Is the colorblindness paradox unsolvable? How to solve the paradox of color blindness

The colorblindness paradox is actually an ancient philosophical question, a question of name and reality. The reality of a name may be different for everyone, because everyone's brain seems to be a little different. The human brain can be compared to a transformer, and the parameters of this converter are a little different for everyone, resulting in slightly different results.

The perception of color by human visual nerves is not exactly the same.

In fact, it is not to be answered, the so-called benevolent see the benevolent, the wise see the wise, and the views of two people on the same thing cannot be completely consistent.

Congenital color vision disorder, often referred to as color blindness, is the inability to distinguish between colors or a certain color in the natural spectrum; The poor ability to distinguish colors is called color weakness, color weakness, although they can see the colors seen by normal people, but the ability to recognize colors is slow or very poor, when the light is dark, some are almost the same as color blindness, or color vision fatigue, it is generally not easy to strictly distinguish from color blindness.

Color blindness and color deficiency are more common due to congenital factors. There are far more male patients than female patients.

**。Red-green color blindness is thought to be determined by two pairs of genes on the X chromosome, the red color blind gene and the green color change gene. Because these two pairs of genes are tightly linked on the X chromosome, they are often represented by a genetic symbol.

Red-green color blindness is inherited in an X-linked recessive manner. Males have only one X chromosome, so only one color blindness gene is needed to exhibit color blindness.

Females have two X chromosomes, so a pair of disease-causing alleles are needed to behave abnormally. If a normal woman is married to a colorblind male, the father's colorblind gene can be passed on to their daughter on the X chromosome, but not to their son. The daughter then passes on the color blindness gene from her father to her son, a phenomenon called cross-inheritance.

The above content reference: Encyclopedia - Color Blindness.

The colorblindness paradox is a logical puzzle, but it is not unsolvable.

First, the colorblindness paradox asks questions about the assumption that all people with color blindness are unable to distinguish between two colors, let's say red and green. This assumption itself is not necessarily true, as there are many different types and degrees of color blindness, and they may have different abilities to distinguish between different colors.

Second, even if we assume that this assumption is true, there are ways to solve this paradox. For example, we can use some special tests to determine if a person is color blind and find out the colors that he cannot distinguish. Then we can tell him this fact and ask him to take special measures when he needs to distinguish between the two colors, such as using some special tools or asking other people.

So, while the colorblindness paradox is a logical puzzle, it is not unsolvable. There are some special ways we can solve this problem.

Suppose he can only see red and green, that is, whether he sees the sky or the socks are green except red, if he has a white sock in front of him and he says blue (blue = green in the title), then other people will tell him that it is a white sock, and he will know that it is different.

From this point of view, if he is just confused with the name, that is, he just disagrees with the name blue, then he should not be color blind, but only perceive differently from us. For example, if someone calls a pig a pig or something else, it's just because he doesn't know the same way we do, not that he can't distinguish between a dog and a pig.

It cannot distinguish between various colors or a certain color in the natural spectrum; The poor ability to distinguish colors is called color weakness, color weakness, although they can see the colors seen by normal people, but the ability to recognize colors is slow or very poor, when the light is dark, some are almost the same as color blindness, or color vision fatigue, it is generally not easy to strictly distinguish from color blindness.

If you are limited to reasoning, this problem is impossible to solve, because under the conditions you provide, there is no way to provide information about the color of the color blind through channels other than the eyes. Strictly speaking, this question cannot be said to be a paradox. It is impossible to have this kind of problem in reality, first, the interchange of colors will be confused, and second, the diffuse reflection or direct light of the color field of the eye is processed by different reactive nerves, so the color blindness that meets the conditions in the question will see the blue of the picture and the blue of the TV will be different.

But if it is limited to theory, this problem is not valid, with the theory of control principle, the eye's judgment of color is a one-way non-feedback system, that is, it is impossible to use any device to observe the image of the subject.

He should never know, because he sees blue as green, and if you set blue to a, and green to b, I'm talking about blue and green, and it's not these two words, and Xiao Ming will see a as b, and Xiao Ming will subconsciously think that blue is green, and he thinks A as green, and B as blue, and when people say it's a color, he says it's blue, and Xiao Ming sees color B in his eyes, but he thinks color B is blue, so he thinks that people are talking about color B, and when people ask him what color A is, he sees it as B in his eyes But he just thinks that color B is blue, so he's blue, and color A is really blue in the eyes of a normal person, so there's no way to know.

The first thing I want to say is that you are not colorblind, which is why you have such hypothetical theories. Of course, this does not affect the proof:

Let's first call this person Xiao Ming, in Xiao Ming's brain two colors a and b, we use the English g and b two to represent the real colors he sees, that is, green and blue. While other people's minds see two colors, A and B, which are blue and green. Then here's what follows:

The color is in the brains of Xiao Ming, in the brains of other people.

a g blue.

b b green.

Because they have the same name, the test method is to put two chairs in an empty room, put two blue and green towels in the room, let Xiao Ming and the others divide into two groups, and tell them to take the blue towel and take a picture before going in, and then put the towel back in its place. This will allow you to detect.

The cause of your paradox is not color blindness, but cognitive error.

Want answers? I only saw this problem recently, and it was solved in 3 words. Learn about the three primary colors.

His understanding is different from that of ordinary people.