I m interested in history 5, I m interested in history

I am relatively ancient, but from what I know and some information, I currently believe that the historical authenticity of the West is much more reliable than that of China. China has gone through thousands of years, it is said"5000"years, but the puzzling thing is that a lot of time and epics in Chinese history are quite lacking in evidence, and in terms of scholarship, many of the places mentioned in the Western Bible have been dug up, and what about China? A lot of things are ambiguous.

In terms of social sciences, some dynasties in history would make drastic revisions to historical books, such as the total number of books that were unfavorable to the Manchu Qing Dynasty when Qianlong of the Qing Dynasty compiled the Siku Quanshu, which was estimated to be 13,600 volumes. "Four libraries were completed and ten thousand books were destroyed"That's the truth. The total number of books burned, 150,000 copies.

More than 170 kinds and more than 80,000 pieces of plates were destroyed. In addition to burning books, the Manchus also systematically destroyed Ming Dynasty archives. At present, there are only more than 3,000 archives of the Ming Dynasty, mainly the archives of the military department of the Tianqi and Chongzhen dynasties, and a small number of official documents of the Hongwu, Yongle, Xuande, Chenghua, Zhengde, Jiajing, Longqing, Wanli, and Taichang dynasties (many of which have been modified by the Manchu Dynasty).

The rest, estimated at no less than 10 million Ming Dynasty archives, have all been destroyed. In addition to destroying books and archives, the Manchus also systematically tampered with the remaining books and archives. Therefore, there is not much credibility of the current Chinese history, whether in textbooks or related books.

And even if it is the scriptures left in ancient times, people today are not aware of it, nonsense, because people's thinking has changed for thousands of years, so for ancient things, in fact, the understanding of the deviation is very large, and the thinking is just reckless, for a simple example. For example, if there is a cloud in the Analects, and if you are a threesome, you must have my teacher. The textbook explains that the three of them go together, and there must be a gentleman worth learning from me.

In fact, it is purely misleading.

The Five Elements are benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, and holiness: benevolence is in the form of virtue in the inner word, not in the line of the inner word. The righteous form is in the inner form of virtue, not in the inner word.

Etiquette is in the form of virtue in the inner word, not in the line of the inner word. The wisdom form is in the inner form of virtue, not in the inner word. The act of virtue in the form of the inner word is not the act of virtue in the inner word.

The five lines of virtue are virtue, and the four elements are good. Good, humane too. Virtue, the way of heaven also.

Five elements: benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, and holiness.

Four elements: benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, and wisdom.

Three elements: righteousness, propriety, and wisdom.

People: It's not human, but it's just a fake for benevolence.

Threesome: Four rows. The four elements are said to be good, good, and humane.

Analects: Threesome, there must be my teacher. 」

Official fallacy: Three people go together, there must be a gentleman worth learning from me.

Restoration: The Analects of the Analects: Four lines, there must be my teacher. Translation: Practicing benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom, there must be something worthy of emulation among the four elements.

The Sangu Thatched House is very historic.

At the end of the Han Dynasty, Cao Cao sat in the imperial court, and Sun Quan supported the Eastern Wu and Han Dynasty.

Mu Liu Bei listened. And.

said that Zhuge Liang was very knowledgeable and talented, so he took Guan Yu and Zhang Fei.

With a gift arrived. Now the west of Nanyang City, Henan, one is said to be Hubei.

Southwest) to ask Zhuge Liang to come out of the mountain to assist him. It happened that Zhuge Liang went out that day, and Liu Bei had to go back disappointed. Soon, Liu Bei, Guan Yu and Zhang Fei braved the heavy snow to invite for the second time.

Unexpectedly, Zhuge Liang went out to wander again. Zhang Fei didn't want to come again, but when he saw that Zhuge Liang was not at home, he urged him to go back. Liu Bei had to leave a letter to express his admiration for Zhuge Liang and ask him to come out to help him save the country's dangerous situation.

After some time, Liu Bei ate vegetarian food for three days and was ready to invite Zhuge Liang again. Guan Yu said that Zhuge Liang may have a false name, and he may not have real talent and learning, so he doesn't need to go. Zhang Fei advocated that he should call alone, and if he didn't come, he would be tied up with a rope.

Liu Bei rebuked Zhang Fei and visited Zhuge Liang for the third time with them. At that time, Zhuge Liang was sleeping. Liu Bei didn't dare to alarm him, and stood until Zhuge Liang woke up, and then sat down and talked with each other.

If you look at the interview with Ding Zhaozhong, he said that he didn't think he was smart enough, so he gave up studying history.

History as we know it is nothing but a monument erected by the victors for themselves, and real history only exists at the moment when history happens.

History is actually only a part of ancient history, and the history we know is only full of doubts, who can know whether those ancient texts and ancient books are true.

Reading history makes people clear what people have to do in this short life Look at what our ancestors did.

