What would be the impact of a large island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean on the pattern of the

It's hard to say what the impact of the political pattern will be, let's talk about geography first, I don't know what the concept of the big island is, we have artificial regulations: the Australian continent is the smallest continent on the earth, and everything smaller than the Australian continent is called an island. Let's talk about the location, if the island is large enough, at the equator, it will affect the three ocean currents, especially the equatorial countercurrent is directly blocked, it will be divided into two branches, north and south, passing around the island, and then squeezing the north and south equatorial warm currents to the south and north, and then, the northeast trade wind belt and the southeast trade wind belt will move to two levels, the subtropical high pressure belt.

It will also move towards the poles. In short, the global climate is affected. If a little northerly appears near Hawaii, the figure-eight current in the Northern Hemisphere will become.

Sugar gourd type, three circles. The middle circle is around the island. If it's a little southerly, it might be a little better.

It is possible that it will not affect the figure-0 circulation in the Southern Hemisphere, or it may be like the Australian Eye, separating the Pacific Ocean into two oceans, forming a current similar to the East Australian Warm Current and the Western Australian Cold Current, and turning the Southern Hemisphere Pacific Current into 00. Because the Pacific Ocean is large, there is a large area in the middle, not a single point. But in any case, with such a large area of land, the sea level will rise by tens of meters.

By then, many places will already be below sea level.

I looked at the topographic map, and if the sea level drops to a certain level, large islands that are submerged in the sea will appear on the surface of the sea, so this is possible.

The pattern will still have an impact, because the appearance of a large island will definitely make the Pacific Ocean have a certain amount of badness.

If there is such a big island, then this island must be a follower of the United States.

It has a great impact, if there is a big island, then many countries in the world will fight for this island, then it will cause war.

In fact, it will have a very big impact on the world, and if there is one more island, many countries should compete for this island.

If there is a big island, I think the impact on the world will be very large, and there will be many countries vying for the ownership of this island.

There is no impact, looking at Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and other islands, I don't see any impact.

It will seriously affect the pattern of the world, cause instability in the world, form a new world pattern, and form new world contradictions.

Of course, there will be some changes to the world pattern, and this is a very magical change.

Is there a big island in the Pacific Ocean? First the sea level rose a lot, a lot, and then, Japan was gone, permanently submerged under water.

If the moon were as suitable for human life as the earth, what would happen to the world?

In the middle of the Pacific Ocean, there is a large island, and there will definitely be many people exploring that place.

I think it will have a certain impact on the pattern of the world, but it will not have a big impact either.

Summary. Because "the Pacific Ocean is in the east of China", that is, you say "China is on the west coast of the Pacific Ocean", these two sentences express the same meaning.

Why is China in the east of the world, but on the west coast of the Pacific Ocean? One of these two clauses is based on the Pacific Ocean as a reference, and the other is due to geographical factors, or rather relative to Western countries, both are correct, but the reference is different. <>

Why is it that China borders the Pacific Ocean in the east, but most of it does not have a single part of the Pacific Ocean?

Your question, why is China bordered by the Pacific Ocean in the east, but most of it does not have a piece of the Pacific Ocean? The answer is being compiled for you.

Because "Pacific Rubber Pants Mountain in the east of China", that is, what you call "Liangzhong China is on the west coast of the Pacific Ocean", these two sentences express the same meaning. Why is China in the east of the world, but on the west coast of the Pacific Ocean? One of these two clauses is based on the Pacific Ocean as a reference, and the other is due to geographical factors, or rather a pure ruler relative to the West, both are correct, but the reference is different.

Hello subject, the explanation is as follows: (with a few illustrations attached).

The western part of the Pacific Ocean is bordered by several tectonic plates. The Pacific Plate is adjacent to the Eurasian Plate, the Indian Ocean Plate, and the Antarctic Plate from north to south in the west. Among them, the Eurasian plate is a continental plate, and the Pacific plate is an oceanic plate, and island arcs and trenches will be formed at the junction of the oceanic plate and the land plate.

In particular, Southeast Asia (also belonging to the western Pacific Ocean) is the junction of the hardness ocean plate, the Eurasian plate and the Pacific plate, and there are many volcanoes (Indonesia is the country with the most volcanoes in the world). Japan's ** is also due to plate movements), therefore, the western Pacific region, the coastline is tortuous, with many peninsulas and islands.

<> hope mine is helpful to you.

Due to its high density, the Pacific plate subducted below the Eurasian plate at a low position, forming a sea trench, and the Eurasian plate was squeezed into an arch and uplifted into an island arc.