Wang Han s endorsement overturned, why won t he be legally responsible?

It will definitely bear a part of the legal responsibility. After all, it is a product endorsed by oneself, and when there is a problem with the product, it must bear part of the responsibility.

That's because Wang Han stopped endorsing when he knew that there was a problem with the endorsed product, and he also actively cooperated with the ** investigation after the overturn.

Because the incident was caused by the product, not directly caused by his endorsement.

Wang Han, the endorsement overturner, has a certain responsibility, and this responsibility lies in the fact that he did not tell everyone the news when he ended the endorsement. After all, today's netizens only care about money, and their money is lost, as long as you can find any relevant person, even if you have used it, they will make you responsible. There is no responsibility in other aspects, even if Wang Han doesn't speak out, I don't think he did anything wrong.

Wang Han also has a certain responsibility, because after all, this product was endorsed by Wang Han, and it still has a great impact on buyers.

Of course, there is responsibility, and ordinary people and fans buy because they trust the stars and then believe in the products they endorse. Celebrity endorsement products must first understand the performance and authenticity of the product, the product quality is worthy of endorsement before endorsement, do not understand the product, it is difficult to ensure the quality of the product under the premise of endorsement, will only let their fans and ordinary people be deceived, hurt their hearts, and will also let their image in the minds of fans plummet.

I think it's not wrong, but celebrity endorsements have a certain leading role, although they don't have legal responsibility, they need moral responsibility, so Wang Han must apologize.

First of all, Wang Han was not the spokesperson of this company a long time ago, and if the spokesperson did not know the product vulnerabilities when he endorsed the product, then the spokesperson would not be responsible. However, Wang Han is a public figure after all, and his reputation is the foundation of his evergreen in the entertainment industry, so Wang Han should still actively solve this matter.

First of all, we need to make it clear that there are indeed many people who know and recognize a certain type of product through advertising. In particular, some celebrities are particularly popular and have many fans, so celebrity endorsements will have a certain number of fans to use the product. From this point of view, the spokesperson is indeed suspected of guiding fans to consume.

In addition, whether celebrities should be responsible for endorsing products mainly depends on whether the celebrities understand the disadvantages of the products and whether they know that they are making false publicity. If it is in an unknowing situation, then the star is unlikely to be legally responsible. Besides, Wang Han ended the endorsement contract for the product a few years ago, so he will not bear legal responsibility.

However, it should be noted that as a public figure, you must always pay attention to your image in the minds of the people. And after all, he has endorsed this product, and many fans have been guided to invest, so Wang Han should still fulfill his obligations.

Celebrity spokesperson, of course, first of all, must understand whether there is a problem with the product he endorses, if he goes to be a spokesperson for money, it will mislead consumers, and if the endorsed product has a problem, he must be responsible.

I think I should be responsible, although Wang Han terminated the contract with Ai Qian Jin in 2018, but many of the victims bought the financial product because they trusted Wang Han, so Wang Han should be responsible.

He should be responsible, because he, as the spokesperson, did not understand and test the authenticity of the product in advance.

I don't think you need to be responsible if you don't have an explicit agreement, but after all, you are a public figure, and you have a guiding role, so you should bear moral responsibility.