This question bai

Many people have it, and they are interested in history. First of all, history, past events, there are many daos

It is worth learning from the internal study, "taking history as a mirror, allowing you to know the rise and fall", historical figures, historical events. Whatever happened at any time or in the next second turned into history. People, especially older people, like history even more, and people's moods are more flat, and they look at problems from different angles.

Secondly, I think that people who like history are still people who are curious about all things, and simplicity is like having fun in life, looking for a sense of identity and accomplishment in other people's worlds.

I am very interested in someone who does not understand history (freshness).

I don't know, but I'm also very interested in history.

A piece of history that interests me – the Jin Dynasty.

The two Jin Dynasty and the Sixteen Kingdoms were the most chaotic era in Chinese history. From the founding of the Western Jin Dynasty in 265 A.D. to the fall of the Northern Liang in 439 A.D., the period of 174 years included the Western Jin Dynasty, the Sixteen Kingdoms of the Eastern Jin Dynasty, the early years of the Northern Wei Dynasty, and the Southern Song Dynasty.

Although the Jin Dynasty ended the nearly 100-year secession of the Three Kingdoms and the Chinese nation was reunified, all the Jin Dynasty had was a unified shell. In this shell, the Jin Dynasty has never ended secession and strife. Regardless of the Western Jin Dynasty or the Eastern Jin Dynasty, except for a short period of ten years of peace after Emperor Wu of the Jin Dynasty Sima Yan destroyed Wu, there was no period of peace in the four seas later.

From then on, all that remained of the Jin Dynasty was war, iron blood, soldiers, power, lust, and hatred.

The history of the Jin Dynasty is actually a history of war, a history of fighting for the Central Plains, building hegemony, a history of fighting back and forth, a history of everyone wanting to win the world, a history of heroes, heroes, and traitors.

Have you seen those things in the Ming Dynasty?

- There is an answer there.

You can also say that you like that era.

Here are some ideas for you to improve your historical grades:

History learning is memorization and case analysis, but in fact, analysis questions are also based on memorization. So it's all about memory. Therefore, to improve historical grades, it is necessary to memorize the main content of textbooks, and if you want to memorize historical knowledge, there are rules to follow.

For example, the study of ancient history can be broken down into five major areas: political characteristics, economic characteristics, ethnic relations, foreign exchanges, and culture. For world history and modern Chinese history, it is necessary to pay attention to understanding, because many historical events are intertwined and inherited from each other, so as to form a relatively large memory network, which requires the help of understanding, linking the historical background at that time, and using the method of logical reasoning, it is easier to sort out the ins and outs of this historical event.

It is inevitable that you will make mistakes in the learning process, whether you are careless or just not, you must habitually collect these wrong questions, and each subject has an independent set of mistakes, when we review before the exam, they are the key review objects, so since you miss once, you may not be wrong a second time, only in this way you will not lose points again on the same question.

I like to watch documentaries and I'm interested in secrets and stuff.

It doesn't matter if you're not interested in studying history, you should be a student, I think history is much simpler than politics, politics can't be memorized, it's over, history is much simpler. You can find a lot of information from the topic stem, starting from the three major directions of economy, ideology, and politics, as well as other military and personal factors, and geographical environment. It looks like it's empty, but the teacher should be able to tidy it up during class.

I'm not in favor of rote memorization, which makes me forget quickly.

For example, Jiangsu's history textbook is divided into three books: political history, economic history, and intellectual history. To be honest, that's called a mess, an event he talks about in three books, you say it's annoying.

In the end, there were five books (and two elective books) for the college entrance examination, and I have seen people memorize each book five or six times. I've never been like that, I put all the books together, and when I see an event, I put the contents of the three books together, so that the memorization is more comprehensive.

In fact, notes are important, because the teacher will organize them more organized, but the book is more important, and there may not be detailed notes in the book.

I like history very much, but I sometimes get annoyed because it's an exam. So I memorized as if I was teaching others, and I was looking at my own memory loopholes, so I was talking to myself while memorizing. When someone asks you a question, you answer it carefully, and many times you may not understand what others don't understand, so you can promote it together.

I suggest you do a history class to represent something, when there is pressure, there is motivation. I used to be the representative of the history class, and sometimes if I didn't do well in the exam, the teacher would say: I haven't worked hard lately, I used to be the first in the exam, why can't I do it now, I have to take the lead.

I felt embarrassed when I was told by the teacher, but it was still a spur when I thought about it.

We must study with a heart that wants to learn history well.

Develop some interest.

I'm also a person who can't learn well if I'm not interested.

Interest is too abstract, no matter what others say, you can't be interested in it.

Read more historical stories, learn about history, or watch more history columns and costume dramas.

If you look at a little historical story, you will learn about someone or something and remember it. I won't give you an example, you can try it yourself.

Read more books about history--- TV and movies--- and --- to deepen your impression

History, I don't like history either. Don't force yourself.

Hehe, are you talking about junior high school, high school, or college? There are different approaches to different stages.