a humanities and social sciences class, you must pay attention to the logic of the language.

4. Pay attention to the citation specification, because it is rigorous, even if it is a humanities and social sciences, it is necessary to pay attention to the logic of the language.

5. Direct citation can not exceed 15%-25% of the full text (now key universities have generally changed to 5% because of the Zhai Tianlin incident, but foreign universities are not so strict), indirect citation can not exceed 30%, most of the citations are concentrated in the opening topic, research review, theoretical research, ** the middle and back parts should not be marked in red as much as possible, some professors will be particularly concerned and more serious.

6. Footnotes, footnotes or footnotes, important things are said three times, and the teacher usually hits back without footnotes, first change the format, how to mark the footnotes with reference to the format template of each school.

7. The main structure should meet the specifications.

8. To be polite and modest in the negation of your predecessors, you can cite all academic experts, of course, you can not listen to it, the result is to cause the teacher to feel annoyed, and change it for no reason, once, twice, three times, n times.

9. The references need to correspond to the sentences in ** one by one, the annotation is standardized, many students' references are copied randomly, and they cannot correspond to the text at all, why should the teacher read it so seriously, it is a respect for your hard work, so the question is, as a student, should you also respect the teacher's feelings? Don't insult the teacher's IQ.

10. The thank you speech should be written carefully, don't copy it randomly, 70% of the thank you words are formulaic, in fact, there is nothing to blame, but 30% of the copy is not even in line with the actual situation, a little bit of dim sum, it can definitely save you a lot of time for revision. Because many teachers in the office have talked about this problem, most of the opinions are that when encountered, it will become a change for no reason. Or just find a reason to modify it, and call it beautifully:

Sharpening a student's academic temperament will be good for his future life path.

**Writing Skills:1. Before writing.

1. Know to state the argument in the introduction.

2. Use the remaining part of ** to state the reasons and evidence so that the argument is fully supported.

3. Consider the order in which you want to present them: how to structure the paragraphs is the clearest and most convincing.

Second, the first structural arrangement skills.

1. Similar ideas should usually be clustered together, not scattered.

2. Each paragraph should have a difference in font, such as indenting or leaving extra line spacing between paragraphs.

3. Only one point should be stated in each paragraph.

4. Each paragraph can be regarded as a short essay.

Start with a topic sentence that introduces the main points of the paragraph;

Explain this point further;

Provide appropriate evidence for opinions;

interpreting or analysing evidence;

Summarize the main points and point out how they relate to the overall argument.

5. Each paragraph should be connected to the next paragraph using transition words or phrases.

6. The order of paragraphs should be logical and consistent.

7. Once you have written the first draft, try to summarize the main points of each paragraph in one sentence.

Whether an essay is good or bad is actually very subjective, some people think that the content structure is the most important, and some people think that the writing rhetoric is the most important. And it also depends on what type of article, for example, ** will attract readers with the creativity and entertainment of the book, newspaper reports will be flaunted to hit the nail on the head, and poetry will be judged by writing rhetoric, so different types of Zibi articles should also be commented on with different standards. For example, I remember that the author of "Harry Potter" once said that the first episode she wrote was written for 11-year-old children, the second episode was for 12-year-old readers, the third episode was for 13-year-olds, and so on, so you will find that the first episode is the most obvious, the second episode is a little deeper, and the third episode is a little deeper.

Therefore, I think that a good article must be written according to the reader's education level, preferences, etc. Finally, I think a good article must have positive content. I remember once reading a very good writing rhetoric on the Internet**, but it's a pity that this ** can only get the runner-up in the essay competition, because its content is very negative, and the whole ** is also about how the male protagonist passively sends away his lover, because his family is poor, so he can't give his lover a good life.

If the author writes that the male protagonist is actively trying to make money to get out of poverty, I believe that this work has a chance to win the championship. Therefore, the positive nature of the content is very important, such as articles that teach people suicide, superstition, crime, no matter how well written they are, they are not good articles.

Reference: Own opinion.

Rhetoric, description, creativity, structure, content, opinion, la....

The text is neat, neatly organized, rhetorical appropriate, descriptive, and creative.